CycleSeg: Simultaneous synthetic CT generation and unsupervised segmentation for MR-only radiotherapy treatment planning of prostate cancer

被引:1
作者
Luu, Huan Minh [1 ]
Yoo, Gyu Sang [2 ]
Park, Won [3 ,5 ]
Park, Sung-Hong [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Korea Adv Inst Sci & Technol, Dept Bio & Brain Engn, Daejeon, South Korea
[2] Chungbuk Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Cheongju, South Korea
[3] Samsung Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Korea Adv Inst Sci & Technol KAIST, Dept Bio & Brain Engn, Rm 1002,CMS E16 Bldg,291 Daehak Ro, Daejeon 34141, South Korea
[5] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Samsung Med Ctr, Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Seoul 06351, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
CycleSeg; deep learning; prostate; radiotherapy treatment planning; synthetic CT; unsupervised domain adaptation; AUTO-SEGMENTATION; IMAGE; VOLUMES; DELINEATION; ORGANS; TUMOR; RISK;
D O I
10.1002/mp.16976
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
BackgroundMR-only radiotherapy treatment planning is an attractive alternative to conventional workflow, reducing scan time and ionizing radiation. It is crucial to derive the electron density map or synthetic CT (sCT) from MR data to perform dose calculations to enable MR-only treatment planning. Automatic segmentation of relevant organs in MR images can accelerate the process by preventing the time-consuming manual contouring step. However, the segmentation label is available only for CT data in many cases.PurposeWe propose CycleSeg, a unified framework that generates sCT and corresponding segmentation from MR images without access to MR segmentation labelsMethodsCycleSeg utilizes the CycleGAN formulation to perform unpaired synthesis of sCT and image alignment. To enable MR (sCT) segmentation, CycleSeg incorporates unsupervised domain adaptation by using a pseudo-labeling approach with feature alignment in semantic segmentation space. In contrast to previous approaches that perform segmentation on MR data, CycleSeg could perform segmentation on both MR and sCT. Experiments were performed with data from prostate cancer patients, with 78/7/10 subjects in the training/validation/test sets, respectively.ResultsCycleSeg showed the best sCT generation results, with the lowest mean absolute error of 102.2 and the lowest Frechet inception distance of 13.0. CycleSeg also performed best on MR segmentation, with the highest average dice score of 81.0 and 81.1 for MR and sCT segmentation, respectively. Ablation experiments confirmed the contribution of the proposed components of CycleSeg.ConclusionCycleSeg effectively synthesized CT and performed segmentation on MR images of prostate cancer patients. Thus, CycleSeg has the potential to expedite MR-only radiotherapy treatment planning, reducing the prescribed scans and manual segmentation effort, and increasing throughput.
引用
收藏
页码:4365 / 4379
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Dosimetric impact of deep learning-based CT auto-segmentation on radiation therapy treatment planning for prostate cancer
    Kawula, Maria
    Purice, Dinu
    Li, Minglun
    Vivar, Gerome
    Ahmadi, Seyed-Ahmad
    Parodi, Katia
    Belka, Claus
    Landry, Guillaume
    Kurz, Christopher
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2022, 17 (01)
  • [42] Deep learning based automatic segmentation of the Internal Pudendal Artery in definitive radiotherapy treatment planning of localized prostate cancer
    Balagopal, Anjali
    Dohopolski, Michael
    Kwon, Young Suk
    Montalvo, Steven
    Morgan, Howard
    Bai, Ti
    Nguyen, Dan
    Liang, Xiao
    Zhong, Xinran
    Lin, Mu-Han
    Desai, Neil
    Jiang, Steve
    PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2024, 30
  • [43] Technical Note: U-net-generated synthetic CT images for magnetic resonance imaging-only prostate intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatment planning
    Chen, Shupeng
    Qin, An
    Zhou, Dingyi
    Yan, Di
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (12) : 5659 - 5665
  • [44] Head-and-Neck MRI-only radiotherapy treatment planning: From acquisition in treatment position to pseudo-CT generation
    Largent, A.
    Marage, L.
    Gicquiau, I
    Nunes, J-C
    Reynaert, N.
    Castelli, J.
    Chajon, E.
    Acosta, O.
    Gambarota, G.
    de Crevoisier, R.
    Saint-Jalmes, H.
    CANCER RADIOTHERAPIE, 2020, 24 (04): : 288 - 297
  • [45] First experience of autonomous, un-supervised treatment planning integrated in adaptive MR-guided radiotherapy and delivered to a patient with prostate cancer
    Kuenzel, Luise A.
    Nachbar, Marcel
    Hagmueller, Markus
    Gani, Cihan
    Boeke, Simon
    Zips, Daniel
    Thorwarth, Daniela
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2021, 159 : 197 - 201
  • [46] FDG-PET/CT and MR imaging for target volume delineation in rectal cancer radiotherapy treatment planning: a systematic review
    Olanloye, Elizabeth E.
    Ramlaul, Aarthi
    Ntekim, Atara, I
    Adeyemi, Segun S.
    JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE, 2022, 21 (04) : 529 - 539
  • [47] Linac- and CyberKnife-based MRI-only treatment planning of prostate SBRT using an optimized synthetic CT calibration curve
    Scholey, Jessica
    Nano, Tomi
    Singhrao, Kamal
    Mohammad, Osama
    Singer, Lisa
    Larson, Peder Eric Zufall
    Descovich, Martina
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2024, 25 (09):
  • [48] Dosimetric impact of deep learning-based CT auto-segmentation on radiation therapy treatment planning for prostate cancer
    Maria Kawula
    Dinu Purice
    Minglun Li
    Gerome Vivar
    Seyed-Ahmad Ahmadi
    Katia Parodi
    Claus Belka
    Guillaume Landry
    Christopher Kurz
    Radiation Oncology, 17
  • [49] Investigating the Clinical Aspects of Using CT vs. CT-MRI Images During Organ Delineation and Treatment Planning in Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy
    Tzikas, A.
    Karaiskos, P.
    Papanikolaou, N.
    Sandilos, P.
    Koutsouveli, E.
    Lavdas, E.
    Scarleas, C.
    Dardoufas, K.
    Lind, B. K.
    Mavroidis, P.
    TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2011, 10 (03) : 231 - 242
  • [50] MRI-based treatment planning for proton radiotherapy: dosimetric validation of a deep learning-based liver synthetic CT generation method
    Liu, Yingzi
    Lei, Yang
    Wang, Yinan
    Wang, Tonghe
    Ren, Lei
    Lin, Liyong
    McDonald, Mark
    Curran, Walter J.
    Liu, Tian
    Zhou, Jun
    Yang, Xiaofeng
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2019, 64 (14)