GlideScope versus C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscope for double-lumen tube intubation in patients with anticipated difficult airways: A multi-center, prospective, randomized, controlled trial

被引:1
作者
Huang, Ping [1 ]
Qiu, Yuwei [2 ]
Xu, Ting [3 ]
Sun, Xiaoqiong [1 ]
Lu, Zhixing [1 ]
Zhang, Yunyun [2 ]
Yu, Jiangli [3 ]
Wu, Jingxiang [2 ]
Su, Diansan [1 ]
Huang, Zhenling [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Renji Hosp, Dept Anaesthesiol, Sch Med, 160 Pujian Rd, Shanghai 200127, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Shanghai Chest Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Sch Med, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Elect Sci & Technol China, Sichuan Acad Med Sci, Dept Anesthesiol, Sichuan Prov Peoples Hosp, Chengdu, Peoples R China
关键词
Videolaryngoscope; GlideScope; C-MAC D-blade; Double-lumen tube intubation; Difficult airways; MACINTOSH LARYNGOSCOPE; TRACHEAL INTUBATION; THORACIC-SURGERY; INSERTION; PREDICTORS; ANESTHESIA; ROUTINE; AIRTRAQ; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclinane.2023.111274
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Study objective: Videolaryngoscopes are widely used to visualize difficult airways. Our aim was to compare the GlideScope and C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscopes for double-lumen tube (DLT) intubation in patients with difficult airways.Design: A multi-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial. Setting: Three comprehensive tertiary, high-volume hospitals from 5 December 2020 to 4 November 2021.Patients: We included 348 adult patients with anticipated difficult airways who underwent elective thoracic surgery.Interventions: Patients were randomized into two groups: GlideScope and C-MAC D-blade. Following anesthesia induction, DLT intubation was performed using different videolaryngoscopes. Measurements: The primary outcome was the first-pass success rate of DLT intubation. All other results were recorded as secondary outcomes.Main results: No significant differences were observed in the first-pass success rate of DLT intubation between the GlideScope and C-MAC D-blade (86.21% and 89.66%, respectively; P = 0.323). However, compared with the GlideScope, the C-MAC D-blade provided a lower Cormack-Lehane grade (P < 0.001), lower rates of external laryngeal pressure (48 vs. 15, P < 0.001), and postprocedure sore throat (26 vs. 8, P < 0.001). The numerical rating score for difficulty of videolaryngoscope insertion into the oral cavity, delivery to the glottis, and intubation into the main bronchus were significantly lower when using the C-MAC D-blade (P < 0.001). Moreover, the duration of DLT intubation was shorter in the C-MAC D-blade group (81 s [70-97 s] vs. 95 s [78-115 s], P < 0.001). In each group, two patients underwent fiberoptic intubation after three attempts with a video-laryngoscope failed.Conclusions: In patients with difficult airways, the GlideScope and C-MAC D-blade provided a similar success rate on the first DLT intubation attempt; however, the C-MAC D-blade offers a better glottic view, easier and faster intubation, and lower incidence of sore throat.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [11] Using a Glidescope for intubation witb a double lumen endotracheal tube
    Hernandez, AA
    Wong, DH
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 2005, 52 (06): : 658 - 659
  • [12] Comparison of the GlideScope® videolaryngoscope and the Macintosh laryngoscope for double-lumen tube intubation
    Hsu, H. -T.
    Chou, S. -H.
    Wu, P. -J.
    Tseng, K. -Y.
    Kuo, Y. -W.
    Chou, C. -Y.
    Cheng, K. -I.
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA, 2012, 67 (04) : 411 - 415
  • [13] GlideScope® versus C-MAC®(D) videolaryngoscope versus Macintosh laryngoscope for double lumen endotracheal intubation in patients with predicted normal airways: a randomized, controlled, prospective trial
    Huang, Ping
    Zhou, Renlong
    Lu, Zhixing
    Hang, Yannan
    Wang, Shanjuan
    Huang, Zhenling
    [J]. BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [14] Comparison of direct and video-assisted views of the larynx during routine intubation
    Kaplan, Marshal B.
    Hagberg, Carin A.
    Ward, Denham S.
    Brambrink, Ansgar
    Chhibber, Ashwani K.
    Heidegger, Thomas
    Lozada, Leonardo
    Ovassapian, Andranik
    Parsons, David
    Ramsay, James
    Wilhelm, Wolfram
    Zwissler, Bernhard
    Gerig, Haus J.
    Hofstetter, Christian
    Karan, Suzanne
    Kreisler, Nevin
    Pousman, Robert M.
    Thierbach, Andreas
    Wrobel, Marc
    Berci, George
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2006, 18 (05) : 357 - 362
  • [15] Incidence and predictors of difficult and impossible mask ventilation
    Kheterpal, Sachin
    Han, Richard
    Tremper, Kevin K.
    Shanks, Amy
    Tait, Alan R.
    O'Reilly, Michael
    Ludwig, Thomas A.
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2006, 105 (05) : 885 - 891
  • [16] Different classes of videoscopes and direct laryngoscopes for double-lumen tube intubation in thoracic surgery: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Kim, Young Sung
    Song, Jihyun
    Lim, Byung Gun
    Lee, Il Ok
    Won, Young Ju
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (08):
  • [17] Evaluation of six videolaryngoscopes in 720 patients with a simulated difficult airway: a multicentre randomized controlled trial
    Kleine-Brueggeney, M.
    Greif, R.
    Schoettker, P.
    Savoldelli, G. L.
    Nabecker, S.
    Theiler, L. G.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2016, 116 (05) : 670 - 679
  • [18] Airway management in anesthesia for thoracic surgery: a "real life" observational study
    Langiano, Nicola
    Fiorelli, Silvia
    Deana, Cristian
    Baroselli, Antonio
    Bignami, Elena Giovanna
    Matellon, Carola
    Pompei, Livia
    Tornaghi, Anna
    Piccioni, Federico
    Orsetti, Remo
    Coccia, Cecilia
    Sacchi, Noemi
    DAndrea, Rocco
    Brazzi, Luca
    Franco, Carlo
    Accardo, Rosanna
    Di Fuccia, Antonio
    Baldinelli, Francesco
    De Negri, Pasquale
    Gratarola, Angelo
    Angeletti, Chiara
    Pugliese, Francesco
    Micozzi, Marco Valerio
    Massullo, Domenico
    Della Rocca, Giorgio
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2019, 11 (08) : 3257 - +
  • [19] The Complexities of Tracheal Intubation With Direct Laryngoscopy and Alternative Intubation Devices
    Levitan, Richard M.
    Heitz, James W.
    Sweeney, Michael
    Cooper, Richard M.
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2011, 57 (03) : 240 - 247
  • [20] Mathew Amit, 2021, J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol, V37, P266, DOI 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_79_20