Development of fragility surfaces for pile-supported structures under mainshock-aftershock sequences

被引:3
作者
Qiu, Mengyao [1 ,2 ]
Tian, Shuang [1 ,2 ]
Tang, Liang [1 ,2 ]
Cong, Shengyi [1 ,2 ]
Ling, Xianzhang [1 ,2 ]
Cui, Jie [1 ]
机构
[1] Harbin Inst Technol, Sch Civil Engn, Harbin 150090, Peoples R China
[2] Chongqing Res Inst HIT, Chongqing 401151, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Pile -supported structures; Mainshock aftershock sequences; Fragility assessment surface; Ground motion intensity measures; Probabilistic theorem; 1964 NIIGATA EARTHQUAKE; SEISMIC DEMAND MODELS; INTENSITY MEASURES; SHOWA BRIDGE; COLLAPSE; DAMAGE; LIQUEFACTION; CURVES; BUILDINGS; FAILURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.rineng.2024.101826
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The seismic damage investigations indicated the high probability for the pile-supported structure to suffer further destruction due to the effects of strong aftershocks, but the seismic fragility assessment of pile-supported structures considering aftershocks rarely attracted notice. In this study, the seismic fragility of a pilesupported structure under the mainshock-aftershock sequence is systematically assessed through the simulation results based on a solid-fluid coupling finite element model. Firstly, the numerical model is validated by the test date got from a centrifuge model in order to check its effectiveness. Then the strong motion records recorded at liquefied sites are selected for synthesizing the seismic sequences through scaling and combination. And the Engineering Demand Parameter (EDP) is dertemined as the residual displacement, representing the cumulative damage caused by seismic sequences. Additionally, the quantitative limit states of EDP corresponding to four damage states considering pile-soil interaction is defined by a push-over analysis. Furthermore, since the choice of optimal Intensity Measures for seismic sequences is beneficial for enhancing the credibility, 24 sets of Intensity Measures are assessed from three sides including efficiency, practicality, and proficiency. Finally, the mainshockaftershock fragility surfaces with two Intensity Measures are proposed, considering the random uncertainty. And the results indicate that mainshock aftershock sequences could induce higher exceedance probabilities of a limit state when comparing to under the excitation of mainshock only. The research results could offer a basis for the seismic performance evaluation of the kind of pile-supported structure.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 95 条
[21]   Modeling of cyclic mobility in saturated cohesionless soils [J].
Elgamal, A ;
Yang, ZH ;
Parra, E ;
Ragheb, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PLASTICITY, 2003, 19 (06) :883-905
[22]   Seismic fragility and loss estimation of self-centering steel braced frames under mainshock-aftershock sequences [J].
Fang, Cheng ;
Ping, Boyan ;
Zheng, Yue ;
Ping, Yiwei ;
Ling, Hao .
JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2023, 73
[23]   Time-Dependent Damage Evolution of Reinforced Concrete Bridge Piers: Implications for Multihazard Analysis [J].
Filizadeh, Reza ;
Hernandez, Eric ;
Rosowsky, David .
ASCE-ASME JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY IN ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PART A-CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2023, 9 (01)
[24]   Analytical Fragility Curves of Pile Foundations with Soil-Structure Interaction (SSI) [J].
Forcellini, Davide .
GEOSCIENCES, 2021, 11 (02) :1-19
[25]  
Fukuoka M., 1966, Soils and Foundations, VVI, P45, DOI DOI 10.3208/SANDF1960.6.2_45
[26]   Vector-valued fragility functions for seismic risk evaluation [J].
Gehl, Pierre ;
Seyedi, Darius M. ;
Douglas, John .
BULLETIN OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2013, 11 (02) :365-384
[27]   Comparing a single pile?s axial bearing capacity using numerical modeling and analytical techniques [J].
Ghiasi, Vahed ;
Eskandari, Satar .
RESULTS IN ENGINEERING, 2023, 17
[28]   Comparing the adequacy of alternative ground motion intensity measures for the estimation of structural responses [J].
Giovenale, P ;
Cornell, CA ;
Esteva, L .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2004, 33 (08) :951-979
[29]   Ground motion characteristics and shaking damage of the 11th March 2011 M w9.0 Great East Japan earthquake [J].
Goda, Katsuichiro ;
Pomonis, Antonios ;
Chian, Siau Chen ;
Offord, Mark ;
Saito, Keiko ;
Sammonds, Peter ;
Fraser, Stuart ;
Raby, Alison ;
Macabuag, Joshua .
BULLETIN OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2013, 11 (01) :141-170
[30]  
Halliwell L.J., 2015, CASUALTY ACTUARIAL S, V5