Phrenic nerve injury after atrial fibrillation ablation: different recovery courses among cryoballoon, laser balloon, and radiofrequency ablation

被引:1
|
作者
Shigeta, Takatoshi [1 ]
Miyazaki, Shinsuke [1 ]
Isonaga, Yuhei [2 ]
Arai, Hirofumi [3 ]
Miwa, Naoyuki [4 ]
Hayashi, Yosuke [5 ]
Kakehashi, Shota [6 ]
Inaba, Osamu [2 ]
Hachiya, Hitoshi [4 ]
Yamauchi, Yasuteru [3 ]
Nitta, Junichi [5 ]
Tada, Hiroshi [6 ]
Goya, Masahiko [1 ]
Sasano, Tetsuo [1 ]
机构
[1] Tokyo Med & Dent Univ, Dept Cardiovasc Med, 1-5-45 Yushima,Bunkyo Ku, Tokyo 1138510, Japan
[2] Japanese Red Cross Saitama Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Saitama, Japan
[3] Japan Red Cross Yokohama City Bay Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Yokohama, Japan
[4] Tsuchiura Kyodo Gen Hosp, Cardiovasc Ctr, Tsuchiura, Ibaraki, Japan
[5] Sakakibara Heart Inst, Dept Cardiol, Tokyo, Japan
[6] Univ Fukui, Fac Med Sci, Dept Cardiovasc Med, Fukui, Japan
关键词
Ablation; Atrial fibrillation; Phrenic nerve injury; Cryoballoon; Laser balloon; PULMONARY VEIN ISOLATION; CRYOABLATION; MULTICENTER;
D O I
10.1007/s00392-023-02365-3
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BackgroundPhrenic nerve injury (PNI) is one of the common complications in atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, which often recovers spontaneously. However, the course of its recovery has not been examined fully, especially in regard to the different ablation methods. We sought to compare the recovery course of PNI in cryoballoon, laser balloon, and radiofrequency ablation.MethodsThis multicenter retrospective study analyzed 355 patients who suffered from PNI during AF ablation. PNI occurred during cryoballoon ablation (CB group) and laser balloon ablation (LB group) for a pulmonary vein isolation in 288 and 20 patients, and radiofrequency ablation for a superior vena cava (SVC) isolation (RF-SVC group) in 47 patients, respectivelyResultsThere was a significant difference in the estimated probability of PNI recovery after the procedure between the methods (p = 0.01). PNI recovered significantly earlier in the CB group, especially within 24 h and 3 months post-procedure (the percentage of the recovery within 24 h and 3 months: 49.7% and 71.5% in the CB group, 15.0% and 22.2% in the LB group, and 23.4% and 41.9% in the RF-SVC group, respectively). Persistent PNI after 12 months was observed in only seven patients in the CB group, one in the LB group, and four in the RF-SVC group, respectively.ConclusionPNI rarely persists over 12 months after AF ablation; however, there is a difference in the timing of its recovery. PNI recovers quicker with cryoballoon ablation than with laser balloon ablation or radiofrequency ablation of the SVC.
引用
收藏
页码:72 / 82
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Phrenic nerve injury in atrial fibrillation ablation using balloon catheters: Incidence, characteristics, and clinical recovery course
    Tohoku, Shota
    Chen, Shaojie
    Last, Jana
    Bordignon, Stefano
    Bologna, Fabrizio
    Trolese, Luca
    Zanchi, Simone
    Bianchini, Lorenzo
    Schmidt, Boris
    Chun, K. R. Julian
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2020, 31 (08) : 1932 - 1941
  • [2] Quick, safe, and effective maneuver to prevent phrenic nerve injury during cryoballoon ablation of atrial fibrillation
    Okishige, Kaoru
    Aoyagi, Hideshi
    Shigeta, Takatoshi
    Nakamura, Rena A.
    Nishimura, Takuro
    Yamauchi, Yasuteru
    Keida, Takehiko
    Sasano, Tetsuo
    Hirao, Kenzo
    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2018, 53 (02) : 233 - 238
  • [3] Recordings of diaphragmatic electromyograms during cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation accurately predict phrenic nerve injury
    Lakhani, Mayur
    Saiful, Faisul
    Parikh, Valay
    Goyal, Nikhil
    Bekheit, Soad
    Kowalski, Marcin
    HEART RHYTHM, 2014, 11 (03) : 369 - 374
  • [4] Long-term course of phrenic nerve injury after cryoballoon ablation of atrial fibrillation
    Tokuda, Michifumi
    Yamashita, Seigo
    Sato, Hidenori
    Oseto, Hirotsuna
    Ikewaki, Hirotsugu
    Yokoyama, Masaaki
    Isogai, Ryota
    Tokutake, Ken-ichi
    Yokoyama, Ken-ichi
    Kato, Mika
    Narui, Ryohsuke
    Tanigawa, Shin-ichi
    Matsuo, Seiichiro
    Yoshimura, Michihiro
    Yamane, Teiichi
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)
  • [5] Cryoballoon ablation versus radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation
    Reissmann, Bruno
    Metzner, Andreas
    Kuck, Karl-Heinz
    TRENDS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2017, 27 (04) : 271 - 277
  • [6] Quick, safe, and effective maneuver to prevent phrenic nerve injury during cryoballoon ablation of atrial fibrillation
    Kaoru Okishige
    Hideshi Aoyagi
    Takatoshi Shigeta
    Rena A. Nakamura
    Takuro Nishimura
    Yasuteru Yamauchi
    Takehiko Keida
    Tetsuo Sasano
    Kenzo Hirao
    Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2018, 53 : 233 - 238
  • [7] Phrenic nerve paralysis during cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation: A comparison between the first- and second-generation balloon
    Casado-Arroyo, Ruben
    Chierchia, Gian-Battista
    Conte, Giulio
    Levinstein, Moises
    Sieira, Juan
    Rodriguez-Manero, Moises
    di Giovanni, Giacomo
    Baltogiannis, Yannis
    Wauters, Kristel
    de Asmundis, Carlo
    Sarkozy, Andrea
    Brugada, Pedro
    HEART RHYTHM, 2013, 10 (09) : 1318 - 1324
  • [8] Radiofrequency current or cryoballoon for ablation of atrial fibrillation? Hot or cold?
    Reissmann, B.
    Kuck, K. -H.
    Metzner, A.
    HERZ, 2017, 42 (04) : 352 - 356
  • [9] Chronic Ablation Lesions after Cryoballoon and Hot Balloon Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation
    Watanabe, Ryuta
    Okumura, Yasuo
    Nagashima, Koichi
    Wakamatsu, Yuji
    Yamada, Akimasa
    Kurokawa, Sayaka
    JOURNAL OF NIPPON MEDICAL SCHOOL, 2023, 90 (01) : 69 - 78
  • [10] Cryoballoon vs. laser balloon ablation for atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis
    Sun, Xiaochi
    Zhao, Shenyu
    Yu, Simin
    Cui, Kaijun
    FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2023, 10