The Effects of Partisan Media in the Face of Global Pandemic: How News Shaped COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy

被引:19
作者
Motta, Matt [1 ]
Stecula, Dominik [2 ]
机构
[1] Boston Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Law Policy & Management, 715 Albany St, Boston, MA 02118 USA
[2] Colorado State Univ, Dept Polit Sci, Ft Collins, CO USA
关键词
Media effects; partisan media; COVID-19; health politics; public opinion; UNITED-STATES; CORONAVIRUS; POPULISM;
D O I
10.1080/10584609.2023.2187496
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Some might expect the promise of ending a global pandemic via vaccination to interrupt conventional partisan media effect processes. We test that possibility by bringing together sentiment-scored COVID vaccine stories (N > 17,000) from cable and mainstream news outlets, N > 180,000 Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) reports, and six original surveys (N = 6,499), in order to investigate (1) whether partisan news outlets covered COVID vaccination in different ways, and (2) if differences in coverage increased vaccine hesitancy. We find that Fox News' (FXNWS) coverage was significantly more negative than that of other cable and mainstream sources, and is associated with increased negative public vaccine sentiment. In the aggregate, adverse event reports tended to increase following periods of heightened negativity on FXNWS. At the micro-level, self-reported FXNWS exposure is associated with increased vaccine refusal. Collectively, the results provide new insights into the public health consequences of vaccine politicization.
引用
收藏
页码:505 / 526
页数:22
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   Polarization and public health: Partisan differences in social distancing during the coronavirus pandemic [J].
Allcott, Hunt ;
Boxell, Levi ;
Conway, Jacob ;
Gentzkow, Matthew ;
Thaler, Michael ;
Yang, David .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2020, 191
[2]  
Benkler Y., 2018, Network Propaganda: Manipulation, Disinformation, and Radicalization in American Politics, DOI DOI 10.1093/OSO/9780190923624.001.0001
[3]  
Bump Philip., 2022, The Washington Post
[4]   Correlates and disparities of intention to vaccinate against COVID-19 [J].
Callaghan, Timothy ;
Moghtaderi, Ali ;
Lueck, Jennifer A. ;
Hotez, Peter ;
Strych, Ulrich ;
Dor, Avi ;
Fowler, Erika Franklin ;
Motta, Matthew .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2021, 272
[5]   Through the Grapevine: Informational Consequences of Interpersonal Political Communication [J].
Carlson, Taylor N. .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2019, 113 (02) :325-339
[6]   Partisan pandemic: How partisanship and public health concerns affect individuals' social mobility during COVID-19 [J].
Clinton, J. ;
Cohen, J. ;
Lapinski, J. ;
Trussler, M. .
SCIENCE ADVANCES, 2021, 7 (02)
[7]   Validating the demographic, political, psychological, and experimental results obtained from a new source of online survey respondents [J].
Coppock, Alexander ;
McClellan, Oliver A. .
RESEARCH & POLITICS, 2019, 6 (01)
[8]   Elderly people and responses to COVID-19 in 27 Countries [J].
Daoust, J. -F. .
PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (07)
[9]   Populist media diets [J].
de Rooij, Eline A. ;
Stecula, Dominik A. ;
Pickup, Mark A. .
SOCIAL SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2022, 103 (04) :975-991
[10]   No Need to Watch: How the Effects of Partisan Media Can Spread via Interpersonal Discussions [J].
Druckman, James N. ;
Levendusky, Matthew S. ;
McLain, Audrey .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2018, 62 (01) :99-112