Is removal and destruction of perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances from wastewater effluent affordable?

被引:2
作者
Ling, Alison L. [1 ]
Vermace, Rebecca R. [1 ]
McCabe, Andrew J. [1 ]
Wolohan, Kathryn M. [1 ]
Kyser, Scott J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Barr Engn Co, 4300 MarketPointe Dr,Suite 200, Minneapolis, MN 55435 USA
[2] Minnesota Pollut Control Agcy, St Paul, MN USA
关键词
cost burden; perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS); PFAS destruction; PFAS treatment; wastewater affordability; water resource recovery facility (WRRF); MEMBRANE BIOREACTORS; MUNICIPAL; TRANSPORT; COST; FATE;
D O I
10.1002/wer.10975
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Several jurisdictions are currently evaluating regulatory standards for perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in municipal water resource recovery facility (WRRF) effluent. Effective and responsible implementation of PFAS effluent limits should consider the costs and capabilities of currently available technologies, because the costs of meeting WRRF PFAS limits could disproportionally fall to ratepayers. Cost curves were developed for currently available PFAS separation and destruction options, assuming effluent treatment targets near current analytical detection limits. Removing and destroying PFAS from municipal WRRF effluent is estimated to increase costs per household by a factor of between 2 and 210, using Minnesota-specific data as an example. Estimated costs per household would increase more for residents of smaller communities, averaging 33% of median household income (MHHI) in communities smaller than 1000 people. This exceeds the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)-developed affordability index of 2% of MHHI by a factor of 16. Estimated costs per household to remove and destroy PFAS varied among locations, primarily based on WRRF and community size, median income, rural versus urban, and type of wastewater treatment processes currently used.Practitioner Points Required tertiary treatment before WRRF effluent PFAS separation, using currently available technologies, is a significant portion (similar to 40-80%) of estimated costs. Adding PFAS separation, destruction, and pre-treatment would make Minnesota wastewater rates unaffordable (defined by EPA affordability guidance) without external funding. The estimated cost per household is higher for smaller communities and would require substantial external funding to maintain rate affordability. Design and operating uncertainties remain for full-scale WRRF retrofits to consistently remove and destroy effluent PFAS with limited full-scale applications.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) - Fibrous substrates
    Newland, Ashley
    Khyum, Mirza Mohammad Omar
    Halamek, Jan
    Ramkumar, Seshadri
    TAPPI JOURNAL, 2023, 22 (09): : 559 - 572
  • [2] Interaction of microplastics with perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances in water: A review of the fate, mechanisms and toxicity
    Yu, Fan
    Wu, Jiaping
    Wang, Huangyingzi
    Bao, Yinzhou
    Xing, Haoyu
    Ye, Wenpei
    Li, Xuhua
    Huang, Manhong
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 948
  • [3] Perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) in mineral water and tap water
    Gellrich, Vanessa
    Brunn, Hubertus
    Stahl, Thorsten
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND HEALTH PART A-TOXIC/HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES & ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2013, 48 (02): : 129 - 135
  • [4] Previously unidentified sources of perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances from building materials and industrial fabrics
    Janousek, Raphael M.
    Lebertz, Stephan
    Knepper, Thomas P.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE-PROCESSES & IMPACTS, 2019, 21 (11) : 1936 - 1945
  • [5] Seasonal and annual variations in removal efficiency of perfluoroalkyl substances by different wastewater treatment processes
    Chen, Shuqin
    Zhou, Yunqiao
    Meng, Jing
    Wang, Tieyu
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2018, 242 : 2059 - 2067
  • [6] Perfluoroalkyl and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances in Groundwater Used as a Source of Drinking Water in the Eastern United States
    McMahon, Peter B.
    Tokranov, Andrea K.
    Bexfield, Laura M.
    Lindsey, Bruce D.
    Johnson, Tyler D.
    Lombard, Melissa A.
    Watson, Elise
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 56 (04) : 2279 - 2288
  • [7] Perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) in consumer products in Norway - A pilot study
    Herzke, Dorte
    Olsson, Elisabeth
    Posner, Stefan
    CHEMOSPHERE, 2012, 88 (08) : 980 - 987
  • [8] Application of a Microporous Polyethylene Tube Passive Sampler for Monitoring Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances in Wastewater Influent and Effluent
    Mackie, Rachel
    Hawker, Darryl W.
    Ghorbani Gorji, Sara
    Booij, Kees
    Qu, Xuan
    Bowles, Karl
    Shea, Stefanie
    Higgins, Christopher P.
    Kaserzon, Sarit
    ACS ES&T WATER, 2024, 4 (05): : 2281 - 2291
  • [9] Updated national emission of perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) from wastewater treatment plants in South Korea
    Kwon, Hye-Ok
    Kim, Hee-Young
    Park, Yu-Mi
    Seok, Kwang-Seol
    Oh, Jeong-Eun
    Choi, Sung-Deuk
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2017, 220 : 298 - 306
  • [10] Use of glioma to assess the distribution patterns of perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances in human brain
    Xie, Meng-Yi
    Lin, Zhi-Ying
    Liu, Liang-Ying
    Wu, Chen-Chou
    Liu, Ya-Wei
    Huang, Guang-Long
    Zeng, Eddy Y.
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2022, 204