The EU Introduction of Learning Outcomes: Norms and Standards versus Transparency and Comparability of Qualifications?

被引:1
作者
Ure, Odd Bjorn [1 ]
机构
[1] Consultur Studies & Anal, Oslo, Norway
关键词
Policy making of the European Union; multi-level policy reforms; discourse theories; discursive institutionalism; qualification frameworks; learning outcomes; HIGHER-EDUCATION; DISCOURSE; EUROPE; MODEL;
D O I
10.1080/01900692.2022.2068578
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
The introduction of Learning Outcomes aims to reform education and training at a national and multi-country level. They thereby acquire a central role in policy reforms that could affect all educational and administrative levels. Learning Outcomes are introduced in order to displace input to output categories. This shift is meant to make qualifications more transparent, notably by means of the European Qualification Framework upheld by Learning Outcomes. The purpose of this article is to contribute to a debate about which theoretical perspectives that are apt to capture central characteristics of the education policy of the European Union. The empirical material sustaining the article suggests that discourse theories serve this purpose in so far as they are supplemented by reform theories and institutional perspectives on education and training. One conclusion is that the theoretical strand 'discursive institutionalism' is useful for combining these theories.
引用
收藏
页码:1033 / 1043
页数:11
相关论文
共 54 条
  • [1] Varieties of discourse: On the study of organizations through discourse analysis
    Alvesson, M
    Karreman, D
    [J]. HUMAN RELATIONS, 2000, 53 (09) : 1125 - 1149
  • [2] [Anonymous], WEB LINKS MINUTES EU
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2011, USING LEARNING OUTCO
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2018, CEDEFOP
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2009, AM POLITICAL SCI ASS
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2012, Rethinking Education: Investing in skills for better socioeconomic outcomes
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2013, UNPUB
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2010, 6 CED
  • [9] What can 'benchmarking' offer the open method of co-ordination?
    Arrowsmith, J
    Sisson, K
    Marginson, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN PUBLIC POLICY, 2004, 11 (02) : 311 - 328
  • [10] A MODEL OF MUDDLING THROUGH
    BENDOR, J
    [J]. AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 1995, 89 (04) : 819 - 840