Using the snake optimization metaheuristic algorithms to extract the photovoltaic cells parameters

被引:34
作者
Belabbes, Fatima [1 ]
Cotfas, Daniel T. [2 ]
Cotfas, Petru A. [2 ]
Medles, Mourad [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Djillali Liabes Sidi Bel Abbes, Dept Elect, Lab Elaborat & Caracterisat Mat, BP89, Sidi Bel Abbes 22000, Algeria
[2] Transilvania Univ Brasov, Dept Elect & Comp, Eroilor 29, Brasov 500036, Romania
关键词
Photovoltaic cells; Parameters determining; Algorithms; Snake; SOLAR; MODELS; IDENTIFICATION; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.enconman.2023.117373
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
The accurate extraction of photovoltaic cells and panels parameters is very important in order to precisely forecast their generated energy, to rapidly identify the maximum power point, both for the manufacturer in order to verify the quality control during the production process, and for the researchers to improve their quality, efficiency and also study the photovoltaic cells degradation. This paper is the first to propose the usage of the Snake optimization metaheuristic algorithms to extract the parameters of three photovoltaic cells: monocrystalline commercial silicon, amorphous silicon, and RTC France. The Snake algorithms are used for the one diode and two diode models to extract five and seven parameters respectively. The root mean square error statistical test has been performed in order to prove the algorithm performance. The comparison with the algorithms published in specialized literature reveals that the Snake algorithm outperforms several others, but is not the best. An improved version is developed and the results show that it gives better results than, or at least the same as the best ones. The improvement in root mean square error, when the improved snake algorithm is used, is 16% in the case of the monocrystalline silicon photovoltaic cell for the two diode model, 5.3% in the case of the amorphous silicon photovoltaic cell for the two diode model, and it is slightly better for the RTC France photovoltaic cell, from 0.002 to 0.11% when the best algorithms are considered. The Snake algorithms give very good results, especially the improved one, even for a small population size and a limited number of iterations. Thus, for the improved snake algorithm, the iterations number and the population size are 100 and 80, in the case of the monocrystalline photovoltaic cells, for one diode model, and 200 and 40 respectively for two diode model, 100 and 120 in the case of the amorphous silicon photovoltaic cell for one diode model and 120 and 120 respectively for two diode model, 150 and 100 in the case of RTC photovoltaic cell for one diode model and 150 and 80 respectively for two diode model. This reduces the computational time for the extraction of the photovoltaic cell parameters. The computational time for the improved snake algorithm is half of the necessary one for one of the best algorithms, the hybrid successive discretization algorithm. Therefore, the snake optimization algorithm, especially the improved one is one of the best algorithms that can be used for the parameters extraction of the photovoltaic cells.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 40 条
[21]   A logistic chaotic JAYA algorithm for parameters identification of photovoltaic cell and module models [J].
Jian, Xianzhong ;
Weng, Zhiyuan .
OPTIK, 2020, 203
[22]   Parameter's extraction of solar photovoltaic models using an improved differential evolution algorithm [J].
Kharchouf, Youssef ;
Herbazi, Rachid ;
Chahboun, Adil .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 251
[23]   A comprehensive survey on meta-heuristic algorithms for parameter extraction of photovoltaic models [J].
Li, Shuijia ;
Gong, Wenyin ;
Gu, Qiong .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2021, 141
[24]   Parameters estimation of solar photovoltaic models via a self-adaptive ensemble-based differential evolution [J].
Liang, Jing ;
Qiao, Kangjia ;
Yu, Kunjie ;
Ge, Shilei ;
Qu, Boyang ;
Xu, Ruohao ;
Li, Ke .
SOLAR ENERGY, 2020, 207 :336-346
[25]   Parameters identification of photovoltaic models using niche-based particle swarm optimization in parallel computing architecture [J].
Lin, Xiankun ;
Wu, Yuhang .
ENERGY, 2020, 196
[26]   Horizontal and vertical crossover of Harris hawk optimizer with Nelder-Mead simplex for parameter estimation of photovoltaic models [J].
Liu, Yun ;
Chong, Guoshuang ;
Heidari, Ali Asghar ;
Chen, Huiling ;
Liang, Guoxi ;
Ye, Xiaojia ;
Cai, Zhennao ;
Wangg, Mingjing .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 223
[27]   Barnacles Mating Optimizer Algorithm to Extract the Parameters of the Photovoltaic Cells and Panels [J].
Madhiarasan, Manoharan ;
Cotfas, Daniel T. ;
Cotfas, Petru A. .
SENSORS, 2022, 22 (18)
[28]   The Whale Optimization Algorithm [J].
Mirjalili, Seyedali ;
Lewis, Andrew .
ADVANCES IN ENGINEERING SOFTWARE, 2016, 95 :51-67
[29]   An analysis on the performance of metaheuristic algorithms for the estimation of parameters in solar cell models [J].
Navarro, Mario A. ;
Oliva, Diego ;
Ramos-Michel, Alfonso ;
Haro, Eduardo H. .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 276
[30]   Parameter estimation of photovoltaic cells using improved Lozi map based chaotic optimization Algorithm [J].
Pourmousa, Nafiseh ;
Ebrahimi, S. Mohammadreza ;
Malekzadeh, Milad ;
Alizadeh, Mojtaba .
SOLAR ENERGY, 2019, 180 :180-191