Optimization of a dual fuel engine based on multi-criteria decision-making methods

被引:4
|
作者
Shayan, Mostafa Esmaeili [1 ]
Najafi, Gholamhassan [2 ]
Lorenzini, Giulio [3 ]
机构
[1] Tarbiat Modares Univ, Dept Biosyst Engn Renewable Energy Syst, Tehran, Iran
[2] Tarbiat Modares Univ, Dept Biosyst Engn, Tehran, Iran
[3] Univ Parma, Dept Engn & Architecture, Parma, Italy
关键词
Response surface method; Taguchi method; Heavy-duty diesel engine; Optimization; TOPSIS; Environmental; DIESEL; GAS; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.tsep.2023.102055
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
The transportation sector's need for new fuels is being addressed through the development of optimization methods, and the use of combined and alternative fuels, which will prove to be both efficient and cost-effective. This paper utilizes a multi-criteria approach, including the response surface method and Taguchi method, to evaluate several alternative fuels for a heavy-duty diesel engine. The study considers a midterm horizon to address the issue of the near future. For this purpose, the economic effects and optimization of a natural gas and diesel fuel combination were evaluated. The optimization results showed that the engine operated best at a constant speed of 1400 rpm. The results indicate that when modeling combustion emissions with RSM, the effects of CO and NOx must be considered. When determining the optimal level of variables, it is important to increase the interval between the compression ratio and the start time of fuel injection until a specific level of emission reduction is achieved. Furthermore, Taguchi method has demonstrated that the impact of alterations in gas fuel and injection start time on the modeling of emission and performance parameters is more significant than that of other variables. The TOPSIS method was used to determine the economic, functional, and emission performance of different engine operation processes, it was found that the economic and functional criteria were aligned. However, the best solution for the environmental criterion was to focus on management.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Multi-criteria optimization and decision-making in radiotherapy
    Breedveld, Sebastiaan
    Craft, David
    van Haveren, Rens
    Heijmen, Ben
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2019, 277 (01) : 1 - 19
  • [2] When is a Decision-Making Method Trustworthy? Criteria for Evaluating Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods
    Saaty, Thomas L.
    Ergu, Daji
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & DECISION MAKING, 2015, 14 (06) : 1171 - 1187
  • [3] Multi-Criteria Decision-Making
    Encheva, Sylvia
    MICBE '09: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 10TH WSEAS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTERS IN BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS, 2009, : 192 - +
  • [4] Decision-making for multi-criteria optimization of process planning
    Arquis E.
    Delolme L.
    Antomarchi A.-L.
    Durieux S.
    Duc E.
    Mechanics and Industry, 2019, 20
  • [5] A comparative analysis of multi-criteria decision-making methods
    Ceballos B.
    Lamata M.T.
    Pelta D.A.
    Progress in Artificial Intelligence, 2016, 5 (04) : 315 - 322
  • [6] Multi-criteria decision-making methods based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets
    Liu, Hua-Wen
    Wang, Guo-Jun
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2007, 179 (01) : 220 - 233
  • [7] Estimation of weights in multi-criteria decision-making optimization models
    Chyna, Vladislav
    Kuncova, Martina
    Seknickova, Jana
    PROCEEDINGS OF 30TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE MATHEMATICAL METHODS IN ECONOMICS, PTS I AND II, 2012, : 355 - 360
  • [8] Structure of multi-criteria decision-making
    Brugha, C
    JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2004, 55 (11) : 1156 - 1168
  • [9] Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods in Bipolar Fuzzy Environment
    M. A. Alghamdi
    Noura Omair Alshehri
    Muhammad Akram
    International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 2018, 20 : 2057 - 2064
  • [10] A review of multi-criteria decision-making methods for bioenergy systems
    Scott, James A.
    Ho, William
    Dey, Prasanta K.
    ENERGY, 2012, 42 (01) : 146 - 156