Comparison of progesterone protocol versus gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol in terms of preventing premature LH surge and assisted reproductive technology outcome in infertile women: a randomized controlled trial

被引:0
|
作者
Jabarpour, Masoome [1 ]
Pouri, Sara [2 ]
Aleyasin, Ashraf [2 ,3 ]
Shabani Nashtaei, Maryam [1 ,3 ]
Najafian, Aida [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Sch Med, Dept Anat, Tehran, Iran
[2] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Shariati Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Tehran 1411713135, Iran
[3] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Shariati Hosp, Dept Infertil, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Progesterone; GnRH antagonists; ART; LH surge; OVARIAN STIMULATION; EMBRYO-TRANSFER; SPERM INJECTION; LONG PROTOCOL; AGONIST; PHASE; GNRH; HYPERSTIMULATION; INHIBITION; MECHANISMS;
D O I
10.1007/s00404-024-07387-4
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Introduction Progesterone can be used instead of GnRH agonists and antagonists in order to avert a premature LH surge during controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) protocol. Nonetheless, there is limited knowledge regarding its utilization. Thus, this study compared the effects of progesterone and GnRH antagonists (GnRH-ant) on premature LH surges and assisted reproductive technology (ART) results in infertile women undergoing ART. Materials and methods In this clinical trial, the progesterone protocol (study group) and GnRH-ant protocol (control group) were tested in 300 infertile individuals undergoing IVF/ICSI. The main outcome was the number of oocytes retrieved. The secondary outcomes included premature LH rise/surge, the quantity of follicles measuring >= 10 and 14 mm, oocyte maturity and fertilization rate, the number of viable embryos, high-quality embryo rate and pregnancy outcomes. Results The study group exhibited a statistically significant increase in the number of retrieved oocytes, follicles measuring 14 mm or greater, and viable embryos compared to the control group (P < 0.05). The study group also increased oocyte maturity, chemical pregnancy rate, and clinical pregnancy rate (P < 0.05). Both groups had similar mean serum LH, progesterone, and E2 levels on trigger day. The control group had more premature LH rise than the study group, although this difference was not statistically significant. Conclusion In conclusion, it can be stated that the progesterone protocol and the GnRH-ant protocol exhibit similar rates of sudden premature LH surge in infertile patients. However, it is important to note that the two regiments differ in their outcomes in ART. Trial registration This study was retrospectively registered in the Iranian website (www.irct.ir) for clinical trials registration (http://www.irct.ir: IRCT-ID: IRCT20201029049183N, 2020-11-27).
引用
收藏
页码:1999 / 2008
页数:10
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [21] "Delayed start" gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol in Bologna poor-responders: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Cozzolino, Mauro
    Franasiak, Jason
    Andrisani, Alessandra
    Ambrosini, Guido
    Vitagliano, Amerigo
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2020, 244 : 154 - 162
  • [22] Short gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist versus flexible antagonist versus clomiphene citrate regimens in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization: a randomized controlled trial
    Schimberni, M.
    Ciardo, F.
    Schimberni, M.
    Giallonardo, A.
    De Pratti, V.
    Sbracia, M.
    EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2016, 20 (20) : 4354 - 4361
  • [23] Early initiation of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist in polycystic ovarian syndrome patients undergoing assisted reproduction: randomized controlled trial ISRCTN69937179
    Mostafa I. Abuzeid
    Mohamed Mitwally
    Yasmine M. Abuzeid
    Hammad A. Bokhari
    Mohammad Ashraf
    Michael P. Diamond
    Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2012, 29 : 1193 - 1202
  • [24] A Proof-of-Concept Clinical Trial of A Single Luteal Use of Long-Acting Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Antagonist Degarelix in Controlled Ovarian Stimulation for In Vitro Fertilization: Long Antagonist Protocol
    Papanikolaou, Evangelos G.
    Yarali, Hakan
    Timotheou, Evi
    Grynberg, Michael
    Zafeiratis, Odysseas
    Tournaye, Herman
    Najdecki, Robert
    FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2018, 9
  • [25] Continuous use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH)-agonist maintains high luteinizing hormone concentrations at the time of oocyte retrieval in women undergoing GnRH-agonist long protocol assisted reproductive technology treatment and stimulation with recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone
    Ohgi, Shirei
    Nakagawa, Koji
    Nakashima, Akira
    Horikawa, Takashi
    Sugiyama, Rikikazu
    Saito, Hidekazu
    ARCHIVES OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2009, 5 (01) : 74 - 79
  • [26] Micronized natural progesterone (Seidigestan®) vs GnRH antagonists for preventing the LH surge during controlled ovarian stimulation (PRO_NAT study): study protocol of a randomized clinical trial
    Martinez-Moya, M.
    Guerrero, J.
    Girela, J. L.
    Pitas, A.
    Bernabeu, A.
    Bernabeu, R.
    Castillo, J. C.
    FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [27] Comparison of a 'freeze-all' strategy including GnRH agonist trigger versus a 'fresh transfer' strategy including hCG trigger in assisted reproductive technology (ART): a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
    Stormlund, Sacha
    Lossl, Kristine
    Zedeler, Anne
    Bogstad, Jeanette
    Prtorius, Lisbeth
    Nielsen, Henriette Svarre
    Bungum, Mona
    Skouby, Sven O.
    Mikkelsen, Anne Lis
    Andersen, Anders Nyboe
    Bergh, Christina
    Humaidan, Peter
    Pinborg, Anja
    BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (07):