The development and validation of a positive and negative outcome expectation scale for re-donation among blood donors

被引:2
作者
Hu, Huahua [1 ]
Hu, Wei [2 ]
Hu, Qiuyue [2 ]
Kuang, Hujiao [3 ]
Mo, Phoenix K. H. [1 ]
Lau, Joseph Tak Fai [1 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Fac Med, Ctr Hlth Behav Res, JC Sch Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Blood Ctr Zhejiang Prov, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Guangdong Med Univ, Dongguan, Peoples R China
[4] Wenzhou Med Univ, Kangning Hosp, Wenzhou, Peoples R China
[5] Wenzhou Med Univ, Sch Mental Hlth, Wenzhou, Peoples R China
[6] Zhejiang Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
关键词
Positive and negative outcome expectation; Scale development; Validation; Blood donation behavior; Re-donation intention; Blood donors; SOCIAL COGNITIVE THEORY; SELF-EFFICACY; GENDER SIMILARITIES; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY; BEHAVIOR; SATISFACTION; RETENTION; INTENTION; DECISIONS;
D O I
10.1007/s12144-022-03370-x
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Blood donor retention is an effective way to improve blood safety and maintain a stable blood supply. According to the social cognition theory, outcome expectation is an important determinant of behavioral maintenance. However, no outcome expectation scale for blood donation is available in the literature. The aim of the present study was to develop and validate a positive outcome expectation scale (POES) and a negative outcome expectation scale (NOES) for re-donation among blood donors. In Study 1, a total of 12 items for POES and 7 items for NOES were developed. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was performed to examine the factor structure of the two scales among a convenience sample of 155 college student blood donors in China (100 females, 55 males; M-age = 20.23 +/- 1.94). In Study 2, the factor structure was further validated with a second convenience sample of 164 blood donors recruited from blood collection sites (79 female, 85 males; M-age = 25.68 +/- 7.87) using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The internal consistency, convergent validity, discrimination validity and criterion validity were also tested. In Study 1, one item from NOES with a communality value lower than .30 was deleted. A three-factor structure for POES and a two-factor structure for NOES were established through the EFA. These factor structures were further supported by the CFA in Study 2. Both POES and NOES showed satisfactory internal consistency, convergent validity, discrimination validity and criterion validity. The POES and NOES demonstrated good reliability and validity in measuring the positive and negative outcome expectations of re-donation among blood donors. The two scales can be utilized in research and practice in predicting and promoting blood re-donation.
引用
收藏
页码:23903 / 23916
页数:14
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]  
Ajzen I., 1980, UNDERSTANDING ATTITU
[2]   Role of self-efficacy, outcome expectation, and outcome expectancy in promoting oral health behaviors in adolescent girls [J].
Alidosti, Masoumeh ;
Tavassoli, Elahe .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATION AND HEALTH PROMOTION, 2020, 9 (01)
[3]   Self-regulation, self-efficacy, outcome expectations, and social support: Social cognitive theory and nutrition behavior [J].
Anderson, Eileen S. ;
Winett, Richard A. ;
Wojcik, Janet R. .
ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2007, 34 (03) :304-312
[4]   Sex differences in moral judgements across 67 countries [J].
Atari, Mohammad ;
Lai, Mark H. C. ;
Dehghani, Morteza .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2020, 287 (1937)
[5]   How Can We Improve Retention of the First-Time Donor? A Systematic Review of the Current Evidence [J].
Bagot, Kathleen L. ;
Murray, Andrea L. ;
Masser, Barbara M. .
TRANSFUSION MEDICINE REVIEWS, 2016, 30 (02) :81-91
[6]   Specifying the determinants of the initiation and maintenance of behavior change: An examination of self-efficacy, satisfaction, and smoking cessation [J].
Baldwin, Austin S. ;
Rothman, Alexander J. ;
Hertel, Andrew W. ;
Linde, Jennifer A. ;
Jeffery, Robert W. ;
Finch, Emily A. ;
Lando, Harry A. .
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 25 (05) :626-634
[7]   Health promotion by social cognitive means [J].
Bandura, A .
HEALTH EDUCATION & BEHAVIOR, 2004, 31 (02) :143-164
[8]   The anatomy of stages of change [J].
Bandura, A .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH PROMOTION, 1997, 12 (01) :8-10
[9]   Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective [J].
Bandura, A .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 52 :1-26
[10]  
Bandura A., 1986, SOCIAL FDN THOUGHT A