Policy Networks Across Political Systems

被引:15
作者
Metz, Florence [1 ]
Brandenberger, Laurence [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Twente, Dept Governance & Technol Sustainabil, Drienerlolaan 5, NL-7522 NB Enschede, Netherlands
[2] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Chair Syst Design, Weinbergstr 56-58, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
COMPARING NETWORKS; MODELS; COLLABORATION; INSTITUTIONS; INFORMATION; COALITIONS; EXCHANGE; POWER;
D O I
10.1111/ajps.12699
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Polities shape power structures and interaction patterns between actors in policymaking processes. Although the social fabric of interactions is key to successful policymaking, it remains unclear which relational structures are typically found across political systems. By adopting a network approach, we analyse differences in power structures and interaction patterns across four policy networks in German and Swiss consensual-federal, French majoritarian-unitary, and hybrid Dutch consensual-unitary democracies. Using survey data from 149 state and non-state actors, we fit exponential random graph models and calculate predicted probabilities to compare the four networks. Results show that the consensus democracies institutionalize neighbourhoods of networks where actors share power and collaborate with opponents. Our case of a majoritarian democracy illustrates power concentration with restricted access to competitors, limiting the need to interact and search for compromises with opponents. Findings allow future work to differentiate typical from atypical network structures, given the embeddedness into a political system.
引用
收藏
页码:569 / 586
页数:18
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]  
Levy MA, 2016, J OPEN SOURCE SOFTW, V1, P36, DOI [10.21105/joss.00036, DOI 10.21105/JOSS.00036, 10.21105/joss.00036]
[2]  
Adam Silke., 2007, Theories of the Policy Process, V2nd, P129, DOI [10.4324/9780367274689-5, DOI 10.4324/9780367274689-5]
[3]  
Angst Mario., 2021, GOVERNANCE EARLY VIE, P1
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys, V6th
[5]   The multiple ambiguities of ''counteractive lobbying'' [J].
Baumgartner, FR ;
Leech, BL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 1996, 40 (02) :521-542
[6]  
Benaglia T, 2009, J STAT SOFTW, V32, P1
[7]   Self-Organizing Policy Networks: Risk, Partner Selection, and Cooperation in Estuaries [J].
Berardo, Ramiro ;
Scholz, John T. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2010, 54 (03) :632-649
[8]   Organizing Babylon - On the different conceptions of policy networks [J].
Borzel, TA .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 1998, 76 (02) :253-273
[9]  
Bressers HansTh. A., 1998, Journal of Public Policy, V13, P213, DOI [DOI 10.1017/S0143814X98000117, 10.1017/S0143814X98000117]
[10]   National REDD plus policy networks: from cooperation to conflict [J].
Brockhaus, Maria ;
Di Gregorio, Monica .
ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2014, 19 (04)