Benchmarking in a beef cattle breeding program: Lessons from the best breeders

被引:2
作者
Toral, Fabio Luiz Buranelo [1 ]
Menezes, Gilberto Romeiro de Oliveira [2 ]
da Silva, Luiz Otavio Campos [2 ,3 ]
Martin Nieto, Leonardo [4 ]
de Souza, Maury Dorta [4 ]
Torres, Roberto Augusto de Almeida [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
[2] Embrapa Gado Corte, Campo Grande, Brazil
[3] Memoriam, Embrapa Gado Corte, Campo Grande, Brazil
[4] Geneplus Consultoria Agr Ltda, Campo Grande, Brazil
关键词
embryo transfer; generation interval; genetic merit; genetic trend; in vitro fertilization; selection; GENETIC EVALUATION; DAIRY-CATTLE; SELECTION; PEDIGREE;
D O I
10.1111/jbg.12757
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Beef cattle breeding programs offer genetic evaluations and consulting services on animal breeding practices to help breeders improve the genetic merit of their herds. Some breeders are more willing to apply best practices and technologies than others. Consequently, the average genetic merit and genetic trends differ across herds. We benchmarked some parameters of an average herd (AVE) and the corresponding parameters of herds with higher genetic merit (TOP), both participating in a commercial Nellore breeding program. Expected progeny differences (EPD) for growth, reproductive and carcass traits and a selection index (SI) of animals born from 2005 to 2019 on 128 farms located in Brazil, Bolivia and Paraguay were used to compute the AVE parameters. The 20 herds with higher mean SI of animals born in the last five birth seasons were classified as TOP herds. The mean SI and EPD of animals born in the last five seasons in the TOP herds were, respectively, 89% and 79% to 206% higher (p <= 0.001) than those of animals from the AVE herd. Genetic trends over the entire period were also higher (50% for SI and 31% to 88% separately for each trait, p <= 0.006) in the TOP herds compared to the AVE herd. Although the difference in the numbers of cows, bulls and calves between the TOP and AVE herds did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.175, p = 0.273 and p = 0.061, respectively), the numbers of progeny per cow and per bull were 21% (p = 0.012) and 26% (p = 0.047) higher in the TOP herds, respectively. Multiple ovulation and embryo transfer and in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (MOET/IVF) accounted for a higher percentage of births in the TOP herds compared to AVE (24.6% vs. 12.5%, p = 0.002). The generation interval was 17% shorter (p < 0.001) in the TOP herds compared to AVE. The average inbreeding coefficient of animals from the TOP herds (1.08 +/- 0.52%) did not differ (p = 0.78) from that of AVE animals (1.26 +/- 0.96%). In general, AVE herds are evolving in the desirable direction but differences in genetic merit between AVE and TOP herds are increasing over time. The more frequent use of MOET/IVF, a lower cow-to-bull ratio, and a larger family size (progeny per cow or per bull) can help achieve larger selection differentials and increase genetic trends and average genetic merits of TOP herds compared to AVE herds.
引用
收藏
页码:287 / 294
页数:8
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] ABCZ, 2021, SIST INT AV GEN PMGZ
  • [2] Hot topic: A unified approach to utilize phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information for genetic evaluation of Holstein final score
    Aguilar, I.
    Misztal, I.
    Johnson, D. L.
    Legarra, A.
    Tsuruta, S.
    Lawlor, T. J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2010, 93 (02) : 743 - 752
  • [3] Genetic association between different criteria to define sexual precocious heifers with growth, carcass, reproductive and feed efficiency indicator traits in Nellore cattle using genomic information
    Bonamy, Martin
    Kluska, Sabrina
    Peripolli, Elisa
    Antunes de Lemos, Marcos Vinicius
    Amorim, Sabrina Thaise
    Jose Vaca, Roberto
    Lobo, Raysildo Barbosa
    de Castro, Leticia Mendes
    de Faria, Carina Ubirajara
    Ferrari, Fabio Borba
    Baldi, Fernando
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL BREEDING AND GENETICS, 2019, 136 (01) : 15 - 22
  • [4] Phenotypic and Genetic Correlations of Feed Efficiency Traits with Growth and Carcass Traits in Nellore Cattle Selected for Postweaning Weight
    Ceacero, Thais Matos
    Zerlotti Mercadante, Maria Eugenia
    dos Santos Goncalves Cyrillo, Joslaine Noely
    Canesin, Roberta Carrilho
    Martins Bonilha, Sarah Figueiredo
    de Albuquerque, Lucia Galvao
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (08):
  • [5] CEPEA, 2022, IND ASBIA 2021 MID
  • [6] Effect of mating types and mating ratios in the selection based on BLUP
    Cunha, EE
    Euclydes, RF
    Torres, RDA
    Lopes, PS
    Ribeiro, JI
    Carneiro, PCS
    [J]. REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ZOOTECNIA-BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2003, 32 (06): : 1297 - 1303
  • [7] Genetic evaluation for reproductive and productive traits in Brahman cattle
    de Oliveira Bessa, Ayrton Fernandes
    Herculano Duarte, Igor Nelson
    Rola, Luciana Diniz
    Bernardes, Priscila Arrigucci
    Neto, Severino Gonzaga
    Lobo, Raysildo Barbosa
    Munari, Danisio Prado
    Buzanskas, Marcos Eli
    [J]. THERIOGENOLOGY, 2021, 173 : 261 - 268
  • [8] Falconer D. S., 1996, Introduction to quantitative genetics.
  • [9] Changes in genetic selection differentials and generation intervals in US Holstein dairy cattle as a result of genomic selection
    Garcia-Ruiz, Adriana
    Cole, John B.
    VanRaden, Paul M.
    Wiggans, George R.
    Ruiz-Lopez, Felipe J.
    Van Tassell, Curtis P.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2016, 113 (28) : E3995 - E4004
  • [10] Optimizing female allocation to reproductive technologies considering merit, inbreeding and cost in nucleus breeding programmes with genomic selection
    Granleese, Tom
    Clark, Samuel A.
    Kinghorn, Brian P.
    van der Werf, Julius H. J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL BREEDING AND GENETICS, 2019, 136 (02) : 79 - 90