Development of fragility surfaces for pile-supported structures under mainshock-aftershock sequences

被引:1
作者
Qiu, Mengyao [1 ,2 ]
Tian, Shuang [1 ,2 ]
Tang, Liang [1 ,2 ]
Cong, Shengyi [1 ,2 ]
Ling, Xianzhang [1 ,2 ]
Cui, Jie [1 ]
机构
[1] Harbin Inst Technol, Sch Civil Engn, Harbin 150090, Peoples R China
[2] Chongqing Res Inst HIT, Chongqing 401151, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Pile -supported structures; Mainshock aftershock sequences; Fragility assessment surface; Ground motion intensity measures; Probabilistic theorem; 1964 NIIGATA EARTHQUAKE; SEISMIC DEMAND MODELS; INTENSITY MEASURES; SHOWA BRIDGE; COLLAPSE; DAMAGE; LIQUEFACTION; CURVES; BUILDINGS; FAILURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.rineng.2024.101826
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The seismic damage investigations indicated the high probability for the pile-supported structure to suffer further destruction due to the effects of strong aftershocks, but the seismic fragility assessment of pile-supported structures considering aftershocks rarely attracted notice. In this study, the seismic fragility of a pilesupported structure under the mainshock-aftershock sequence is systematically assessed through the simulation results based on a solid-fluid coupling finite element model. Firstly, the numerical model is validated by the test date got from a centrifuge model in order to check its effectiveness. Then the strong motion records recorded at liquefied sites are selected for synthesizing the seismic sequences through scaling and combination. And the Engineering Demand Parameter (EDP) is dertemined as the residual displacement, representing the cumulative damage caused by seismic sequences. Additionally, the quantitative limit states of EDP corresponding to four damage states considering pile-soil interaction is defined by a push-over analysis. Furthermore, since the choice of optimal Intensity Measures for seismic sequences is beneficial for enhancing the credibility, 24 sets of Intensity Measures are assessed from three sides including efficiency, practicality, and proficiency. Finally, the mainshockaftershock fragility surfaces with two Intensity Measures are proposed, considering the random uncertainty. And the results indicate that mainshock aftershock sequences could induce higher exceedance probabilities of a limit state when comparing to under the excitation of mainshock only. The research results could offer a basis for the seismic performance evaluation of the kind of pile-supported structure.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 95 条
  • [1] Fragility Curves for RC Frames Subjected to Tohoku Mainshock-Aftershocks Sequences
    Abdelnaby, Adel E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2018, 22 (05) : 902 - 920
  • [2] Amirabadi R., 2012, RES J APPL SCI ENG T, V4, P3791
  • [3] Determination of optimal probabilistic seismic demand models for pile-supported wharves
    Amirabadi, Rouhollah
    Bargi, Khosrow
    Piroz, Moharram Dolatshahi
    Torkamani, Hamid Heidary
    Mccullough, Nason
    [J]. STRUCTURE AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING, 2014, 10 (09) : 1119 - 1145
  • [4] NGA-West2 Database
    Ancheta, Timothy D.
    Darragh, Robert B.
    Stewart, Jonathan P.
    Seyhan, Emel
    Silva, Walter J.
    Chiou, Brian S. -J.
    Wooddell, Katie E.
    Graves, Robert W.
    Kottke, Albert R.
    Boore, David M.
    Kishida, Tadahiro
    Donahue, Jennifer L.
    [J]. EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2014, 30 (03) : 989 - 1005
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2004, EUROCODE 8 DESIGN ST
  • [6] [Anonymous], 1999, HAZUS99 Useris Manual
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2002, Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures", Part 1 General Provisions and Buildings (Fifth Revision)
  • [8] Fragility of transport assets exposed to multiple hazards: State-of-the-art review toward infrastructural resilience
    Argyroudis, Sotirios A.
    Mitoulis, Stergios A.
    Winter, Mike G.
    Kaynia, Amir M.
    [J]. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2019, 191
  • [9] ASCE, 2014, Seismic Design of Piers and Wharves
  • [10] Efficient Analytical Fragility Function Fitting Using Dynamic Structural Analysis
    Baker, Jack W.
    [J]. EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2015, 31 (01) : 579 - 599