GlideScope versus C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscope for double-lumen tube intubation in patients with anticipated difficult airways: A multi-center, prospective, randomized, controlled trial

被引:1
作者
Huang, Ping [1 ]
Qiu, Yuwei [2 ]
Xu, Ting [3 ]
Sun, Xiaoqiong [1 ]
Lu, Zhixing [1 ]
Zhang, Yunyun [2 ]
Yu, Jiangli [3 ]
Wu, Jingxiang [2 ]
Su, Diansan [1 ]
Huang, Zhenling [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Renji Hosp, Dept Anaesthesiol, Sch Med, 160 Pujian Rd, Shanghai 200127, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Shanghai Chest Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Sch Med, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Elect Sci & Technol China, Sichuan Acad Med Sci, Dept Anesthesiol, Sichuan Prov Peoples Hosp, Chengdu, Peoples R China
关键词
Videolaryngoscope; GlideScope; C-MAC D-blade; Double-lumen tube intubation; Difficult airways; MACINTOSH LARYNGOSCOPE; TRACHEAL INTUBATION; THORACIC-SURGERY; INSERTION; PREDICTORS; ANESTHESIA; ROUTINE; AIRTRAQ; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclinane.2023.111274
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Study objective: Videolaryngoscopes are widely used to visualize difficult airways. Our aim was to compare the GlideScope and C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscopes for double-lumen tube (DLT) intubation in patients with difficult airways.Design: A multi-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial. Setting: Three comprehensive tertiary, high-volume hospitals from 5 December 2020 to 4 November 2021.Patients: We included 348 adult patients with anticipated difficult airways who underwent elective thoracic surgery.Interventions: Patients were randomized into two groups: GlideScope and C-MAC D-blade. Following anesthesia induction, DLT intubation was performed using different videolaryngoscopes. Measurements: The primary outcome was the first-pass success rate of DLT intubation. All other results were recorded as secondary outcomes.Main results: No significant differences were observed in the first-pass success rate of DLT intubation between the GlideScope and C-MAC D-blade (86.21% and 89.66%, respectively; P = 0.323). However, compared with the GlideScope, the C-MAC D-blade provided a lower Cormack-Lehane grade (P < 0.001), lower rates of external laryngeal pressure (48 vs. 15, P < 0.001), and postprocedure sore throat (26 vs. 8, P < 0.001). The numerical rating score for difficulty of videolaryngoscope insertion into the oral cavity, delivery to the glottis, and intubation into the main bronchus were significantly lower when using the C-MAC D-blade (P < 0.001). Moreover, the duration of DLT intubation was shorter in the C-MAC D-blade group (81 s [70-97 s] vs. 95 s [78-115 s], P < 0.001). In each group, two patients underwent fiberoptic intubation after three attempts with a video-laryngoscope failed.Conclusions: In patients with difficult airways, the GlideScope and C-MAC D-blade provided a similar success rate on the first DLT intubation attempt; however, the C-MAC D-blade offers a better glottic view, easier and faster intubation, and lower incidence of sore throat.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] Preoperative assessment for difficult intubation in general and ENT surgery:: predictive value of a clinical multivariate risk index
    Arné, J
    Descoins, P
    Fusciardi, J
    Ingrand, P
    Ferrier, B
    Boudigues, D
    Ariès, J
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1998, 80 (02) : 140 - 146
  • [2] Predictors of difficult videolaryngoscopy with GlideScope® or C-MAC® with D-blade: secondary analysis from a large comparative videolaryngoscopy trial
    Aziz, M. F.
    Bayman, E. O.
    Van Tienderen, M. M.
    Todd, M. M.
    Brambrink, A. M.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2016, 117 (01) : 118 - 123
  • [3] Glidescope versus Airtraq DL for double-lumen tracheal tube insertion in patients with a predicted or known difficult airway A randomised study
    Belze, Olivier
    Lepage, Evan
    Bazin, Yvan
    Kerourin, Pierre
    Fusciardi, Jacques
    Remerand, Francis
    Espitalier, Fabien
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2017, 34 (07) : 456 - 463
  • [4] First Clinical Evaluation of the C-MAC D-Blade Videolaryngoscope During Routine and Difficult Intubation
    Cavus, Erol
    Neumann, Tobias
    Doerges, Volker
    Moeller, Thora
    Scharf, Edwin
    Wagner, Klaus
    Bein, Berthold
    Serocki, Goetz
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2011, 112 (02) : 382 - 385
  • [5] Dental Strain on Maxillary Incisors During Tracheal Intubation With Double-Lumen Tubes and Different Laryngoscopy Techniques-A Blinded Mannequin Study
    Defosse, Jerome
    Kleinschmidt, Joris
    Schmutz, Axel
    Loop, Torsten
    Staat, Manfred
    Gatzweiler, Karl-Heinz
    Wappler, Frank
    Schieren, Mark
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2022, 36 (08) : 3021 - 3027
  • [6] Survey of Thoracic Anesthetic Practice in Italy
    Della Rocca, Giorgio
    Langiano, Nicola
    Baroselli, Antonio
    Granzotti, Saskia
    Pravisani, Chiara
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2013, 27 (06) : 1321 - 1329
  • [7] Videolaryngoscopes for placement of double lumen tubes: Is it time to say goodbye to direct view?
    El-Tahan, M. R.
    [J]. SAUDI JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2016, 10 (02) : 218 - 227
  • [8] Difficult and failed intubation in the first 4000 incidents reported on webAIRS
    Endlich, Yasmin
    Lee, Julie
    Culwick, Martin D.
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 2020, 48 (06) : 477 - 487
  • [9] Harlow M, 2021, CAN J ANESTH, V68, P1779, DOI 10.1007/s12630-021-02099-8
  • [10] A randomized controlled trial comparing C Mac D Blade and Macintosh laryngoscope for nasotracheal intubation in patients undergoing surgeries for head and neck cancer
    Hazarika, Hrishikesh
    Saxena, Anudeep
    Meshram, Pradeep
    Bhargava, Ajay Kumar
    [J]. SAUDI JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2018, 12 (01) : 35 - 41