BiLSTM and SqueezeNet With Transfer Learning for EEG Motor Imagery Classification: Validation With Own Dataset

被引:1
作者
Lazcano-Herrera, Alicia Guadalupe [1 ]
Fuentes-Aguilar, Rita Q. [2 ]
Ramirez-Morales, Adrian [3 ]
Alfaro-Ponce, Mariel [2 ]
机构
[1] Tecnol Monterrey, Sch Engn & Sci, Monterrey 64849, Mexico
[2] Tecnol Monterrey, Inst Adv Mat Sustainable Mfg, Monterrey 64849, Mexico
[3] UPIITA, Inst Politecn Nacl, Mexico City 07340, Mexico
关键词
Electroencephalography; Task analysis; Training; Classification algorithms; Transfer learning; Prediction algorithms; Machine learning algorithms; BCI; EEG signal processing; machine learning; transfer learning; motor/imagery; BRAIN-COMPUTER-INTERFACE; SELECTION;
D O I
10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3328254
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Transfer Learning (TL) is a methodology that allows the re-train of a Machine Learning (ML) algorithm (like Neural Networks or NN's) for a new task with the advantage of the previous training acquired knowledge; with this methodology, it is possible to train NNs for a new task even if the data is scarce. The present study uses this approach to train NNs to classify Electroencephalography (EEG) signals that include Movement/Imagery (MI), first with a publicly available data set and then using it to validate the training process of a small dataset of acquired data. The first part of the article describes the methodology for acquiring EEG signals that imitated the information found in the publicly available dataset Physionet Motor/Imagery. The second part compares the training process for NNs. The first NN is a Bidirectional Long-Short Term Memory (BiLSTM) trained from scratch with the Physionet dataset, and the second NN is a CNN called SqueezeNet trained following the TL method with the small acquired dataset, reaching an accuracy of 91.25% in the BiLSTM with the scratch method and an accuracy of 92.33% with the transfer learning method for the EEG MI signal classification.
引用
收藏
页码:136422 / 136436
页数:15
相关论文
共 53 条
[31]   EEGNet: a compact convolutional neural network for EEG-based brain-computer interfaces [J].
Lawhern, Vernon J. ;
Solon, Amelia J. ;
Waytowich, Nicholas R. ;
Gordon, Stephen M. ;
Hung, Chou P. ;
Lance, Brent J. .
JOURNAL OF NEURAL ENGINEERING, 2018, 15 (05)
[32]  
Li MG, 2016, 2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MECHATRONICS AND AUTOMATION, P1971, DOI 10.1109/ICMA.2016.7558868
[33]  
Madihally S., 2019, Principles of biomedical engineering, Vsecond
[34]  
Misra H, 2004, 2004 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ACOUSTICS, SPEECH, AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, VOL I, PROCEEDINGS, P193
[35]  
Iandola FN, 2016, Arxiv, DOI arXiv:1602.07360
[36]   EEG signal classification using LSTM and improved neural network algorithms [J].
Nagabushanam, P. ;
George, S. Thomas ;
Radha, S. .
SOFT COMPUTING, 2020, 24 (13) :9981-10003
[37]   Real-time EEG classification via coresets for BCI applications [J].
Netzer, Eitan ;
Frid, Alex ;
Feldman, Dan .
ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2020, 89 (89)
[38]  
Ng MC., 2019, Atlas of Intensive Care Quantitative EEG
[39]   EEG-Based Brain-Computer Interfaces Using Motor-Imagery: Techniques and Challenges [J].
Padfield, Natasha ;
Zabalza, Jaime ;
Zhao, Huimin ;
Masero, Valentin ;
Ren, Jinchang .
SENSORS, 2019, 19 (06)
[40]   Signal Quality Evaluation of Emerging EEG Devices [J].
Raduentz, Thea .
FRONTIERS IN PHYSIOLOGY, 2018, 9