Top Rated or Best Seller? Cultural Differences in Responses to Attitudinal versus Behavioral Consensus Cues

被引:8
作者
Barnes, Aaron J. [1 ]
Shavitt, Sharon [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Louisville, Coll Business, Mkt, 110 W Brandeis Ave, Louisville, KY 40208 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Gies Coll Business, 330 Wohlers Hall, Champaign, IL 61820 USA
关键词
cultural self-construal; independent-interdependent; consensus cues; persuasion; POWER DISTANCE BELIEF; BRAND EQUITY; DECISION-MAKING; SELF-EXPRESSION; UNITED-STATES; CHOICE; IMPACT; PREFERENCE; PRODUCT; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1093/jcr/ucad074
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Marketers commonly use consensus cues about others' behavioral choices ("best seller") or their attitudes ("top rated") when labeling products. This article suggests that the effectiveness of these types of cues may differ across cultures in ways that carry implications for marketing practice. Prior research shows that in contexts that give rise to an interdependent cultural self-construal, choices are often responsive to social expectations rather than personal preferences. We propose that, because interdependents expect such behavioral conformity, cues that convey consensus about others' choices may be less diagnostic and, thus, less persuasive than cues that convey consensus about others' attitudes. Five studies examining cultural self-construal in multiple ways, along with two cross-national industry datasets, offer evidence consistent with this reasoning, suggesting that, among interdependents, behavioral consensus cues can actually be less effective than attitudinal ones, reducing persuasion and willingness to pay. However, among independents, because attitudes are assumed to influence behavioral choices, whether the consensus cue is attitudinal or behavioral makes little difference.
引用
收藏
页码:276 / 297
页数:22
相关论文
共 87 条
[1]   The effect of cultural orientation on persuasion [J].
Aaker, JL ;
Maheswaran, D .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1997, 24 (03) :315-328
[2]   Additivity versus attenuation: The role of culture in the resolution of information incongruity [J].
Aaker, JL ;
Sengupta, J .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 9 (02) :67-82
[3]   How far can a brand stretch? Understanding the role of self-construal [J].
Ahluwalia, Rohini .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2008, 45 (03) :337-350
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2023, POWERREVIEWS
[5]   Positioning Multicountry Brands: The Impact of Variation in Cultural Values and Competitive Set [J].
Batra, Rajeev ;
Zhang, Y. Charles ;
Aydinog, Nilufer Z. ;
Feinberg, Fred M. .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2017, 54 (06) :914-931
[6]   Response styles in marketing research: A cross-national investigation [J].
Baumgartner, H ;
Steenkamp, JBEM .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2001, 38 (02) :143-156
[7]   REFERENCE GROUP INFLUENCE ON PRODUCT AND BRAND PURCHASE DECISIONS [J].
BEARDEN, WO ;
ETZEL, MJ .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1982, 9 (02) :183-194
[8]   MEASURING UTILITY BY A SINGLE-RESPONSE SEQUENTIAL METHOD [J].
BECKER, GM ;
DEGROOT, MH ;
MARSCHAK, J .
BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE, 1964, 9 (03) :226-232
[9]   Culture and conformity: A meta-analysis of studies using Asch's (1952b, 1956) Line judgment task [J].
Bond, R ;
Smith, PB .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1996, 119 (01) :111-137
[10]  
Bose Arpita., 2023, ASPIRE SYSTEMS