Mobility devices for children with physical disabilities: use, satisfaction and impact on participation

被引:11
作者
Gudjonsdottir, Bjorg [1 ]
Gudmundsdottir, Svandis Bjork [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Iceland, Sch Hlth Sci, Dept Phys Therapy, Stapi & Hringbraut 101, Reykjavik, Iceland
关键词
Children with disabilities; assistive devices; use; impact on activities and participation; users' satisfaction; TECHNOLOGY SERVICE DELIVERY; ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY; CEREBRAL-PALSY; RELIABILITY; EXPERIENCES; VALIDITY; QUALITY; WHEELCHAIR; BARRIERS; ADULTS;
D O I
10.1080/17483107.2021.1913519
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Introduction Children with physical disabilities commonly use mobility devices. There is a lack of studies on the use and impact of mobility devices on activities and participation. Research is needed on satisfaction with the service delivery process of mobility devices. Purpose To examine the use and impact of mobility devices among children with physical disabilities and the satisfaction with the properties of their mobility devices and related services. Materials and methods A web-based survey was sent to parents of 6 - 18 years old children with physical disabilities who used mobility devices in Iceland. The use and effectiveness of mobility devices were assessed with a questionnaire designed for this study. The satisfaction was measured with Quebec user evaluation of satisfaction with assistive technology (QUEST) 2.0. Results The survey was sent to 55 families and 36 replied. Most of the children used mobility devices in social activities. The number of participants who reported positive effects of devices on activities and participation, depended on environmental settings. There was no significant difference in participants' satisfaction between types of mobility devices. Also, there was no significant difference in participants' satisfaction with the properties of the device and the related service (for wheeled walkers p = 0.47, manual wheelchairs p = 0.08, powered wheelchairs p = 1.00). Conclusions The results indicate the importance of mobility devices for activities and participation and can guide healthcare workers when providing mobility devices where environmental factors across settings must be kept in mind. Stakeholders should be aware of the value of satisfaction with the devices and related services.
引用
收藏
页码:722 / 729
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] A life course examination of the physical environmental determinants of physical activity behaviour: A "Determinants of Diet and Physical Activity" (DEDIPAC) umbrella systematic literature review
    Carlin, Angela
    Perchoux, Camille
    Puggina, Anna
    Aleksovska, Katina
    Buck, Christoph
    Burns, Con
    Cardon, Greet
    Chantal, Simon
    Ciarapica, Donatella
    Condello, Giancarlo
    Coppinger, Tara
    Cortis, Cristina
    D'Haese, Sara
    De Craemer, Marieke
    Di Blasio, Andrea
    Hansen, Sylvia
    Iacoviello, Licia
    Issartel, Johann
    Izzicupo, Pascal
    Jaeschke, Lina
    Kanning, Martina
    Kennedy, Aileen
    Lakerveld, Jeroen
    Ling, Fiona Chun Man
    Luzak, Agnes
    Napolitano, Giorgio
    Nazare, Julie-Anne
    Pischon, Tobias
    Polito, Angela
    Sannella, Alessandra
    Schulz, Holger
    Sohun, Rhoda
    Steinbrecher, Astrid
    Schlicht, Wolfgang
    Ricciardi, Walter
    MacDonncha, Ciaran
    Capranica, Laura
    Boccia, Stefania
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (08):
  • [2] Consumer-identified barriers and strategies for optimizing technology use in the workplace
    De Jonge, Desleigh M.
    Rodger, Sylvia A.
    [J]. DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION-ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 1 (1-2) : 79 - 88
  • [3] Reliability, validity, and applicability of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0) for adults with multiple sclerosis
    Demers, L
    Monette, M
    Lapierre, Y
    Arnold, DL
    Wolfson, C
    [J]. DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2002, 24 (1-3) : 21 - 30
  • [4] Key dimensions of client satisfaction with assistive technology: A cross-validation of a Canadian measure in the Netherlands
    Demers, L
    Wessels, R
    Weiss-Lambrou, R
    Ska, B
    De Witte, LP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2001, 33 (04) : 187 - 191
  • [5] Item analysis of the Quebec user evaluation of satisfaction with assistive technology (QUEST)
    Demers, L
    Weiss-Lambrou, R
    Ska, B
    [J]. ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 12 (02) : 96 - 105
  • [6] Demers L., 1999, OCCUP THER INT, V6, P159
  • [7] Demers L., 2004, QUEST VERSION 2 0
  • [8] Satisfaction of users with assistive technology service delivery: An exploratory analysis of experiences of parents of children with physical and multiple disabilities
    Desideri, Lorenzo
    Stefanelli, Brunella
    Bitelli, Claudio
    Roentgen, Uta
    Gelderblom, Gert-Jan
    de Witte, Luc
    [J]. DEVELOPMENTAL NEUROREHABILITATION, 2016, 19 (04) : 255 - 266
  • [9] Implementing a routine outcome assessment procedure to evaluate the quality of assistive technology service delivery for children with physical or multiple disabilities: Perceived effectiveness, social cost, and user satisfaction
    Desideri, Lorenzo
    Bizzarri, Martina
    Bitelli, Claudio
    Roentgen, Uta
    Gelderblom, Gert-Jan
    de Witte, Luc
    [J]. ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 28 (01) : 30 - 40
  • [10] Response rate and response quality of Internet-based surveys: An experimental study
    Deutskens, E
    De Ruyter, K
    Wetzels, M
    Oosterveld, P
    [J]. MARKETING LETTERS, 2004, 15 (01) : 21 - 36