Technological innovation in GRIs, universities, and the private sector: evidence from the chemical technology network in South Korea

被引:0
作者
Kim, Yong Jin [1 ]
机构
[1] Korea Res Inst Chem Technol, Off R&D Planning, 141 Gajeongro, Daejeon 34114, South Korea
关键词
Technological innovation; Research institutes; R & D; Network analysis; Government-funded research institutes; TRIPLE-HELIX; INDUSTRY; PERFORMANCE; KNOWLEDGE; EVOLUTION; DYNAMICS; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1007/s11192-023-04820-4
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
As national R & D grows in scale, government-funded research institutes (GRIs) are being increasingly criticized for their low research productivity and the role of GRIs itself has become ambiguous. Hence, this study aims to investigate whether GRIs differ from universities or the private sector in terms of technological innovation and if so, how. This study also examines chemical technology as a case study, as technological innovation is active in this field and GRIs are present in relevant areas. Among the research and development projects registered in the National Science and Technology Information Service in South Korea, 4895 projects that used chemical technology were set as analysis targets: 560 projects with GRIs as the research agent, 4097 projects with universities as the research agent and 238 projects with the private sector as the research agent. Of the various indicators of technological innovation, this study examined the overall network structure characteristics and core technologies. The findings are as follows. First, GRIs and universities have similar core technologies, whereas they differ in overall network structure characteristics. Second, GRIs and the private sector have similar overall network structure characteristics, whereas they differ in terms of core technologies. These findings indicate that, at least in chemical technology, GRIs achieve technological innovation in a different form from universities and the private sector. The results of this study will likely provide implications for researchers and policymakers when establishing technological innovation policies for each research agent in the future.
引用
收藏
页码:5929 / 5948
页数:20
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Evolutionary dynamics of scientific collaboration networks: multi-levels and cross-time analysis [J].
Abbasi, Alireza ;
Hossain, Liaquat ;
Uddin, Shahadat ;
Rasmussen, Kim J. R. .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2011, 89 (02) :687-710
[2]   The role of ORIC in the evolution of the triple helix culture of innovation: The case of Pakistan [J].
Altaf, Aqsa ;
Hassan, Ibn E. ;
Batool, Sana .
TECHNOLOGY IN SOCIETY, 2019, 56 :157-166
[3]  
Atay E., 2012, J KNOWLEDGE EC KNOWL, V7, P175
[4]   Cooperation and technological areas in the state universities of Sao Paulo: An analysis from the perspective of the triple helix model [J].
Basso, Fernanda Gisele ;
Pereira, Cristiano Gonsalves ;
Porto, Geciane Silveira .
TECHNOLOGY IN SOCIETY, 2021, 65
[5]   DUALITY OF PERSONS AND GROUPS [J].
BREIGER, RL .
SOCIAL FORCES, 1974, 53 (02) :181-190
[6]   The structure and change of the research collaboration network in Korea (2000-2011): network analysis of joint patents [J].
Choe, Hochull ;
Lee, Duk Hee .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2017, 111 (02) :917-939
[7]   Evolving network characteristics of the asian international aviation market: A weighted network approach [J].
Chung, Hye Min ;
Kwon, Oh Kyoung ;
Han, Ok Soon ;
Kim, Hwa-Joong .
TRANSPORT POLICY, 2020, 99 :299-313
[8]   The emerging importance of knowledge for development: Implications for technology policy and innovation [J].
Conceicao, P ;
Heitor, MV ;
Gibson, DV ;
Shariq, SS .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 1998, 58 (03) :181-202
[9]   How South Korea made itself a global innovation leader [J].
Dayton, Leigh .
NATURE, 2020, 581 (7809) :S54-S56
[10]  
Droescher M., 2018, Chem. Int, V40, DOI DOI 10.1515/CI-2018-0405