Predicting EFL expository writing quality with measures of lexical richness

被引:10
作者
Yang, Yang [1 ]
Yap, Ngee Thai [1 ]
Ali, Afida Mohamad [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Putra Malaysia, Fac Modern Languages & Commun, Dept English Language, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia
关键词
Lexical richness; EFL writing; Expository writing; Writing quality; VOCABULARY; SOPHISTICATION; LEARNERS; STUDENTS; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1016/j.asw.2023.100762
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This paper investigates the relationship between lexical richness and EFL expository writing quality and examines the predictability of lexical richness indices to EFL expository writing quality. Two hundred and seventy expository writing samples were drawn from Spoken and Written English Corpus of Chinese Learners Version 2.0. The lexical richness of the writing samples was analyzed with Lexical Complexity Analyzer, and the values of the 26 indices were calculated being the independent variables to predict the EFL expository writing quality. Besides, the writing samples were rated by three experienced raters and the average scores from the three raters were used as the dependent variable. The results of correlation analysis show that all four measures of lexical richness, i.e., lexical density, sophistication, variation, and fluency, are significantly correlated with the EFL expository writing quality, but the strength of the correlation is either low or medium. The results of regression analysis show that two indices of lexical richness, i.e., Number of Words and Noun Variation, can explain 38.5% (r = 0.620, p = 0.000) of the variance in the average score of EFL expository writing. A 10-fold cross-validation was performed and the results indicate that the model validly fits the data and can be generalized with unseen data.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]  
Ai H., 2010, 27 ANN S COMPUTER AS, P8
[2]   NEW LOOK AT STATISTICAL-MODEL IDENTIFICATION [J].
AKAIKE, H .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 1974, AC19 (06) :716-723
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1998, 17 U HAW 2 LANG TEAC
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1964, Language and Thought
[5]  
Astridya F. W., 2018, LINGUAL J LANGUAGE C, V5, P23, DOI [10.24843/LJLC.2018.v05.i01.p04, DOI 10.24843/LJLC.2018.V05.I01.P04]
[6]  
Berger CM, 2017, EDUC TECHNOL SOC, V20, P201
[7]   Beyond single-word measures: L2 writing assessment, lexical richness and formulaic competence [J].
Bestgen, Yves .
SYSTEM, 2017, 69 :65-78
[8]  
Biber D., 1991, Variation across speech and writing
[9]  
Casanave C.P., 1994, Journal of Second Language Writing, V3, P179, DOI [10.1016/1060-3743(94)90016-7, DOI 10.1016/1060-3743(94)90016-7]
[10]  
Chaudron C., 1990, Studies in Second Language Acquisition, V12, P43, DOI DOI 10.1017/S0272263100008731