Including socioeconomic status reduces readmission penalties to safety-net hospitals

被引:0
|
作者
Gonzalez, Andrew A. [1 ,2 ,3 ,9 ]
Motaganahalli, Anush [2 ]
Saunders, Jordan [2 ,4 ]
Dev, Sharmistha [2 ,5 ,6 ]
Dev, Shantanu [2 ,7 ]
Ghaferi, Amir A. [8 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ Sch Med, Dept Surg, Div Vasc Surg, Indianapolis, IN USA
[2] Indiana Univ Sch Med, Regenstrief Inst, William Tierney Ctr Hlth Serv Res, Indianapolis, IN USA
[3] Indiana Univ Sch Med, Surg Outcomes & Qual Improvement Ctr, Indianapolis, IN USA
[4] Univ South Calif, Dept Urol, Catherine & Joseph Aresty, Los Angeles, CA USA
[5] Indiana Univ Sch Med, Richard L Roudebush Vet Adm Med Ctr, Indianapolis, IN USA
[6] Indiana Univ Sch Med, Dept Emergency Med, Indianapolis, IN USA
[7] Ohio State Univ, Coll Engn, Columbus, OH USA
[8] Med Coll Wisconsin, Dept Surg, Milwaukee, WI USA
[9] Regenstrief Inst Hlth Care, Ctr Hlth Serv Res, 1101 West Tenth St, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
关键词
Readmissions; Health services research; Medicare; Health policy; Lower extremity revascularization; LOWER-EXTREMITY AMPUTATION; RISK-FACTORS; AMERICAN-COLLEGE; INSURANCE STATUS; VASCULAR CARE; SURGERY; BYPASS; MORTALITY; SURVIVAL; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jvs.2023.11.027
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Medicare's Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program (HRRP) financially penalizes "excessive" postoperative readmissions. Concerned with creating a double standard for institutions treating a high percentage of economically vulnerable patients, Medicare elected to exclude socioeconomic status (SES) from its risk-adjustment model. However, recent evidence suggests that safety-net hospitals (SNHs) caring for many low-SES patients are disproportionately penalized under the HRRP. We sought to simulate the impact of including SES-sensitive models on HRRP penalties for hospitals performing lower extremity revascularization (LER). Methods: This is a retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of national data on Medicare patients undergoing open or endovascular LER procedures between 2007 and 2009. We used hierarchical logistic regression to generate hospital risk-standardized 30-day readmission rates under Medicare's current model (adjusting for age, sex, comorbidities, and procedure type) compared with models that also adjust for SES. We estimated the likelihood of a penalty and penalty size for SNHs compared with non-SNHs under the current Medicare model and these SES-sensitive models. Results: Our study population comprised 1708 hospitals performing 284,724 LER operations with an overall unadjusted readmission rate of 14.4% (standard deviation: 5.3%). Compared with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services model, adjusting for SES would not change the proportion of SNHs penalized for excess readmissions (55.1% vs 53.4%, P 1/4 .101) but would reduce penalty amounts for 38% of SNHs compared with only 17% of non-SNHs, P < .001. Conclusions: For LER, changing national Medicare policy to including SES in readmission risk-adjustment models would reduce penalty amounts to SNHs, especially for those that are also teaching institutions. Making further strides toward reducing the national disparity between SNHs and non-SHNs on readmissions, performance measures require strategies beyond simply altering the risk-adjustment model to include SES.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An exploration of community partnerships, safety-net hospitals, and readmission rates
    Cheon, Ohbet
    Baek, Juha
    Kash, Bita A.
    Jones, Stephen L.
    HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2020, 55 (04) : 531 - 540
  • [2] Management of glioblastoma at safety-net hospitals
    Brandel, Michael G.
    Rennert, Robert C.
    Ramos, Christian Lopez
    Santiago-Dieppa, David R.
    Steinberg, Jeffrey A.
    Sarkar, Reith R.
    Wali, Arvin R.
    Pannell, J. Scott
    Murphy, James D.
    Khalessi, Alexander A.
    JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2018, 139 (02) : 389 - 397
  • [3] The Financial Impact of an Avoided Readmission for Teaching and Safety-Net Hospitals Under Medicare's Hospital Readmission Reduction Program
    Hoffman, Geoffrey J.
    Tilson, Sibyl
    Yakusheva, Olga
    MEDICAL CARE RESEARCH AND REVIEW, 2020, 77 (04) : 324 - 333
  • [4] Challenges in Surgical Quality at Safety-Net Hospitals
    Macht, Ryan
    McAneny, David
    Doherty, Gerard
    JAMA SURGERY, 2016, 151 (09) : 795 - 796
  • [5] Utilization and Outcomes of Inpatient Surgery at Safety-Net Hospitals
    Herrel, Lindsey A.
    Wong, Sandra L.
    Ye, Zaojun
    Miller, David C.
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE FOR THE POOR AND UNDERSERVED, 2016, 27 (04) : 1872 - 1884
  • [6] Addressing the High Costs of Pancreaticoduodenectomy at Safety-Net Hospitals
    Go, Derek E.
    Abbott, Daniel E.
    Wima, Koffi
    Hanseman, Dennis J.
    Ertel, Audrey E.
    Chang, Alex L.
    Shah, Shimul A.
    Hoehn, Richard S.
    JAMA SURGERY, 2016, 151 (10) : 908 - 914
  • [7] Outcomes and Costs of Managing Appendicitis at Safety-Net Hospitals
    Won, Roy P.
    Friedlander, Scott
    Lee, Steven L.
    JAMA SURGERY, 2017, 152 (11) : 1001 - 1006
  • [8] Outcomes, Cost, and Readmission After Surgical Aortic or Mitral Valve Replacement at Safety-Net and Non-Safety-Net Hospitals
    Frankel, William C.
    Sylvester, Christopher B.
    Asokan, Sainath
    Ryan, Christopher T.
    Zea-Vera, Rodrigo
    Zhang, Qianzi
    Wall, Mathew J., Jr.
    Preventza, Ourania
    Coselli, Joseph S.
    Rosengart, Todd K.
    Chatterjee, Subhasis
    Ghanta, Ravi K.
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2022, 114 (03): : 703 - +
  • [9] Financial Stability of Level I Trauma Centers Within Safety-Net Hospitals
    Knowlton, Lisa M.
    Morris, Arden M.
    Tennakoon, Lakshika
    Spain, David A.
    Staudenmayer, Kristan L.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2018, 227 (02) : 172 - 180
  • [10] Failure to Rescue in Safety-Net Hospitals Availability of Hospital Resources and Differences in Performance
    Wakeam, Elliot
    Hevelone, Nathanael D.
    Maine, Rebecca
    Swain, Jabaris
    Lipsitz, Stuart A.
    Finlayson, Samuel R. G.
    Ashley, Stanley W.
    Weissman, Joel S.
    JAMA SURGERY, 2014, 149 (03) : 229 - 235