Mapping the policy space of public consultations: evidence from the European Union

被引:0
作者
Bunea, Adriana [1 ,2 ]
Wuest, Reto [1 ]
Lipcean, Sergiu [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bergen, Dept Comparat Polit, Bergen, Norway
[2] Univ Bergen, Dept Comparat Polit, Christies Gate 15, N-5020 Bergen, Norway
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
European Commission; public consultations; preference aggregation; dimensionality of policy space; regulatory governance; Specific Multiple Correspondence Analysis; POLITICAL SPACE; DIMENSIONALITY; CONTESTATION; RULEMAKING; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1080/13501763.2024.2320836
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Public consultations strengthen the informational advantage and policy legitimacy of bureaucracies by allowing them to collect and aggregate information on stakeholder preferences. How well consultations perform this function depends on the dimensional structure and complexity of the policy spaces describing them. Building on the research on spatial models of politics, we derive a set of expectations about the dimensional structure and policy content of consultation policy spaces. We assess our argument empirically by analysing 42 consultations organised by the European Commission via online surveys across all policy areas. Using Specific Multiple Correspondence Analysis (SMCA) we find that more than 70% of the analysed consultations present low-dimensional policy spaces characterised by one or two main dimensions, although some also display a three-dimensional space. The substantive content of policy dimensions is consultation-specific and varies greatly across events. Most dimensions capture stakeholder alignments with respect to policy instruments, and only a few with respect to the orientation of the policy regime. The unveiled consultation policy spaces reflect a regulatory model of stakeholder engagement in policymaking. Our findings underscore the challenges and opportunities of information provision, preference aggregation and the identification of stable majority equilibria in the context of public consultations and bureaucratic policymaking.
引用
收藏
页码:755 / 783
页数:29
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Access to climate policy-making in the European Union and in Norway
    Gullberg, Anne Therese
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS, 2011, 20 (04) : 464 - 484
  • [22] Analysis of the RES Potential in Accordance with the Energy Policy of the European Union
    Jalowiec, Tomasz
    Wojtaszek, Henryk
    ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (19)
  • [23] Improving the explanatory power of bargaining models - New evidence from European Union studies
    Selck, TJ
    JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL POLITICS, 2005, 17 (03) : 371 - 375
  • [24] Emotional citizens, detached interest groups? The use of emotional language in public policy consultations
    Fink, Simon
    Ruffing, Eva
    Burst, Tobias
    Chinnow, Sara Katharina
    POLICY SCIENCES, 2023, 56 (03) : 469 - 497
  • [25] Emotional citizens, detached interest groups? The use of emotional language in public policy consultations
    Simon Fink
    Eva Ruffing
    Tobias Burst
    Sara Katharina Chinnow
    Policy Sciences, 2023, 56 : 469 - 497
  • [26] The influence of carbon risk on firm value: Evidence from the European Union Emission Trading Scheme
    Dewaelheyns, Nico
    Schoubben, Frederiek
    Struyfs, Kristof
    Van Hulle, Cynthia
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2023, 344
  • [27] The structure of public opinion on crime policy: Evidence from seven Caribbean nations
    Maguire, Edward
    Johnson, Devon
    PUNISHMENT & SOCIETY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PENOLOGY, 2015, 17 (04): : 502 - 530
  • [28] Lobbying as a collective enterprise: winners and losers of policy formulation in the European Union
    Kluever, Heike
    JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN PUBLIC POLICY, 2013, 20 (01) : 59 - 76
  • [29] Policy evaluation and gender mainstreaming in the European Union: the perfect (mis)match?
    Minto, Rachel
    Mergaert, Lut
    Bustelo, Maria
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF POLITICS AND GENDER, 2020, 3 (02): : 277 - 294
  • [30] Policy outlook: Recent evolutions of maritime spatial planning in the European Union
    Friess, Bernhard
    Gremaud-Colombier, Marie
    MARINE POLICY, 2021, 132