Surface roughness of as-printed polymers: a comprehensive review

被引:72
作者
Golhin, Ali Payami [1 ]
Tonello, Riccardo [2 ]
Frisvad, Jeppe Revall [2 ]
Grammatikos, Sotirios [1 ]
Strandlie, Are [1 ]
机构
[1] NTNU Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Mfg & Civil Engn, ASEMlab Lab Adv & Sustainable Engn Mat, Gjovik, Norway
[2] DTU Tech Univ Denmark, Dept Appl Math & Comp Sci, Lyngby, Denmark
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Additive manufacturing; 3D printing parameters; Polymer; Surface roughness; Surface quality; MULTI JET FUSION; MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES; THERMOMECHANICAL PROPERTIES; POLYCAPROLACTONE SCAFFOLDS; DIMENSIONAL ACCURACY; PROCESS PARAMETERS; ALUMINUM-ALLOY; FDM PROCESS; LASER; PARTS;
D O I
10.1007/s00170-023-11566-z
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Surface roughness is gaining increasing recognition in the processing design methods of additive manufacturing (AM) due to its role in many critical applications. This impact extends not only to various AM product manufacturing but also to indirect applications, such as molding and casting. This review article discusses the role of processing on the surface roughness of AM-printed polymers with limited post-processing by summarizing recent advances. This review offers a benchmark for surface quality improvement of AM processes, considering the surface roughness of polymeric parts. For this purpose, it lists and analyzes the key processes and various printing parameters used to monitor and adjust surface roughness under given constraints. Four AM techniques for manufacturing polymeric parts are compared: fused filament fabrication (FFF), selective laser sintering (SLS), vat photopolymerization (VPP), and material jetting (MJT). A review and discussion of recent studies are presented, along with the most critical process parameters that affect surface roughness for the selected AM techniques. To assist in selecting the most appropriate method of 3D printing, comparable research summaries are presented. The outcome is a detailed survey of current techniques, process parameters, roughness ranges, and their applicability in achieving surface quality improvement in as-printed polymers.
引用
收藏
页码:987 / 1043
页数:57
相关论文
共 264 条
[1]   Effect of strut length and orientation on elastic mechanical response of modified body-centered cubic lattice structures [J].
Abdulhadi, Hasanain S. ;
Mian, Ahsan .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART L-JOURNAL OF MATERIALS-DESIGN AND APPLICATIONS, 2019, 233 (11) :2219-2233
[2]   Structural quality of parts processed by fused deposition [J].
Agarwala, Mukesh K. ;
Jamalabad, Vikram R. ;
Langrana, Noshir A. ;
Safari, Ahmad ;
Whalen, Philip J. ;
Danforth, Stephen C. .
RAPID PROTOTYPING JOURNAL, 1996, 2 (04) :4-19
[3]  
Akilesh M, 2018, 3D PRINT ADDIT MANUF, P141, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-981-13-0305-0_13
[4]  
Alex Xu BL, 2021, POLYM ADDITIVE MANUF
[5]   A Test Part for Evaluating the Accuracy and Resolution of a Polymer Powder Bed Fusion Process [J].
Allison, Jared ;
Sharpe, Conner ;
Seepersad, Carolyn Conner .
JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN, 2017, 139 (10)
[6]   3D printing of glass fiber reinforced acrylonitrile butadiene styrene and investigation of tensile, flexural, warpage and roughness properties [J].
Amiri, Aria ;
Zolfaghari, Abbas ;
Shakeri, Mohsen .
POLYMER COMPOSITES, 2022, 43 (09) :6287-6299
[7]  
Andrzejewska E, 1998, J POLYM SCI POL CHEM, V36, P665, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0518(199803)36:4<665::AID-POLA15>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-K
[9]   Critical parameters influencing the quality of prototypes in fused deposition modelling [J].
Anitha, R ;
Arunachalam, S ;
Radhakrishnan, P .
JOURNAL OF MATERIALS PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2001, 118 (1-3) :385-388
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2021, 52900 ISOASTM, P1, DOI DOI 10.1520/F3177-21