Is Full-Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Superior to Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Single-Level Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis? A Retrospective Study

被引:1
作者
Yin, Jianjian [1 ]
Jiang, Xijia [1 ]
Xu, Nanwei [1 ]
Nong, Luming [1 ]
Jiang, Yuqing [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Med Univ, Affiliated Changzhou Peoples Hosp 2, Dept Orthoped, Changzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Med Univ, Affiliated Changzhou Peoples Hosp 2, Dept Orthoped, 29 Xing Long Xiang, Changzhou 213003, Peoples R China
关键词
degenerative spondylolisthesis; full-endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion; TLIF; percutaneous pedicle screw; CONSERVATIVE MANAGEMENT; SPINAL STENOSIS; DISKECTOMY; SURGERY; COMPLICATIONS; DECOMPRESSION; INTERLAMINAR; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1055/a-1994-7857
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background In this study, we evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of full-endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for treatment of single-level lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis.Methods Fifty-three patients were divided into two groups according to the surgical techniques: Full endoscopic (Endo)-TLIF ( n = 25) and TLIF ( n = 28). Clinical efficacy was evaluated pre- and postoperatively. The operation time, operative blood loss, postoperative amount of serum creatine phosphokinase (CPK), postoperative drainage volume, postoperative hospital stay time, total cost, and operative complications were also recorded.Results Compared with the TLIF group, the Endo-TLIF group had similar intraoperative blood loss, less postoperative increased CPK, less postoperative drainage volume, and shorter postoperative hospital stay, but longer operative time and higher total cost. The postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) scores of back and leg pain and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores significantly improved compared with the preoperative scores in both two groups; more significant improvement of postoperative VAS scores of back pain and ODI scores were shown in the Endo-TLIF group at the 1-month follow-up ( p < 0.05). No difference was found in the intervertebral fusion rate between the two groups.Conclusion The Endo-TLIF has similar clinical effect compared with the TLIF for the treatment of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. It also has many surgical advantages such as less muscle trauma, less postoperative back pain, and fast functional recovery of the patient. However, steep learning curve, longer operative time, and higher total cost may be the disadvantages that limit this technique. Also, the Endo-TLIF treatment of patients with bilateral lateral recess stenosis is considered a relative contraindication.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 47
页数:9
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Serum creatine phosphokinase levels as an indicator of muscle injury following lumbar disc surgery: Comparison of fully endoscopic discectomy and microdiscectomy [J].
Akcakaya, Mehmet Osman ;
Yorukoglu, Ali Guven ;
Aydoseli, Aydin ;
Aras, Yavuz ;
Sabanci, Pulat Akin ;
Altunrende, Muhittin Emre ;
Dolgun, Muge ;
Goker, Burcu ;
Sencan, Fahir ;
Ali, Achmet ;
Sencer, Altay .
CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2016, 145 :74-78
[2]   Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis Definition, Natural History, Conservative Management, and Surgical Treatment [J].
Bydon, Mohamad ;
Alvi, Mohammed Ali ;
Goyal, Anshit .
NEUROSURGERY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2019, 30 (03) :299-+
[3]   A Comparison of Minimally Invasive and Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Grade 1 Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: An Analysis of the Prospective Quality Outcomes Database [J].
Chan, Andrew K. ;
Bisson, Erica F. ;
Bydon, Mohamad ;
Foley, Kevin T. ;
Glassman, Steven D. ;
Shaffrey, Christopher, I ;
Wang, Michael Y. ;
Park, Paul ;
Potts, Eric A. ;
Shaffrey, Mark E. ;
Coric, Domagoj ;
Knightly, John J. ;
Fu, Kai-Ming ;
Slotkin, Jonathan R. ;
Asher, Anthony L. ;
Virk, Michael S. ;
Kerezoudis, Panagiotis ;
Alvi, Mohammed A. ;
Guan, Jian ;
Haid, Regis W. ;
Mummaneni, Praveen, V .
NEUROSURGERY, 2020, 87 (03) :555-562
[4]   Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in lumbar spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
de Kunder, Suzanne L. ;
van Kuijk, Sander M. J. ;
Rijkers, Kim ;
Caelers, Inge J. M. H. ;
van Hemert, Wouter L. W. ;
de Bie, Rob A. ;
van Santbrink, Henk .
SPINE JOURNAL, 2017, 17 (11) :1712-1721
[5]   Regional anesthesia versus general anesthesia for surgery on the lumbar spine: A review of the modern literature [J].
De Rojas, Joaquin O. ;
Syre, Peter ;
Welch, William C. .
CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2014, 119 :39-43
[6]   Current trends in the management of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis [J].
Ferrero, Emmanuelle ;
Guigui, Pierre .
EFORT OPEN REVIEWS, 2018, 3 (05) :192-199
[7]   Cross-sectional area of human trunk paraspinal muscles before and after posterior lumbar surgery using magnetic resonance imaging [J].
Ghiasi, Mohammad S. ;
Arjmand, Navid ;
Shirazi-Adl, Aboulfazl ;
Farahmand, Farzam ;
Hashemi, Hassan ;
Bagheri, Sahar ;
Valizadeh, Mahsa .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2016, 25 (03) :774-782
[9]   Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Following Lumbar Endoscopic Unilateral Laminotomy Bilateral Decompression and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for One-Level Lumbar Spinal Stenosis With Degenerative Spondylolisthesis [J].
Hua, Wenbin ;
Wang, Bingjin ;
Ke, Wencan ;
Xiang, Qian ;
Wu, Xinghuo ;
Zhang, Yukun ;
Li, Shuai ;
Yang, Shuhua ;
Wu, Qiang ;
Yang, Cao .
FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2021, 7
[10]   Diagnosis and conservative management of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis [J].
Kalichman, Leonid ;
Hunter, David J. .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2008, 17 (03) :327-335