The Character Lens: A Person-Centered Perspective on Moral Recognition and Ethical Decision-Making

被引:15
作者
Helzer, Erik G. [1 ]
Cohen, Taya R. [2 ]
Kim, Yeonjeong [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Naval Postgrad Sch, 555 Dyer Rd, Monterey, CA 93943 USA
[2] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Tepper Sch Business, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[3] MIT, Sloan Sch Management, 77 Massachusetts Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
关键词
Moral character; Ethical decision-making; Moral recognition; Trustworthiness; Whistleblowing; FIT INDEXES; SENSITIVITY; ORGANIZATIONS; AGREEMENT; AWARENESS; TRAITS; MODEL; TRUST; IDENTITY; SCALE;
D O I
10.1007/s10551-021-05010-z
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We introduce the character lens perspective to account for stable patterns in the way that individuals make sense of and construct the ethical choices and situations they face. We propose that the way that individuals make sense of their present experience is an enduring feature of their broader moral character, and that differences between people in ethical decision-making are traceable to upstream differences in the way that people disambiguate and give meaning to their present context. In three studies, we found that individuals with higher standing on moral character (operationalized as a combination of Honesty-Humility, Guilt Proneness, and Moral Identity Centrality) tended to construe their present context in more moral or ethical terms, and this difference in moral recognition accounted for differences in the ethical choices they made. Moreover, individuals with higher levels of moral character maintained high levels of moral recognition even as pressure to ignore moral considerations increased. Accordingly, this work unifies research on moral character, moral recognition, sensemaking, and judgment and decision-making into a person-centered account of ethical decision-making, highlighting the way decision-makers actively and directly shape the choice contexts to which they must respond.
引用
收藏
页码:483 / 500
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Character-Infused Ethical Decision Making
    Nguyen, Brenda
    Crossan, Mary
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2022, 178 (01) : 171 - 191
  • [22] Key person ethical decision-making and substandard drugs rejection intentions
    Ren, Xiaohong
    Wang, Xiaoyan
    Sun, He
    PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (03):
  • [23] Moral Intensity and School Principals' Ethical Decision-Making: An Empirical Study
    Feng, I. Feng
    ASIA-PACIFIC EDUCATION RESEARCHER, 2013, 22 (04) : 531 - 540
  • [24] Unpacking the effects of moral intensity and cultural values on ethical decision-making
    Bekoe, Rita Amoah
    Owusu, Godfred Mathew Yaw
    Korankye, Gabriel
    Donkor, Josephine Baaba Agyekum
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ETHICS AND SYSTEMS, 2025,
  • [25] Autonomous Agents and Ethical Decision-Making
    Cervantes, Jose-Antonio
    Rodriguez, Luis-Felipe
    Lopez, Sonia
    Ramos, Felix
    Robles, Francisco
    COGNITIVE COMPUTATION, 2016, 8 (02) : 278 - 296
  • [26] A perspective on the whistleblowing intention of internal auditors: an integrated ethical decision-making model
    Antoh, Alfiana
    Sholihin, Mahfud
    Sugiri, Slamet
    Arifa, Choirunnisa
    COGENT BUSINESS & MANAGEMENT, 2024, 11 (01):
  • [27] How do person-centered outcome measures enable shared decision-making for people with dementia and family carers?-A systematic review
    Aworinde, Jesutofunmi
    Ellis-Smith, Clare
    Gillam, Juliet
    Roche, Moise
    Coombes, Lucy
    Yorganci, Emel
    Evans, Catherine J.
    ALZHEIMERS & DEMENTIA-TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH & CLINICAL INTERVENTIONS, 2022, 8 (01)
  • [28] Moral Intensity and School Principals’ Ethical Decision-Making: An Empirical Study
    Feng I. Feng
    The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 2013, 22 : 531 - 540
  • [29] Ethical decision making: The person in the process
    Mattison, M
    SOCIAL WORK, 2000, 45 (03) : 201 - 212
  • [30] Moral intensity, ethical decision making, and whistleblowing intention
    Valentine, Sean
    Godkin, Lynn
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2019, 98 : 277 - 288