Does Administrative Reform Improve the Business Environment in China? A Mixed-Method Analysis Based on Administrative Burden Theory

被引:2
作者
Zhang Chun [1 ]
Liao Fuchong [2 ]
Wang Xiaojun [3 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ, Sch Business, Changsha, Peoples R China
[2] Cent South Univ, Sch Publ Adm, Changsha, Peoples R China
[3] Jiang Xi Normal Univ, Coll Polit Sci & Law, Nanchang, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
关键词
administrative reform; administrative burden; favorable business environment; mixed method analysis; government-business interaction; China; GOVERNMENT; PERFORMANCE; REDUCTION;
D O I
10.24193/tras.70E.2
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
Does administrative reform boost the favorable business environment? What is the mechanism underlying such reform? This study explores the relationship between administrative reform and the business environment in China via a mixed-method approach. This paper extends administrative burden theory to government-company interactions and then proposes a framework that bridges administrative reform and the business environment. Based on firm-level survey data and case data, this quantitative analysis confirms that administrative reform can significantly boost the favorable business environment and that administrative burden is a mediating variable during this process. The qualitative comparative analysis contends that there are three different configurations that can boost the favorable business environment: collaborative governance, government-driven, and enterprise-driven configurations. Theoretically, this paper extends the administrative burden theory, which brings companies into this theory as new actors. We also provide reform advice for practitioners.
引用
收藏
页码:28 / 44
页数:17
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Market power, EU integration and privatization: The case of Romania [J].
Asaftei, Gabriel ;
Parmeter, Christopher F. .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE ECONOMICS, 2010, 38 (03) :340-356
[2]   Why Do Policymakers Support Administrative Burdens? The Roles of Deservingness, Political Ideology, and Personal Experience [J].
Baekgaard, Martin ;
Moynihan, Donald P. ;
Thomsen, Mette Kjaergaard .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND THEORY, 2021, 31 (01) :184-200
[3]   "It Takes a While to Get Used to": The Costs of Redeeming Public Benefits [J].
Barnes, Carolyn Y. .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND THEORY, 2021, 31 (02) :295-310
[4]   Robotic Bureaucracy: Administrative Burden and Red Tape in University Research [J].
Bozeman, Barry ;
Youtie, Jan .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2020, 80 (01) :157-162
[5]   Red Tape, Rule Burden, and Legitimate Performance Trade-Offs: Results from a Vignette Experiment [J].
Campbell, Jesse W. .
PUBLIC PERFORMANCE & MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2020, 43 (04) :741-765
[6]   A New Index of the Business Environment for Microfinance [J].
Cull, Robert ;
Navajas, Sergio ;
Nishida, Ippei ;
Zeiler, Renate .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2015, 70 :357-388
[7]   "Hostages to Compliance" :Towards a Reasonableness Test for Administrative Burdens [J].
Doughty, Meghan ;
Baehler, Karen J. .
PERSPECTIVES ON PUBLIC MANAGEMENT AND GOVERNANCE, 2020, 3 (04) :273-287
[8]   Administrative Easing: Rule Reduction and Medicaid Enrollment [J].
Fox, Ashley M. ;
Feng, Wenhui ;
Stazyk, Edmund C. .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2020, 80 (01) :104-117
[9]   How important is customer orientation for firm performance? A fuzzy set analysis of orientations, strategies, and environments [J].
Frambach, Ruud T. ;
Fiss, Peer C. ;
Ingenbleek, Paul T. M. .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2016, 69 (04) :1428-1436
[10]   The politics of performance measurement in China [J].
Jing, Yijia ;
Cui, Yangyang ;
Li, Danyao .
POLICY AND SOCIETY, 2015, 34 (01) :49-61