Quadratic Multilinear Discriminant Analysis for Tensorial Data Classification

被引:1
|
作者
Minoccheri, Cristian [1 ]
Alge, Olivia [1 ]
Gryak, Jonathan [2 ]
Najarian, Kayvan [1 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Derksen, Harm [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Computat Med & Bioinformat, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] CUNY Queens Coll, Comp Sci Dept, New York, NY 11367 USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Michigan Inst Data Sci MIDAS, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[4] Univ Michigan, Michigan Ctr Integrat Res Crit Care MCIRCC, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[5] Univ Michigan, Emergency Med, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[6] Northeastern Univ, Math Dept, Boston, MA 02115 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
tensors; multilinear discriminant analysis; quadratic discriminant analysis; classification; INVARIANT-THEORY; OPTIMIZATION; TOOLBOX;
D O I
10.3390/a16020104
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Over the past decades, there has been an increase of attention to adapting machine learning methods to fully exploit the higher order structure of tensorial data. One problem of great interest is tensor classification, and in particular the extension of linear discriminant analysis to the multilinear setting. We propose a novel method for multilinear discriminant analysis that is radically different from the ones considered so far, and it is the first extension to tensors of quadratic discriminant analysis. Our proposed approach uses invariant theory to extend the nearest Mahalanobis distance classifier to the higher-order setting, and to formulate a well-behaved optimization problem. We extensively test our method on a variety of synthetic data, outperforming previously proposed MDA techniques. We also show how to leverage multi-lead ECG data by constructing tensors via taut string, and use our method to classify healthy signals versus unhealthy ones; our method outperforms state-of-the-art MDA methods, especially after adding significant levels of noise to the signals. Our approach reached an AUC of 0.95(0.03) on clean signals-where the second best method reached 0.91(0.03)-and an AUC of 0.89(0.03) after adding noise to the signals (with a signal-to-noise-ratio of -30)-where the second best method reached 0.85(0.05). Our approach is fundamentally different than previous work in this direction, and proves to be faster, more stable, and more accurate on the tests we performed.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A review of quadratic discriminant analysis for high-dimensional data
    Qin, Yingli
    WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS, 2018, 10 (04)
  • [22] New Quadratic Discriminant Analysis Algorithms for Correlated Audiometric Data
    Guo, Fuyu
    Zucker, David M.
    Vaden Jr, Kenneth I.
    Curhan, Sharon
    Dubno, Judy R.
    Wang, Molin
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2024, 43 (29) : 5473 - 5483
  • [23] Multilinear Laplacian discriminant analysis for gait recognition
    Chhatrala, Risil
    Jadhav, Dattatray V.
    IET COMPUTER VISION, 2017, 11 (02) : 153 - 160
  • [24] Multilinear class-specific discriminant analysis
    Dat Thanh Tran
    Gabbouj, Moncef
    Iosifidis, Alexandros
    PATTERN RECOGNITION LETTERS, 2017, 100 : 131 - 136
  • [25] Multilinear Spatial Discriminant Analysis for Dimensionality Reduction
    Yuan, Sen
    Mao, Xia
    Chen, Lijiang
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING, 2017, 26 (06) : 2669 - 2681
  • [27] Quadratic discriminant analysis by projection
    Wu, Ruiyang
    Hao, Ning
    JOURNAL OF MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS, 2022, 190
  • [28] Bayesian quadratic discriminant analysis
    Srivastava, Santosh
    Gupta, Maya R.
    Frigyik, Bela A.
    JOURNAL OF MACHINE LEARNING RESEARCH, 2007, 8 : 1277 - 1305
  • [29] Generalized quadratic discriminant analysis
    Bose, Smarajit
    Pal, Amita
    SahaRay, Rita
    Nayak, Jitadeepa
    PATTERN RECOGNITION, 2015, 48 (08) : 2676 - 2684
  • [30] Bayesian quadratic discriminant analysis
    Srivastava, Santosh
    Gupta, Maya R.
    Frigyik, Béla A.
    Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2007, 8 : 1277 - 1305