Does brand capital improve stock liquidity? Evidence from China

被引:1
作者
Majeed, Muhammad Ansar [1 ]
Ullah, Irfan [2 ]
Tariq, Samia [3 ]
Ahsan, Tanveer [4 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Gongshang Univ, Sch Accounting, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Jiangxi Normal Univ, Sch Finance, Nanchang 330022, Peoples R China
[3] Natl Coll Business Adm & Econ, Dept Business Adm, Sub Campus Multan, Multan, Pakistan
[4] Rennes Sch Business, Dept Finance, Rennes, France
关键词
adverse selection; brand capital; China; information asymmetry; NSOEs; stock liquidity; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; INFORMATION ASYMMETRY; CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; MARKET LIQUIDITY; FIRM VALUE; DISCLOSURE QUALITY; CROSS-SECTION; OWNERSHIP; INDUSTRY; EQUITY;
D O I
10.1002/ijfe.2918
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This study investigates how brand capital affects stock market liquidity. We posit that brand capital improves the corporate information environment, enhances competitiveness, and increases firm visibility ultimately resulting in higher stock liquidity. Using a sample of Chinese listed firms, we find a positive relationship between brand capital and stock liquidity. Further analyses show that the effect of brand capital is more pronounced for firms with low media coverage and analyst following. Moreover, the effect of brand capital on stock liquidity is significant for non-state-owned enterprises. Our mechanism analyses also confirm that brand capital plays an informational role by effectively mitigating information asymmetry and adverse selection, leading to higher stock liquidity. Our study provides the first evidence of the nexus between brand capital and stock liquidity and extends the literature on the capital market implications of brand capital.
引用
收藏
页码:382 / 404
页数:23
相关论文
共 110 条
  • [1] Leveraging the corporate brand
    Aaker, DA
    [J]. CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2004, 46 (03) : 6 - +
  • [2] THE FINANCIAL INFORMATION-CONTENT OF PERCEIVED QUALITY
    AAKER, DA
    JACOBSON, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1994, 31 (02) : 191 - 201
  • [3] Information asymmetry, R&D, and insider gains
    Aboody, D
    Lev, B
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2000, 55 (06) : 2747 - 2766
  • [4] Corporate governance and stock liquidity dimensions: Panel evidence from pure order-driven Australian market
    Ali, Searat
    Liu, Benjamin
    Su, Jen Je
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2017, 50 : 275 - 304
  • [5] Law, finance, and economic growth in China
    Allen, F
    Qian, J
    Qian, MJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2005, 77 (01) : 57 - 116
  • [6] Illiquidity and stock returns: cross-section and time-series effects
    Amihud, Y
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL MARKETS, 2002, 5 (01) : 31 - 56
  • [7] Do ESG Controversies Matter for Firm Value? Evidence from International Data
    Aouadi A.
    Marsat S.
    [J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2018, 151 (4) : 1027 - 1047
  • [8] Information demand and stock market liquidity: International evidence
    Aouadi, Amal
    Arouri, Mohamed
    Roubaud, David
    [J]. ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2018, 70 : 194 - 202
  • [9] Does exposure to foreign competition affect stock liquidity? Evidence from industry-level import data
    Atawnah, Nader
    Balachandran, Balasingham
    Huu Nhan Duong
    Podolski, Edward J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL MARKETS, 2018, 39 : 44 - 67
  • [10] ADVERTISING AND COORDINATION
    BAGWELL, K
    RAMEY, G
    [J]. REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1994, 61 (01) : 153 - 172