The Character Lens: A Person-Centered Perspective on Moral Recognition and Ethical Decision-Making

被引:15
|
作者
Helzer, Erik G. [1 ]
Cohen, Taya R. [2 ]
Kim, Yeonjeong [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Naval Postgrad Sch, 555 Dyer Rd, Monterey, CA 93943 USA
[2] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Tepper Sch Business, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[3] MIT, Sloan Sch Management, 77 Massachusetts Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
关键词
Moral character; Ethical decision-making; Moral recognition; Trustworthiness; Whistleblowing; FIT INDEXES; SENSITIVITY; ORGANIZATIONS; AGREEMENT; AWARENESS; TRAITS; MODEL; TRUST; IDENTITY; SCALE;
D O I
10.1007/s10551-021-05010-z
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We introduce the character lens perspective to account for stable patterns in the way that individuals make sense of and construct the ethical choices and situations they face. We propose that the way that individuals make sense of their present experience is an enduring feature of their broader moral character, and that differences between people in ethical decision-making are traceable to upstream differences in the way that people disambiguate and give meaning to their present context. In three studies, we found that individuals with higher standing on moral character (operationalized as a combination of Honesty-Humility, Guilt Proneness, and Moral Identity Centrality) tended to construe their present context in more moral or ethical terms, and this difference in moral recognition accounted for differences in the ethical choices they made. Moreover, individuals with higher levels of moral character maintained high levels of moral recognition even as pressure to ignore moral considerations increased. Accordingly, this work unifies research on moral character, moral recognition, sensemaking, and judgment and decision-making into a person-centered account of ethical decision-making, highlighting the way decision-makers actively and directly shape the choice contexts to which they must respond.
引用
收藏
页码:483 / 500
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Character Lens: A Person-Centered Perspective on Moral Recognition and Ethical Decision-Making
    Erik G. Helzer
    Taya R. Cohen
    Yeonjeong Kim
    Journal of Business Ethics, 2023, 182 : 483 - 500
  • [2] Military Ethical Decision Making: The Effects of Option Choice and Perspective Taking on Moral Decision-Making Processes and Intentions
    Thompson, Megan M.
    Hendriks, Tonya
    Blais, Ann-Renee
    ETHICS & BEHAVIOR, 2018, 28 (07) : 578 - 596
  • [3] Patterns of Career Decision-Making Difficulties in 16 Countries: A Person-Centered Investigation
    Levin, Nimrod
    Lipshits-Braziler, Yuliya
    Gati, Itamar
    JOURNAL OF COUNSELING PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 71 (01) : 34 - 47
  • [4] A Person-Centered Approach to Moral Judgment
    Uhlmann, Eric Luis
    Pizarro, David A.
    Diermeier, Daniel
    PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2015, 10 (01) : 72 - 81
  • [5] Personal and moral intensity determinants of ethical decision-making A study of accounting professionals in Nigeria
    Oboh, Collins Sankay
    JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING IN EMERGING ECONOMIES, 2019, 9 (01) : 148 - 180
  • [6] Moral and ethical decision-making: A chance for doping prevention in sports?
    Melzer, Marcus
    Elbe, Anne-Marie
    Brand, Ralf
    ETIKK I PRAKSIS, 2010, 4 (01): : 69 - 85
  • [7] The Structure of Character Strengths: Variable- and Person-Centered Approaches
    Najderska, Malgorzata
    Cieciuch, Jan
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 9
  • [8] Moral Pragmatism as a Bridge Between Duty, Utility, and Virtue in Managers' Ethical Decision-Making
    Drascek, Matej
    Buhovac, Adriana Rejc
    Andolsek, Dana Mesner
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2021, 172 (04) : 803 - 819
  • [9] ACED IT: A tool for improved ethical and moral decision-making
    Kreitler, Crystal Mata
    Stenmark, Cheryl K.
    Rodarte, Allen M.
    DuMond, Rebecca Pinon
    JOURNAL OF MORAL EDUCATION, 2014, 43 (04) : 447 - 467
  • [10] Ethical decision-making of supervisors of color
    Levitt, Dana Heller
    Crawford, Candice R.
    Pamphile, Shanta
    JOURNAL OF MULTICULTURAL COUNSELING AND DEVELOPMENT, 2022, 50 (02) : 59 - 72