Predicting primary cesarean delivery in pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus

被引:4
作者
Ramos, Sebastian Z. [1 ]
Lewkowitz, Adam K. [1 ]
Lord, Megan G. [1 ]
Has, Phinnara [2 ]
Danilack, Valery A. [3 ]
Savitz, David A. [1 ,4 ]
Werner, Erika F. [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Brown Univ, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Women & Infants Hosp,Warren Alpert Med Sch, Providence, RI 02912 USA
[2] Rhode Isl Hosp, Lifespan Biostat Epidemiol & Res Design, Providence, RI USA
[3] Yale Univ, Sch Med, New Haven, CT USA
[4] Brown Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Providence, RI USA
[5] Tufts Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Boston, MA USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
gestational diabetes; mode of delivery; prediction model; primary CD; BIRTH-WEIGHT; FETAL WEIGHT; RISK; DIAGNOSIS; MODELS; WOMEN; GAIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2023.06.002
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Prediction models have shown promise in helping clinicians and patients engage in shared decision-making by providing quantitative estimates of individual risk of important clinical outcomes. Gestational diabetes mellitus is a common complication of pregnancy, which places patients at higher risk of primary CD. Suspected fetal macrosomia diagnosed on prenatal ultrasound is a well-known risk factor for primary CD in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus, but tools incorporating multiple risk factors to provide more accurate CD risk are lacking. Such tools could help facilitate shared decision-making and risk reduction by identifying patients with both high and low chances of intrapartum primary CD.OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop and internally validate a multi-variable model to estimate the risk of intrapartum primary CD in pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus undergoing a trial of labor.STUDY DESIGN: This study identified a cohort of patients with gestational diabetes mellitus derived from a large, National Institutes of Health-funded medical record abstraction study who delivered singleton live-born infants at >= 34 weeks of gestation at a large tertiary care center between January 2002 and March 2013. The exclusion criteria included previous CD, contraindications to vaginal delivery, scheduled primary CD, and known fetal anomalies. Candidate predictors were clinical variables routinely available to a practitioner in the third trimester of pregnancy found to be associated with an increased risk of CD in gestational diabetes mellitus. Stepwise backward elimination was used to build the logistic regression model. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test was used to demonstrate goodness of fit. Model discrimination was evaluated via the concordance index and displayed as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Internal model validation was performed with bootstrapping of the original dataset. Random resampling with replacement was performed for 1000 replications to assess predictive ability. An additional analysis was performed in which the population was stratified by parity to evaluate the model's predictive ability among nulliparous and multiparous individuals.RESULTS: Of the 3570 pregnancies meeting the study criteria, 987 (28%) had a primary CD. Of note, 8 variables were included in the final model, all significantly associated with CD. They included large for gestational age, polyhydramnios, older maternal age, early pregnancy body mass index, first hemoglobin A1C recorded in pregnancy, nulliparity, insulin treatment, and preeclampsia. Model calibration and discrimination were satisfactory with the Hosmer-Lemeshow test (P1/4.862) and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.75 (95% confidence interval, 0.74-0.77). Internal validation demonstrated similar discriminatory ability. Stratification by parity demonstrated that the model worked well among both nulliparous and multiparous patients.CONCLUSION: Using information routinely available in the third trimester of pregnancy, a clinically pragmatic model can predict intra-partum primary CD risk with reasonable reliability in pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus and may provide quantitative data to guide patients in understanding their individual primary CD risk based on preexisting and acquired risk factors.
引用
收藏
页码:549.e1 / 549.e16
页数:16
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] The Sepsis in Obstetrics Score: a model to identify risk of morbidity from sepsis in pregnancy
    Albright, Catherine M.
    Ali, Tariq N.
    Lopes, Vrishali
    Rouse, Dwight J.
    Anderson, Brenna L.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 211 (01) : 39.e1 - 39.e8
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2019, OBSTET GYNECOL, V133, pE164, DOI 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003074
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2019, Obstet Gynecol, V133, P1, DOI [10.1097/AOG.0000000000003892, 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003018]
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2018, Obstet Gynecol, V131, pe49, DOI 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002501
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2017, Obstet Gynecol, V129, pe11, DOI 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001861
  • [6] [Anonymous], HLTH PEOPLE
  • [7] Indications Contributing to the Increasing Cesarean Delivery Rate
    Barber, Emma L.
    Lundsberg, Lisbet S.
    Belanger, Kathleen
    Pettker, Christian M.
    Funai, Edmund F.
    Illuzzi, Jessica L.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2011, 118 (01) : 29 - 38
  • [8] AMNIOTIC-FLUID VOLUME REFLECTS RECENT GLYCEMIC STATUS IN GESTATIONAL DIABETES-MELLITUS
    BARHAVA, I
    SCARPELLI, SA
    BARNHARD, Y
    DIVON, MY
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1994, 171 (04) : 952 - 955
  • [9] Prediction Model for Vaginal Birth After Induction of Labor in Women With Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy
    Beninati, Michael J.
    Ramos, Sebastian Z.
    Danilack, Valery A.
    Has, Phinnara
    Savitz, David A.
    Werner, Erika F.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 136 (02) : 402 - 410
  • [10] Racial and Ethnic Disparities Among Women Undergoing a Trial of Labor After Cesarean Delivery: Performance of the VBAC Calculator with and without Patients' Race/Ethnicity
    Buckley, Ayisha
    Sestito, Stephanie
    Ogundipe, Tonia
    Roig, Jacqueline
    Rosenberg, Henri Mitchell
    Cohen, Natalie
    Wang, Kelly
    Stoffels, Guillaume
    Janevic, Teresa
    DeBolt, Chelsea
    Cabrera, Camila
    Cochrane, Elizabeth
    Berkin, Jill
    Bianco, Angela
    Vieira, Luciana
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES, 2022, 29 (07) : 2030 - 2038