Group management model for construction workers' unsafe behavior based on cognitive process model

被引:7
作者
Deng, Shuwen [1 ]
Cai, Yili [2 ]
Xie, Longpan [3 ]
Pan, Yonggang [1 ]
机构
[1] Xinjiang Univ, Urumqi, Peoples R China
[2] Ningbo Univ, Ningbo, Peoples R China
[3] Guangdong Univ Technol, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
关键词
Cognitive process model; Personalized management; Unsafe behaviors; Latent class analysis; LATENT CLASS ANALYSIS; SAFETY CLIMATE; SYSTEM; PREDICTORS; ALGORITHM; HEIGHTS; FALLS; SCALE;
D O I
10.1108/ECAM-12-2021-1073
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Purpose Unsafe behavior is a major cause of safety accidents, while in most management measures for unsafe behavior, the construction workers are generally managed as a whole. Therefore, this study aims to propose group management of construction workers' unsafe behavior considering individual characteristics. Design/methodology/approach A cognitive process model with ten cognitive factors was constructed based on cognitive safety theory. The questionnaire was developed and validated based on the cognitive model, and the results showed that the questionnaire had good reliability and validity, and the cognitive model fitted well. Latent class analysis was used to classify the unsafe behaviors of construction workers. Findings Four categories of cognitive excellent type, cognitive failure type, no fear type and knowingly offending type were obtained. Workers of cognitive excellent type have good cognitive ability and a small tendency for unsafe behaviors. Workers of cognitive failure type have poor cognitive ability and the potential for cognitive failure in all four cognitive links. Workers of no fear type have weak cognitive ability, and cognitive failure may occur in discovering information and choosing coping links. Workers of knowingly offending type have certain cognitive abilities, but cognitive failure may occur in choosing coping link. Originality/value This study formulates targeted management measures according to the potential characteristics of these four types and provides scientific theoretical support for the personalized management of unsafe behavior.
引用
收藏
页码:2928 / 2946
页数:19
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]  
Askaripoor T., 2015, TOLOO E BEHDASHT, V14, P33
[2]   Automatic Modulation Classification Using Combination of Genetic Programming and KNN [J].
Aslam, Muhammad Waqar ;
Zhu, Zhechen ;
Nandi, Asoke Kumar .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS, 2012, 11 (08) :2742-2750
[3]   Using feedback and reinforcement to improve the performance and safety of a roofing crew [J].
Austin, J ;
Kessler, ML ;
Riccobono, JE ;
Bailey, JS .
JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR MANAGEMENT, 1996, 16 (02) :49-75
[4]   Wearable technology for personalized construction safety monitoring and trending: Review of applicable devices [J].
Awolusi, Ibukun ;
Marks, Eric ;
Hallowell, Matthew .
AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2018, 85 :96-106
[5]  
Bartholomew D, 2011, WILEY SER PROBAB ST, P1
[6]   Risk Perception and Risk-Taking Behavior of Construction Site Dumper Drivers [J].
Bohm, Jonathan ;
Harris, Don .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND ERGONOMICS, 2010, 16 (01) :55-67
[7]   Why operatives engage in unsafe work behavior: Investigating factors on construction sites [J].
Choudhry, Rafiq M. ;
Fang, Dongping .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2008, 46 (04) :566-584
[8]   Evaluation of Cache Attacks on Arm Processors and Secure Caches [J].
Deng, Shuwen ;
Matyunin, Nikolay ;
Xiong, Wenjie ;
Katzenbeisser, Stefan ;
Szefer, Jakub .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTERS, 2022, 71 (09) :2248-2262
[9]   A deep hybrid learning model to detect unsafe behavior: Integrating convolution neural networks and long short-term memory [J].
Ding, Lieyun ;
Fang, Weili ;
Luo, Hanbin ;
Love, Peter E. D. ;
Zhong, Botao ;
Ouyang, Xi .
AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2018, 86 :118-124
[10]   Cascading vulnerability analysis of unsafe behaviors of construction workers from the perspective of network modeling [J].
Duan, Pinsheng ;
Zhou, Jianliang .
ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECTURAL MANAGEMENT, 2023, 30 (03) :1037-1060