Comparative Study Between Closed Reduction Internal Fixation Alone Versus Closed Reduction Internal Fixation and Addition of Muscle Pedicle Bone Graft for Prevention of Osteonecrosis in Cases of Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures

Background In patients of less than 60 years of age, osteosynthesis is the treatment of choice for displaced femoral neck fractures (Garden 3 and 4). Most of these fractures unite well but chances of osteonecrosis are quite high even after early operations and till date there is no well-defined method of prediction and prevention of osteonecrosis. Vascularized bone graft may prevent the development of osteonecrosis.Materials and Methods This is a retrospective case control study done in an urban Medical College in eastern India and tried to evaluate efficacy of addition of quadratus femoris muscle pedicle bone graft in cases of osteosynthesis comparing the results of cases treated with closed reduction and internal fixation alone for femoral neck fractures We have taken into consideration 45 consecutive cases from each group with identical demographic background and of very similar age pattern of 20 years to 60 years.For further reference, we will describe Group I for closed reduction and CHS/DHS only, and Group II for closed reduction CHS and quadratus femoris muscle pedicle graft.Results Satisfactory bony union occurred in 42 out of 45 follow-up patients in Group 1 (93.3%) and 43 out of 45 patients in Group 2. (95.5%) In 2- to 10-year follow-up period, eight patients (18.6%) developed osteonecrosis in Group I, and in Group 2, in the same period, there were no cases of osteonecrosis.Conclusion Addition of quadratus femoris muscle pedicle bone graft is a very effective procedure for prevention of osteonecrosis when we attempt osteosynthesis by closed reduction and internal fixation for displaced femoral neck fractures.