Comparing neoadjuvant therapy followed by local excision to total mesorectal excision in the treatment of early stage rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials

被引:2
|
作者
Lynch, Paul [1 ]
Ryan, Odhran K. [1 ]
Donnelly, Mark [1 ]
Ryan, Eanna J. [1 ]
Davey, Matthew G. [1 ]
Reynolds, Ian S. [1 ]
Creavin, Ben [1 ]
Hanly, Ann [1 ]
Kennelly, Rory [1 ]
Martin, Sean T. [1 ]
Winter, Des C. [1 ]
机构
[1] St Vincents Univ Hosp, Dept Colorectal Surg, Elm Pk, Dublin, Ireland
关键词
Local excision; Neoadjuvant therapy; Organ preserving; Overall survival; Total mesorectal excision; TRANSANAL ENDOSCOPIC MICROSURGERY; PHASE-III TRIAL; ORGAN PRESERVATION; OPEN-LABEL; PREOPERATIVE CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; CHEMORADIATION THERAPY; INTERNATIONAL WATCH; COMPLETE RESPONSE; RADICAL SURGERY; TERM OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1007/s00384-023-04558-8
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
IntroductionTotal mesorectal excision (TME) is the standard-of-care in early, clinical stage (cT2-3 N0 M0) rectal cancer. Local excision (LE) may be an alternative after adequate response to neoadjuvant therapy (NAT), with either long-course chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) or short-course radiotherapy (SCRT), as a means of preserving the rectum and potentially obviating the morbidity of TME.MethodsA systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines for studies that randomly assigned patients with cT2-3 N0 M0 rectal cancer to either NAT + LE or TME that reported radiologic, oncologic, surgical, and morbidity outcomes.ResultsA total of 4 RCTs comprise 462 patients (232 patients receiving NAT + LE; nCRT n = 205; SCRT n = 27) and 230 undergoing TME, respectively. NAT compliance was 98.86%. The rate of early completion TME in the NAT + LE group was 22.3%, while the proportion of patients achieving durable organ preservation was 75.4% at mean follow-up of 5.6 years. There was no difference in disease-free survival (DFS) (HR [hazard ratio] 1.19; 95% CI 0.95, 1.49; p = 0.13) or overall survival (OS) (HR 0.94; 95% CI 0.72, 1.23; p = 0.63]) according to the assigned treatment arm. The local recurrence rate (LRR) (HR 1.22; 95% CI 0.5-3.02; p = 0.66) and distant metastases (HR 0.92; 95% CI 0.45, 1.90; p = 0.82) were also comparable between the groups. There was a significant reduction in major (OR 0.45; 95% CI 0.21, 0.95; p = 0.04) and minor morbidity (OR 0.45; 95% CI 0.24, 0.85; p = 0.01) for patients undergoing NAT + LE. Overall stoma formation was decreased in the NAT + LE group (OR 0.03; 95% CI 0.0, 0.23; p <= 0.00001).ConclusionNAT + LE reduces adverse effects of TME, without any compromise in oncological outcomes, and the potential for an organ preserving strategy should be discussed with patients with T2-3N0 rectal cancers prior to treatment.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The impact of transanal local excision of early rectal cancer on completion rectal resection without neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a systematic review
    Zinicola, R.
    Nascimbeni, R.
    Cirocchi, R.
    Gagliardi, G.
    Cracco, N.
    Giuffrida, M.
    Pedrazzi, G.
    Binda, G. A.
    TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2021, 25 (09) : 997 - 1010
  • [42] Endoscopic submucosal dissection versus local excision for early rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    S. Wang
    S. Gao
    W. Yang
    S. Guo
    Y. Li
    Techniques in Coloproctology, 2016, 20 : 1 - 9
  • [43] Endoscopic submucosal dissection versus local excision for early rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, S.
    Gao, S.
    Yang, W.
    Guo, S.
    Li, Y.
    TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2016, 20 (01) : 1 - 9
  • [44] Total laparoscopic mesorectal excision versus robot-assisted in the treatment of rectal cancer: a meta-analysis
    Gonzalez Fernandez, Ana Maria
    Mascarenas Gonzalez, Juan Francisco
    CIRUGIA ESPANOLA, 2012, 90 (06): : 348 - 354
  • [45] Local excision in rectal cancer patients with major or complete clinical response after neoadjuvant therapy: a case-matched study
    Bushati, M.
    Pucciarelli, S.
    Gennaro, N.
    Maretto, I
    Toppan, P.
    Perin, A.
    Urso, E. D. L.
    Bagatella, A.
    Spolverato, G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2019, 34 (12) : 2129 - 2136
  • [46] Does transanal local resection increase morbidity for subsequent total mesorectal excision for early rectal cancer?
    Coton, C.
    Lefevre, J. H.
    Debove, C.
    Creavin, B.
    Chafai, N.
    Tiret, E.
    Parc, Y.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2019, 21 (01) : 15 - 22
  • [47] Transanal endoscopic microsurgery is an oncologically safe alternative to total mesorectal excision for stage I rectal cancer: results of a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Chiniah, Manu
    Ganganah, Oormila
    Cheng, Yong
    Sah, Shambhu Kumar
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2016, 31 (08) : 1501 - 1504
  • [48] Transanal endoscopic microsurgery is an oncologically safe alternative to total mesorectal excision for stage I rectal cancer: results of a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Manu Chiniah
    Oormila Ganganah
    Yong Cheng
    Shambhu Kumar Sah
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2016, 31 : 1501 - 1504
  • [49] Survival analysis of local excision vs total mesorectal excision for middle and low rectal cancer in pT1/pT2 stage and intermediate pathological risk
    Lai, I-Li
    You, Jeng-Fu
    Chern, Yih-Jong
    Tsai, Wen-Sy
    Chiang, Jy-Ming
    Hsieh, Pao-Shiu
    Hung, Hsin-Yuan
    Yeh, Chien-Yuh
    Chiang, Sum-Fu
    Lai, Cheng-Chou
    Tang, Rei-Ping
    Chen, Jinn-Shiun
    Hsu, Yu-Jen
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 17 (01)
  • [50] Comparison of Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery and Total Mesorectal Excision in the Treatment of T1 Rectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
    Lu, Jun-Yang
    Lin, Guo-Le
    Qiu, Hui-Zhong
    Xiao, Yi
    Wu, Bin
    Zhou, Jiao-Lin
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (10):