Users' Perceptions About Lower Extremity Orthotic Devices: A Systematic Review

被引:4
|
作者
Orlando, Julie M. [1 ]
Li, Bai [1 ]
Bodt, Barry [2 ]
Lobo, Michele A. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Delaware, Dept Phys Therapy & Biomech, Movement Sci Program, Newark, DE USA
[2] Univ Delaware, Coll Hlth Sci, Biostat Core Facil, Newark, DE USA
[3] 540 S Coll Ave, Newark, DE 19713 USA
来源
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION | 2023年 / 104卷 / 04期
关键词
Attitude; Braces; Equipment design; Lower extremity; Orthotic devices; Perception; Rehabilitation; User-centered design; ANKLE-FOOT ORTHOSES; DESIGN; WALKING; BALANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.apmr.2022.10.010
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective: To systematically review perceptions from adults, children, and caregivers in scientific and open sources to determine how well lower extremity orthotic devices (LEODs) meet users' functional, expressive, aesthetic, and accessibility (FEA2) needs.Data Sources: Scientific source searches were conducted in the National Library of Medicine (PubMed/MEDLINE) and Web of Science; open source searches were conducted in Google Search Engine in April 2020.Study Selection: Inclusion criteria were reporting of users' perceptions about a LEOD, experimental or observational study design, including qualitative studies, and full text in English. Studies were excluded if the device only provided compression or perception data could not be extracted. One hundred seventy three scientific sources of 3440 screened were included (total of 1108 perceptions); 36 open sources of 150 screened were included (total of 508 perceptions).Data Extraction: Users' perceptions were independently coded by 2 trained, reliable coders.Data Synthesis: Across both source types, there were more perceptions about functional needs, and perceptions were more likely to be positive related to functional than expressive, aesthetic, or accessibility needs. Perceptions about expression, aesthetics, and accessibility were more fre-quently reported and more negative in open vs scientific sources. Users' perceptions varied depending on users' diagnosis and device type.Conclusions: There is significant room for improvement in how LEODs meet users' FEA2 needs, even in the area of function, which is often the primary focus when designing rehabilitation devices. Satisfaction with LEODs may be improved by addressing users' unmet needs. Individuals often choose not to use prescribed LEODs even when LEODs improve their function. This systematic review identifies needs for LEODs that are most important to users and highlights how well existing LEODs address those needs. Attention to these needs in the design, prescription, and implementation of LEODs may increase device utilization. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2023;104:645-55 (c) 2022 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:645 / 655
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Orthotic devices for tennis elbow: a systematic review
    Struijs, PAA
    Smidt, N
    Arola, H
    van Dijk, CN
    Buchbinder, R
    Assendelft, WJJ
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2001, 51 (472) : 924 - 929
  • [2] Effectiveness and Users' Perceptions of Upper Extremity Exoskeletons and Robot-Assisted Devices in Children with Physical Disabilities: Systematic Review
    Li, Bai
    Cunha, Andrea B.
    Lobo, Michele A.
    PHYSICAL & OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY IN PEDIATRICS, 2024, 44 (03) : 336 - 379
  • [3] Barriers and facilitators to lower extremity orthotic compliance in the pediatric population: A scoping review of the literature
    Marcotte, David
    Ferri, Erica
    Xue, Xiaotong
    Katsolis, Anastasia
    Rajotte, Elise
    Cardiff, Katrina
    Preuss, Richard
    PROSTHETICS AND ORTHOTICS INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 47 (02) : 155 - 167
  • [4] Lower Extremity Assistive Devices (LEADs): A Contemporary Literature Review
    Hegeman, Erik M.
    Huh, Jeannie
    FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 45 (02) : 192 - 201
  • [5] Balance and stability issues in lower extremity exoskeletons: A systematic review
    Hamza, Mukhtar Fatihu
    Ghazilla, Raja Arif Raja
    Muhammad, Bashir Bala
    Yap, Hwa Jen
    BIOCYBERNETICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 40 (04) : 1666 - 1679
  • [6] The use of exoskeleton robotic training on lower extremity function in spinal cord injuries: A systematic review
    Moriarty, Brian
    Jacob, Thomas
    Sadlowski, Max
    Fowler, Michael
    Rowan, Colten
    Chavarria, Joseph
    Avramis, Ioannis
    Rizkalla, James
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2025, 65 : 1 - 7
  • [7] Lower extremity robotic exoskeleton devices for overground ambulation recovery in acquired brain injury-A review
    Karunakaran, Kiran K.
    Pamula, Sai D.
    Bach, Caitlyn P.
    Legelen, Eliana
    Saleh, Soha
    Nolan, Karen J.
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROROBOTICS, 2023, 17
  • [8] Systematic Review on Wearable Lower Extremity Robotic Exoskeletons for Assisted Locomotion
    Qiu, Shuang
    Pei, Zhongcai
    Wang, Chen
    Tang, Zhiyong
    JOURNAL OF BIONIC ENGINEERING, 2023, 20 (02): : 436 - 469
  • [9] Lymphaticovenous Anastomosis for Lower Extremity Lymphedema: A Systematic Review
    Forte, Antonio J.
    Khan, Nawal
    Huayllani, Maria T.
    Boczar, Daniel
    Saleem, Humza Y.
    Lu, Xiaona
    Manrique, Oscar J.
    Ciudad, Pedro
    McLaughlin, Sarah A.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2020, 53 (01) : 17 - 24
  • [10] Systematic Review: Effectiveness of Mirror Therapy for Lower Extremity Post-Stroke
    Hung, Goris Kin Nga
    Li, Cabbee Tsz Lui
    Yiu, Alexander Miles
    Fong, Kenneth N. K.
    HONG KONG JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 2015, 26 : 51 - 59