Is removal and destruction of perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances from wastewater effluent affordable?

被引:2
作者
Ling, Alison L. [1 ]
Vermace, Rebecca R. [1 ]
McCabe, Andrew J. [1 ]
Wolohan, Kathryn M. [1 ]
Kyser, Scott J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Barr Engn Co, 4300 MarketPointe Dr,Suite 200, Minneapolis, MN 55435 USA
[2] Minnesota Pollut Control Agcy, St Paul, MN USA
关键词
cost burden; perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS); PFAS destruction; PFAS treatment; wastewater affordability; water resource recovery facility (WRRF); MEMBRANE BIOREACTORS; MUNICIPAL; TRANSPORT; COST; FATE;
D O I
10.1002/wer.10975
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Several jurisdictions are currently evaluating regulatory standards for perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in municipal water resource recovery facility (WRRF) effluent. Effective and responsible implementation of PFAS effluent limits should consider the costs and capabilities of currently available technologies, because the costs of meeting WRRF PFAS limits could disproportionally fall to ratepayers. Cost curves were developed for currently available PFAS separation and destruction options, assuming effluent treatment targets near current analytical detection limits. Removing and destroying PFAS from municipal WRRF effluent is estimated to increase costs per household by a factor of between 2 and 210, using Minnesota-specific data as an example. Estimated costs per household would increase more for residents of smaller communities, averaging 33% of median household income (MHHI) in communities smaller than 1000 people. This exceeds the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)-developed affordability index of 2% of MHHI by a factor of 16. Estimated costs per household to remove and destroy PFAS varied among locations, primarily based on WRRF and community size, median income, rural versus urban, and type of wastewater treatment processes currently used.Practitioner Points Required tertiary treatment before WRRF effluent PFAS separation, using currently available technologies, is a significant portion (similar to 40-80%) of estimated costs. Adding PFAS separation, destruction, and pre-treatment would make Minnesota wastewater rates unaffordable (defined by EPA affordability guidance) without external funding. The estimated cost per household is higher for smaller communities and would require substantial external funding to maintain rate affordability. Design and operating uncertainties remain for full-scale WRRF retrofits to consistently remove and destroy effluent PFAS with limited full-scale applications.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Poly- and Perfluoroalkyl Substances in Seawater and Plankton from the Northwestern Atlantic Margin
    Zhang, Xianming
    Lohrnann, Rainer
    Sunderland, Elsie M.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 53 (21) : 12348 - 12356
  • [42] Global patterns and temporal trends of perfluoroalkyl substances in municipal wastewater: A meta-analysis
    Cookson, Esther S.
    Detwiler, Russell L.
    WATER RESEARCH, 2022, 221
  • [43] Destruction of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) via Lacasse Enzymatic Degradation and Electrochemical Advanced Oxidation
    Broman, Julia
    Ceja, Angela
    Godoy, Teresa
    Rivera, Dulce Rodriguez
    Dionne, Page
    Schipper, Joshua
    Henkemeyer, Sara
    Cegielski, Sabrina
    Wong, Gracie
    Kaur, Anmol
    2021 WASTE-MANAGEMENT EDUCATION RESEARCH CONFERENCE (WERC), 2021,
  • [44] Biosolids, an important route for transporting poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances from wastewater treatment plants into the environment: A systematic review
    Behnami, Ali
    Benis, Khaled Zoroufchi
    Pourakbar, Mojtaba
    Yeganeh, Mojtaba
    Esrafili, Ali
    Gholami, Mitra
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 925
  • [45] Perfluoroalkyl substances and pharmaceuticals removal in full-scale drinking water treatment plants
    Kim, Ki Yong
    Ekpe, Okon Dominic
    Lee, Heon-Jun
    Oh, Jeong-Eun
    JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2020, 400
  • [46] Input characterization of perfluoroalkyl substances in wastewater treatment plants: Source discrimination by exploratory data analysis
    Xiao, Feng
    Halbach, Thomas R.
    Simcik, Matt F.
    Gulliver, John S.
    WATER RESEARCH, 2012, 46 (09) : 3101 - 3109
  • [47] Distribution and fate of perfluoroalkyl substances in municipal wastewater treatment plants in economically developed areas of China
    Zhang, Wei
    Zhang, Yating
    Taniyasu, Sachi
    Yeung, Leo W. Y.
    Lam, Paul K. S.
    Wang, Jianshe
    Li, Xinhai
    Yamashita, Nobuyoshi
    Dai, Jiayin
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2013, 176 : 10 - 17
  • [48] Release of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances from Municipal and Construction and Demolition Waste Landfills and Wastewater Treatment Plants in North Carolina
    Thelusmond, Jean-Rene
    Sardarmehni, Mojtaba
    Destefano, Noelle
    Weed, Rebecca
    Knappe, Detlef R. U.
    Barlaz, Morton A.
    ACS ES&T WATER, 2025,
  • [49] Occurrence, Removal, and Risk Assessment of Antimicrobials and Their Transformation Products in Effluent from Australian Wastewater Treatment Plants
    Li, Jinglong
    O'Brien, Jake W.
    Tscharke, Ben J.
    Verhagen, Rory
    He, Chang
    Shimko, Katja M.
    Shao, Xueting
    Zhai, Naixiang
    Hulleman, Tobias
    Mueller, Jochen F.
    Thomas, Kevin V.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2025, 59 (13) : 6825 - 6838
  • [50] Comparative bibliometric trends of microplastics and perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances: how these hot environmental remediation research topics developed over time
    Bakhshoodeh, Reza
    Santos, Rafael M.
    RSC ADVANCES, 2022, 12 (08) : 4973 - 4987