Is removal and destruction of perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances from wastewater effluent affordable?

被引:2
作者
Ling, Alison L. [1 ]
Vermace, Rebecca R. [1 ]
McCabe, Andrew J. [1 ]
Wolohan, Kathryn M. [1 ]
Kyser, Scott J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Barr Engn Co, 4300 MarketPointe Dr,Suite 200, Minneapolis, MN 55435 USA
[2] Minnesota Pollut Control Agcy, St Paul, MN USA
关键词
cost burden; perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS); PFAS destruction; PFAS treatment; wastewater affordability; water resource recovery facility (WRRF); MEMBRANE BIOREACTORS; MUNICIPAL; TRANSPORT; COST; FATE;
D O I
10.1002/wer.10975
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Several jurisdictions are currently evaluating regulatory standards for perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in municipal water resource recovery facility (WRRF) effluent. Effective and responsible implementation of PFAS effluent limits should consider the costs and capabilities of currently available technologies, because the costs of meeting WRRF PFAS limits could disproportionally fall to ratepayers. Cost curves were developed for currently available PFAS separation and destruction options, assuming effluent treatment targets near current analytical detection limits. Removing and destroying PFAS from municipal WRRF effluent is estimated to increase costs per household by a factor of between 2 and 210, using Minnesota-specific data as an example. Estimated costs per household would increase more for residents of smaller communities, averaging 33% of median household income (MHHI) in communities smaller than 1000 people. This exceeds the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)-developed affordability index of 2% of MHHI by a factor of 16. Estimated costs per household to remove and destroy PFAS varied among locations, primarily based on WRRF and community size, median income, rural versus urban, and type of wastewater treatment processes currently used.Practitioner Points Required tertiary treatment before WRRF effluent PFAS separation, using currently available technologies, is a significant portion (similar to 40-80%) of estimated costs. Adding PFAS separation, destruction, and pre-treatment would make Minnesota wastewater rates unaffordable (defined by EPA affordability guidance) without external funding. The estimated cost per household is higher for smaller communities and would require substantial external funding to maintain rate affordability. Design and operating uncertainties remain for full-scale WRRF retrofits to consistently remove and destroy effluent PFAS with limited full-scale applications.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A review of contamination of surface-, ground-, and drinking water in Sweden by perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs)
    Banzhaf, Stefan
    Filipovic, Marko
    Lewis, Jeffrey
    Sparrenbom, Charlotte J.
    Barthel, Roland
    AMBIO, 2017, 46 (03) : 335 - 346
  • [32] Concentrations and patterns of perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances in a river and three drinking water treatment plants near and far from a major production source
    Boiteux, Virginie
    Dauchy, Xavier
    Bach, Cristina
    Colin, Adeline
    Hemard, Jessica
    Sagres, Veronique
    Rosin, Christophe
    Munoz, Jean-Francois
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 583 : 393 - 400
  • [33] Removal of antibiotics and nutrients by Vetiver grass (Chrysopogon zizanioides) from secondary wastewater effluent
    Panja, Saumik
    Sarkar, Dibyendu
    Datta, Rupali
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHYTOREMEDIATION, 2020, 22 (07) : 764 - 773
  • [34] Seasonal variation and inhalation health risk of atmospheric polyfluoroalkyl and perfluoroalkyl substances in a metropolitan city centre of southwest China
    Si, Hongtao
    Xie, Donghang
    Wang, Fengwen
    Hao, Mengbing
    Liu, Jiaxin
    Guo, Hai
    Rose, Neil L.
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2025, 342
  • [35] Occurrence and fate of perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in an urban aquifer located at the Bes`os River Delta (Spain)
    Saez, Carmen
    Bautista, Arianna
    Nikolenko, Olha
    Scheiber, Laura
    Llorca, Marta
    Jurado, Anna
    Farre, Marinella
    Pujades-Garnes, Estanislao
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2024, 358
  • [36] Degradation of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in wastewater effluents by photocatalysis for water reuse
    Xia, Chunjie
    Lim, Xian
    Yang, Haoran
    Goodson, Boyd M.
    Liu, Jia
    JOURNAL OF WATER PROCESS ENGINEERING, 2022, 46
  • [37] Evaluation of the efficiency of selected wastewater treatment processes in removing selected perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs)
    Kibambe, M. G.
    Momba, M. N. B.
    Daso, A. P.
    Coetzee, M. A. A.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2020, 255
  • [38] The significance of fluorinated compound chain length, treatment technology, and influent composition on per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances removal in worldwide wastewater treatment plants
    Ilieva, Zanina
    Hamza, Rania A.
    Suehring, Roxana
    INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 20 (01) : 59 - 69
  • [39] Partitioning and removal of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in full-scale surface flow treatment wetlands with different upstream wastewater treatment
    Sarti, Chiara
    Souleymane, Ayisha Affo
    Dotro, Gabriela
    Cincinelli, Alessandra
    Lyu, Tao
    JOURNAL OF WATER PROCESS ENGINEERING, 2025, 71
  • [40] Removal of hazardous substances in municipal wastewater treatment plants
    Korgmaa, Vallo
    Laht, Mailis
    Rebane, Riin
    Lember, Erki
    Pachel, Karin
    Kriipsalu, Mait
    Tenno, Taavo
    Iital, Arvo
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 81 (09) : 2011 - 2022