The "Keystone Angle": Geometry in Preservation Rhinoplasty

被引:1
|
作者
Nele, Gisella [1 ]
Cavaliere, Annachiara [2 ]
Schonauer, Fabrizio [2 ]
机构
[1] Gisella Nele Body & Mind Ctr, Naples, Italy
[2] Univ Federico II, Unit Plast Surg, Via Sergio Pansini 5, I-80131 Naples, Italy
关键词
Rhinoplasty; Preservation rhinoplasty cartilaginous preservation rhinoplasty; Structural rhinoplasty; Nasal bony dorsum;
D O I
10.1007/s00266-024-03997-0
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Rhinoplasty outcome may depend on different factors and bony dorsum shape has proven to significantly influence the lateral view result. The "Keystone angle" corresponds to the osseocartilaginous angle formed between bony and cartilaginous dorsum. Usually, the "V" shaped bony dorsum is characterized by a more acute "Keystone angle" compared to the "S" shaped bony dorsum. To achieve the ideal dorsum flatness, corresponding to a "Keystone angle" of 180(degrees), different techniques may be used. Bearing these concepts in mind we suggest that preoperative assessment of the "Keystone angle" can guide the choice of the most appropriate technique for each patient.
引用
收藏
页码:1644 / 1646
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A multivariate analysis after preservation rhinoplasty (PR) - a prospective study
    Stergiou, Georges
    Fortuny, Clara Guardiola
    Schweigler, Adrian
    Finocchi, Valerio
    Saban, Yves
    Tremp, Mathias
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2022, 75 (01) : 369 - 373
  • [22] Avoiding Aesthetic Drawbacks and Stigmata in Dorsal Line Preservation Rhinoplasty
    Neves, Jose Carlos
    Arancibia-Tagle, Diego
    FACIAL PLASTIC SURGERY, 2021, 37 (01) : 65 - 75
  • [23] Functional and Radiological Assessment After Preservation Rhinoplasty - A Clinical Study
    Stergiou, Georges
    Tremp, Mathias
    Finocchi, Valerio
    Saban, Yves
    IN VIVO, 2020, 34 (05): : 2659 - 2665
  • [24] Turbinate reduction with complete preservation of mucosa and submucosa during rhinoplasty
    Rudes, M.
    Schwan, F.
    Klass, F.
    Gassner, H. G.
    HNO, 2018, 66 (02) : 111 - 117
  • [25] Reply to: Invited Discussion on: Quality of Life and Outcome After Preservation Rhinoplasty Using the Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation Questionnaire
    Mauro Barone
    Annalisa Cogliandro
    Paolo Persichetti
    Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 2022, 46 : 2104 - 2105
  • [26] Reply to: Invited Discussion on: Quality of Life and Outcome After Preservation Rhinoplasty Using the Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation Questionnaire
    Barone, Mauro
    Cogliandro, Annalisa
    Persichetti, Paolo
    AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2022, 46 (04) : 2104 - 2105
  • [27] Patient Satisfaction following Structural versus Preservation Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review
    Levin, Marc
    Ziai, Hedyeh
    Roskies, Michael
    FACIAL PLASTIC SURGERY, 2020, 36 (05) : 670 - 677
  • [28] Augmentation of the columella-labial angle to prevent the "Smiling deformity" in rhinoplasty
    Cetinkale, O
    Tulunay, S
    Cokneseli, B
    AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 1998, 22 (02) : 106 - 110
  • [29] Evaluation of Lateral Crura Divergence Angle of Iranian Candidates for Primary Rhinoplasty
    Loghmani, Shahriar
    Loghmani, Shirin
    Irani, Mehri Doosti
    Zarei, Mohammadreza
    Maraki, Fatemeh
    WORLD JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2021, 10 (01) : 3 - 7
  • [30] Twelve-Year Experience With Nasofrontal Angle (Radix) Augmentation in Rhinoplasty
    Alawadh, Ibrahim
    Bogari, Ahmad
    Bedaiwi, Reenad
    Alanazi, Hani
    Bafaqeeh, Sameer
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2022, 33 (07) : 2019 - 2023