What kind of enterprises and residents bear more responsibilities in carbon trading? A step-by-step analysis based on the CGE model

被引:44
作者
Jia, Zhijie [1 ]
机构
[1] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Econ & Finance, Xian 710049, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
关键词
Emission trading scheme; Price impact; Impact mechanism; Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) model; QUANTIFICATION; EMISSION; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106950
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper provides a new analytical framework interpreting the model results from a computable general equilibrium model. The study takes China's Emission Trading Scheme (ETS) as an example, applying the China Energy-Environment-Economy Analysis model to study the impact mechanism of the ETS. The study constructs three types of ETS coverage, analyzes the price fluctuation, considers the impact on macro indicators, and finally calculates the impact on residents, factor flow, enterprises, and households. The results show that the ETS only covering electricity may lead to the highest rise of consumer price index and most significant reduction of actual purchasing power; rural households may suffer more from ETS negative impact because of the consumption structure; ETS may create new job opportunities in the ETS-covered sectors, especially in energy-intensive in-dustries for low carbon careers. However, the outputs of these industries still decrease. It should be noted that carbon trading may widen the urban-rural gap from both the source side and consumer side.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Socioeconomic impacts of household participation in emission trading scheme: A Computable General Equilibrium-based case study [J].
An, Kangxin ;
Zhang, Shihui ;
Huang, Hai ;
Liu, Yuan ;
Cai, Wenjia ;
Wang, Can .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2021, 288
[2]   Are residents willing to pay for garbage recycling: Evidence from a survey in Chinese first-tier cities [J].
Bai, Rui ;
Lin, Boqiang .
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2022, 95
[3]   Government subsidies and firm-level renewable energy investment: New evidence from partially linear functional-coefficient models [J].
Bai, Rui ;
Lin, Boqiang ;
Liu, Xiying .
ENERGY POLICY, 2021, 159
[4]   Quantification of an efficiency-sovereignty trade-off in climate policy [J].
Bauer, Nico ;
Bertram, Christoph ;
Schultes, Anselm ;
Klein, David ;
Luderer, Gunnar ;
Kriegler, Elmar ;
Popp, Alexander ;
Edenhofer, Ottmar .
NATURE, 2020, 588 (7837) :261-+
[5]   Trade in Carbon and Carbon Tariffs [J].
Bohringer, Christoph ;
Schneider, Jan ;
Asane-Otoo, Emmanuel .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2021, 78 (04) :669-708
[6]   Firm competitiveness and the European Union emissions trading scheme [J].
Chan, Hei Sing ;
Li, Shanjun ;
Zhang, Fan .
ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 63 :1056-1064
[7]   Air quality and health co-benefits of China's national emission trading system [J].
Chang, Shiyan ;
Yang, Xi ;
Zheng, Haotian ;
Wang, Shuxiao ;
Zhang, Xiliang .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2020, 261
[8]   The distribution and regional determinants of nationally financed emissions-reduction projects in China [J].
Cong, Ren ;
Lo, Alex Y. ;
Yu, Wei .
ENERGY POLICY, 2021, 152
[9]   The validity of carbon emission trading policies: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China [J].
Dong Zhi-Qing ;
Wang Hui ;
Wang Shi-Xiang ;
Wang Lin-Hui .
ADVANCES IN CLIMATE CHANGE RESEARCH, 2020, 11 (02) :102-109
[10]   Effects of emission trading system on green total factor productivity in China: Empirical evidence from a quasi-natural experiment [J].
Feng, Yanchao ;
Wang, Xiaohong ;
Liang, Zhou ;
Hu, Shilei ;
Xie, Yu ;
Wu, Guoyong .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 294