Model-Assisted Estimation Through Random Forests in Finite Population Sampling

被引:21
作者
Dagdoug, Mehdi [1 ]
Goga, Camelia [1 ]
Haziza, David [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bourgogne Franche Comte, Lab Math Besancon, Besancon, France
[2] Univ Ottawa, Dept Math & Stat, 150 Louis Pasteur Private, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Model-assisted approach; Model-calibration; Nonparametric regression; Random forest; Survey data; Variance estimation; ASYMPTOTIC CONFIDENCE BANDS; AUXILIARY INFORMATION; VARIANCE REDUCTION; SURVEY DESIGN; APPROXIMATION;
D O I
10.1080/01621459.2021.1987250
中图分类号
O21 [概率论与数理统计]; C8 [统计学];
学科分类号
020208 ; 070103 ; 0714 ;
摘要
In surveys, the interest lies in estimating finite population parameters such as population totals and means. In most surveys, some auxiliary information is available at the estimation stage. This information may be incorporated in the estimation procedures to increase their precision. In this article, we use random forests (RFs) to estimate the functional relationship between the survey variable and the auxiliary variables. In recent years, RFs have become attractive as National Statistical Offices have now access to a variety of data sources, potentially exhibiting a large number of observations on a large number of variables. We establish the theoretical properties of model-assisted procedures based on RFs and derive corresponding variance estimators. A model-calibration procedure for handling multiple survey variables is also discussed. The results of a simulation study suggest that the proposed point and estimation procedures perform well in terms of bias, efficiency and coverage of normal-based confidence intervals, in a wide variety of settings. Finally, we apply the proposed methods using data on radio audiences collected by Mediametrie, a French audience company. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.
引用
收藏
页码:1234 / 1251
页数:18
相关论文
共 65 条
[41]   Nonparametric model calibration estimation in survey sampling [J].
Montanari, GE ;
Ranalli, MG .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2005, 100 (472) :1429-1442
[42]  
Najafabadi MM., 2015, Journal of Big Data, V2, DOI [DOI 10.1186/S40537-014-0007-7, 10.1186/s40537-014-0007-7]
[43]   Selecting the amount of smoothing in nonparametric regression estimation for complex surveys [J].
Opsomer, JD ;
Miller, CP .
JOURNAL OF NONPARAMETRIC STATISTICS, 2005, 17 (05) :593-611
[44]  
Opsomer JD, 2007, J AM STAT ASSOC, V102, P400, DOI 10.1198/016214506000001491
[46]  
Qi YJ, 2012, ENSEMBLE MACHINE LEARNING: METHODS AND APPLICATIONS, P307, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-9326-7_11
[47]  
Robinson P.M., 1983, SANKHYA B, V45, P240
[48]  
Rogez G, 2008, PROC CVPR IEEE, P2142
[49]   Optimal Probability Weights for Inference With Constrained Precision [J].
Santacatterina, Michele ;
Bottai, Matteo .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2018, 113 (523) :983-991
[50]   ON PI-INVERSE WEIGHTING VERSUS BEST LINEAR UNBIASED WEIGHTING IN PROBABILITY SAMPLING [J].
SARNDAL, CE .
BIOMETRIKA, 1980, 67 (03) :639-650