Using the snake optimization metaheuristic algorithms to extract the photovoltaic cells parameters

被引:20
|
作者
Belabbes, Fatima [1 ]
Cotfas, Daniel T. [2 ]
Cotfas, Petru A. [2 ]
Medles, Mourad [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Djillali Liabes Sidi Bel Abbes, Dept Elect, Lab Elaborat & Caracterisat Mat, BP89, Sidi Bel Abbes 22000, Algeria
[2] Transilvania Univ Brasov, Dept Elect & Comp, Eroilor 29, Brasov 500036, Romania
关键词
Photovoltaic cells; Parameters determining; Algorithms; Snake; SOLAR; MODELS; IDENTIFICATION; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.enconman.2023.117373
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
The accurate extraction of photovoltaic cells and panels parameters is very important in order to precisely forecast their generated energy, to rapidly identify the maximum power point, both for the manufacturer in order to verify the quality control during the production process, and for the researchers to improve their quality, efficiency and also study the photovoltaic cells degradation. This paper is the first to propose the usage of the Snake optimization metaheuristic algorithms to extract the parameters of three photovoltaic cells: monocrystalline commercial silicon, amorphous silicon, and RTC France. The Snake algorithms are used for the one diode and two diode models to extract five and seven parameters respectively. The root mean square error statistical test has been performed in order to prove the algorithm performance. The comparison with the algorithms published in specialized literature reveals that the Snake algorithm outperforms several others, but is not the best. An improved version is developed and the results show that it gives better results than, or at least the same as the best ones. The improvement in root mean square error, when the improved snake algorithm is used, is 16% in the case of the monocrystalline silicon photovoltaic cell for the two diode model, 5.3% in the case of the amorphous silicon photovoltaic cell for the two diode model, and it is slightly better for the RTC France photovoltaic cell, from 0.002 to 0.11% when the best algorithms are considered. The Snake algorithms give very good results, especially the improved one, even for a small population size and a limited number of iterations. Thus, for the improved snake algorithm, the iterations number and the population size are 100 and 80, in the case of the monocrystalline photovoltaic cells, for one diode model, and 200 and 40 respectively for two diode model, 100 and 120 in the case of the amorphous silicon photovoltaic cell for one diode model and 120 and 120 respectively for two diode model, 150 and 100 in the case of RTC photovoltaic cell for one diode model and 150 and 80 respectively for two diode model. This reduces the computational time for the extraction of the photovoltaic cell parameters. The computational time for the improved snake algorithm is half of the necessary one for one of the best algorithms, the hybrid successive discretization algorithm. Therefore, the snake optimization algorithm, especially the improved one is one of the best algorithms that can be used for the parameters extraction of the photovoltaic cells.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Parameters identification for a photovoltaic module: comparison between PSO, GA and CS metaheuristic optimisation algorithms
    Ben Ali, Ines
    Naouar, Mohamed Wissem
    Monmasson, Eric
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MODELLING IDENTIFICATION AND CONTROL, 2021, 38 (3-4) : 211 - 230
  • [32] Metaheuristic algorithms for combinatorial optimization problems
    Iori M.
    4OR, 2005, 3 (2) : 163 - 166
  • [33] Implementing metaheuristic optimization algorithms with JECoLi
    Evangelista, Pedro
    Maia, Paulo
    Rocha, Miguel
    2009 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS DESIGN AND APPLICATIONS, 2009, : 505 - 510
  • [34] The Mosaic of Metaheuristic Algorithms in Structural Optimization
    Lagaros, Nikos D.
    Plevris, Vagelis
    Kallioras, Nikos Ath
    ARCHIVES OF COMPUTATIONAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING, 2022, 29 (07) : 5457 - 5492
  • [35] The Mosaic of Metaheuristic Algorithms in Structural Optimization
    Nikos D. Lagaros
    Vagelis Plevris
    Nikos Ath. Kallioras
    Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 2022, 29 : 5457 - 5492
  • [36] A novel solution in the simultaneous deep optimization of RGB-D camera calibration parameters using metaheuristic algorithms
    Safaei, Amir
    Fazli, Saeid
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SCIENCES, 2018, 26 (02) : 743 - 754
  • [37] Extraction of the Multijunction Solar Cell Parameters Using Two Metaheuristic Algorithms
    Cotfas, Daniel T.
    Madhiarasan, Manoharan
    Cotfas, Petru A.
    IEEE ACCESS, 2024, 12 : 109634 - 109656
  • [38] A Novel Optimization Approach Using Chaos Game Optimization Algorithm for Parameters Estimation of Photovoltaic Cells
    Wereda, Galal Borham
    Diaaeldin, Ibrahim Mohamed
    Omar, Othman A. M.
    Attia, Mahmoud A.
    Badr, Ahmed O.
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2025, 17 (04)
  • [39] Parameter Meta-optimization of Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms
    Neumueller, Christoph
    Wagner, Stefan
    Kronberger, Gabriel
    Affenzeller, Michael
    COMPUTER AIDED SYSTEMS THEORY - EUROCAST 2011, PT I, 2012, 6927 : 367 - 374
  • [40] Fuzzy Finite Element Model Updating Using Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms
    Boulkaibet, I.
    Marwala, T.
    Friswell, M. I.
    Khodaparast, H. H.
    Adhikari, S.
    SPECIAL TOPICS IN STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, VOL 6, 2017, : 91 - 101