Assessing uncertainty in hydrological projections arising from local-scale internal variability of climate

被引:6
作者
Yuan, Qifen [1 ,2 ]
Thorarinsdottir, Thordis L. [3 ]
Beldring, Stein [1 ]
Wong, Wai Kwok [1 ]
Xu, Chong-Yu [2 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Water Resources & Energy Directorate NVE, Oslo, Norway
[2] Univ Oslo UiO, Dept Geosci, Oslo, Norway
[3] Norwegian Comp Ctr NR, Oslo, Norway
关键词
Local-scale internal variability; Uncertainty; Gridded weather generator; Spatially distributed HBV-model; ANOVA; Climate change impact; CHANGE IMPACTS; RUNOFF MODEL; PRECIPITATION; SENSITIVITY; PARAMETERS; COMPONENTS; ENSEMBLE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129415
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Hydrological impact assessments are increasingly performed at fine spatial , temporal resolutions in order to resolve local-scale changes under a future climate. Apart from the uncertainty represented by different climate models, emission scenarios and post-processing methods, the local-scale internal variability of the climate can be a major source of uncertainty for hydrological projections. To assess the latter at the catchment scale, this paper presents a methodology which is particularly suitable for spatially distributed hydrological models. An ensemble of daily precipitation and daily mean temperature realizations on a high-resolution grid is simulated from stochastic weather generators (WGs) trained on historical data and equipped with climate change information obtained from a regional climate model. Based on the resulting simulated daily runoff data, the significance of changes in the runoff regime is assessed using a statistical hypothesis test , the variability contributed by the two input variables is quantified using the analysis of variance (ANOVA). As a proof of concept, simulations on a 1-km grid over a period of 19 years are carried out for nine catchments in central Norway. Significant changes in runoff regimes are found, indicating that the trends introduced in the WGs are not overwhelmed by the local-scale internal variability. Variability in the runoff simulations varies substantially throughout the year; it is highest in periods with potential snowmelt and lowest during winter. Temperature is the dominant source of variability in the colder months (November-March) due to its influence on rainfall and snowmelt. High variability in May-June is contributed comparably by both temperature and precipitation. In summer and early autumn the runoff variability is precipitation dominated. The results are in line with findings in the literature where the runoff variability is driven by the large-scale internal climate variability. This indicates that ignoring the local-scale internal variability may yield an underestimation of the overall variability in runoff projections and projected changes.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 59 条
  • [1] Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis of the conceptual HBV rainfall-runoff model: Implications for parameter estimation
    Abebe, Nibret A.
    Ogden, Fred L.
    Pradhan, Nawa R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2010, 389 (3-4) : 301 - 310
  • [2] A comprehensive assessment of water storage dynamics and hydroclimatic extremes in the Chao Phraya River Basin during 2002-2020
    Abhishek
    Kinouchi, Tsuyoshi
    Sayama, Takahiro
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2021, 603 (603)
  • [3] Synergetic application of GRACE gravity data, global hydrological model, and in-situ observations to quantify water storage dynamics over Peninsular India during 2002-2017
    Abhishek
    Kinouchi, Tsuyoshi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2021, 596
  • [4] Robust changes and sources of uncertainty in the projected hydrological regimes of Swiss catchments
    Addor, Nans
    Roessler, Ole
    Koeplin, Nina
    Huss, Matthias
    Weingartner, Rolf
    Seibert, Jan
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2014, 50 (10) : 7541 - 7562
  • [5] Barros V. R., 2014, IPCC 2014 CLIMATE CH
  • [6] Estimation of parameters in a distributed precipitation-runoff model for Norway
    Beldring, S
    Engeland, K
    Roald, LA
    Sælthun, NR
    Vokso, A
    [J]. HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2003, 7 (03) : 304 - 316
  • [7] Beldring S, 2008, TELLUS A, V60, P439, DOI 10.1111/J.1600-0870.2008.00306.X
  • [8] Bergstrom S, 1976, DEV APPL CONCEPTUAL
  • [9] Quantifying uncertainty sources in an ensemble of hydrological climate-impact projections
    Bosshard, T.
    Carambia, M.
    Goergen, K.
    Kotlarski, S.
    Krahe, P.
    Zappa, M.
    Schaer, C.
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2013, 49 (03) : 1523 - 1536
  • [10] Collins M, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2013: THE PHYSICAL SCIENCE BASIS, P1029