Tripartite Introductions of PGPR, Humic Acid, and N-Fertilizer Improve the Growth and Yield of Sweet Potato under Glasshouse Conditions

被引:0
|
作者
Sadeq, Buraq Musa [1 ]
Zuan, Ali Tan Kee [1 ]
Kasim, Susilawati [1 ]
Alkooranee, Jawadyn Talib [2 ]
Yun, Wong Mui [3 ]
Othman, Nur Maizatul Idayu [4 ]
Akter, Amaily [1 ]
Chompa, Sayma Serine [1 ]
Nabayi, Abba [5 ]
Rahman, Ekhlasur [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Putra Malaysia, Fac Agr, Dept Land Management, Upm Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia
[2] Univ Wasit, Fac Agr, Dept Plant Protect, Wasit, Iraq
[3] Univ Putra Malaysia, Fac Agr, Dept Plant Protect, Upm Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia
[4] Univ Teknol MARA, Fac Plantat & Agrotechnol, Kampus Jasin, Merlimau 77300, Melaka, Malaysia
[5] Fed Univ Dutse, Fac Agr, Dept Soil Sci, PMB 7156, Dutse, Ibrahim Aliyu B, Nigeria
[6] Soil Resource Dev Inst, Div Lab, Dhaka 1215, Bangladesh
来源
SAINS MALAYSIANA | 2024年 / 53卷 / 01期
关键词
Bacterial population; humic acid (HA); PGPR; soil nutrients; sweet potato yield; PROMOTING RHIZOBACTERIA PGPR; INOCULATION; NITROGEN;
D O I
10.17576/jsm-2024-5301-03
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
This study was undertaken to investigate the effects of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) with humic acid (HA) as amendments on the morphological and physiological growth characteristics and yield of Sepang Oren sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas [L.] Lam). The experiment was conducted under glasshouse conditions at the Faculty of Agriculture, Universiti Putra Malaysia, for 110 days. Two factors were used in this experiment: The first factor was PGPR-HA inoculations (UPMB10, UPMRB9, and mixed strains) and non-inoculation-HA, and the second factor was the Nitrogen fertilizer levels (50, 75, and 100%). The treatments were replicated three times and arranged factorially in a randomized complete block design. The results showed that inoculations with PGPRs-HA (UPMRB9 and UPMB10 strains) positively affect the plant growth significantly (SPAD measurements, number of leaves, vine length, root length, leaf area index, root dry weight, shoot dry weight, and root: shoot ratio) of sweet potato upon addition of 50% and 75% of N-fertilizer, respectively. The nutrient content of soil and plant leaf significantly increased by 12-15% and 14-18%, respectively, compared to the uninoculated, when applied with the same inoculation. After 30 days, the population of soil bacteria increased, reaching a value of 8.65 log10 CFU/g soil. The use of PGPR-HA inoculations with N-fertilization resulted in a considerable rise in the majority of plant and soil parameters compared to the treatments without PGPR inoculation. Therefore, PGPR supplemented with humic acid (HA) may be considered a viable and sustainable strategy for enhancing sweet potatoes' morphological and physiological attributes. This technique can result in increased crop productivity and serve as a substitute for nitrogen -based fertilizers.
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 37
页数:15
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] Responses of root physiological characteristics and yield of sweet potato to humic acid urea fertilizer
    Chen, Xiaoguang
    Kou, Meng
    Tang, Zhonghou
    Zhang, Aijun
    Li, Hongmin
    Wei, Meng
    PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (12):
  • [2] The use of humic acid urea fertilizer for increasing yield and utilization of nitrogen in sweet potato
    Chen, Xiaoguang
    Kou, Meng
    Tang, Zhonghou
    Zhang, Aijun
    Li, Hongmin
    PLANT SOIL AND ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 63 (05) : 201 - 206
  • [3] Application of humic acid compound fertilizer for increasing sweet potato yield and improving the soil fertility
    Wang, Danfeng
    Chen, Xiaoguang
    Tang, Zhonghou
    Liu, Ming
    Jin, Rong
    Zhang, Aijun
    Zhao, Peng
    JOURNAL OF PLANT NUTRITION, 2022, 45 (13) : 1933 - 1941
  • [4] Applications of humic and fulvic acid under saline soil conditions to improve growth and yield in barley
    Alsudays, Ibtisam Mohammed
    Alshammary, Fowzia Hamdan
    Alabdallah, Nadiyah M.
    Alatawi, Aishah
    Alotaibi, Mashael M.
    Alwutayd, Khairiah Mubarak
    Alharbi, Maha Mohammed
    Alghanem, Suliman M. S.
    Alzuaibr, Fahad Mohammed
    Gharib, Hany S.
    Awad-Allah, Mamdouh M. A.
    BMC PLANT BIOLOGY, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [5] Applications of humic and fulvic acid under saline soil conditions to improve growth and yield in barley
    Ibtisam Mohammed Alsudays
    Fowzia Hamdan Alshammary
    Nadiyah M. Alabdallah
    Aishah Alatawi
    Mashael M. Alotaibi
    Khairiah Mubarak Alwutayd
    Maha Mohammed Alharbi
    Suliman M. S. Alghanem
    Fahad Mohammed Alzuaibr
    Hany S. Gharib
    Mamdouh M. A. Awad-Allah
    BMC Plant Biology, 24
  • [6] The impact of humic acid compound fertilizer on sweet potato variety Jishu 25: A comprehensive study on dry matter, root yield, and starch properties
    Duan, Wenxue
    Li, Guanghua
    Zhang, Haiyan
    Wang, Qingmei
    Xie, Beitao
    Zhang, Liming
    SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE, 2024, 327
  • [7] THE IMPACT OF ORGANIC N FERTILIZER AND TRICHODERMA SP ON THE GROWTH AND YIELD OF TWO SWEET PEPPER VARIETIES UNDER THE GREENHOUSE
    Mohammed Jasim, Mohammed
    Hoza, Gheorghita
    Hoobi Shalal, Hadi
    Neata, Gabriela
    SCIENTIFIC PAPERS-SERIES B-HORTICULTURE, 2019, 63 (01): : 425 - 431
  • [8] Growth, yield and quality of strawberry as affected by fertilizer N rate and biofertilizers inoculation under greenhouse conditions
    Reddy, G. Chandramohan
    Goyal, R. K.
    JOURNAL OF PLANT NUTRITION, 2020, 44 (01) : 46 - 58
  • [9] Humic Acid-Amended Formulation Improves Shelf-Life of Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) Under Laboratory Conditions
    Sadeq, Buraq Musa
    Zuan, Ali Tan Kee
    Kasim, Susilawati
    Yun, Wong Mui
    Othman, Nur Maizatul Idayu
    Alkooranee, Jawadyn Talib
    Chompa, Sayma Serine
    Akter, Amaily
    Rahman, Md Ekhlasur
    PERTANIKA JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 31 (03): : 1137 - 1155
  • [10] Seed potato (Solanum tuberosum L) yield and tuber number increase after foliar applications of cytokinins and gibberellic acid under field and glasshouse conditions
    Caldiz, DO
    PLANT GROWTH REGULATION, 1996, 20 (03) : 185 - 188