Targeted therapy or immunotherapy in BRAF-mutated metastatic melanoma: a Spanish center's decade of experience

被引:3
作者
Sun, Chen [1 ]
Espana, Sofia [2 ]
Richarz, Nina [3 ]
Sole-Blanch, Carme [4 ]
Boada, Aram [5 ]
Martinez-Cardus, Anna [4 ]
Chu, Alan [1 ]
Liu, Zongwen [1 ]
Manzano, Jose Luis [2 ]
机构
[1] Zhengzhou Univ, Affiliated Hosp 2, Dept Radiat Oncol, Zhengzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Hosp Germans Trias & Pujol, Germans & Trias Pujol Res Inst IGTP, Inst Catala Oncol Badalona, Med Oncol Dept, Badalona, Spain
[3] Hosp Badalona Germans Trias & Pujol, Dermatol Dept, Badalona, Spain
[4] Germans Trias & Pujol Res Inst IGTP, Badalona Appl Res Grp Oncol BARGO, Badalona, Spain
[5] Autonoma Univ Barcelona, Univ Hosp Germans Trias & Pujol, Germans & Trias Pujol Res Inst, Dermatol Dept, Badalona, Spain
关键词
target therapy; immunotherapy; melanoma; BRAF mutation V600; clinical experience; VEMURAFENIB; PHASE-3;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2024.1322116
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Targeted therapies and immunotherapy are currently considered the mainstay first-line treatment for advanced BRAF-mutated melanoma. However, the impact of treatment (targeted therapy and immunotherapy) and the prognostic factors are still not clear.Material and methods Medical records of 140 patients diagnosed with advanced melanoma between 2011 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed to extract demographic, BRAF status, treatment, performance status, and survival data. ORR, PFS, and OS were compared between patients diagnosed with advanced melanoma and treated with first-line IT or BRAF/MEKi. The prognostic factors were assessed using Cox regression models.Results In all patients and those treated with immunotherapy, we did not find any effect of BRAF status on ORR, PFS, or OS. In patients with BRAF-mutated melanoma, ORR was 43.8% vs. 70% (P=0.04), PFS was 19.2 vs. 11.5 months (p=0.22), and OS was 33.4 vs. 16.4 months for the immunotherapy and targeted therapy groups, respectively (P=0.04). ECOG, presence of brain metastases, and high LDH level from initiation of first-line treatment were all associated with differences in PFS and OS.Conclusion Patients with advanced BRAF-mutated melanoma treated with first-line immunotherapy had a significantly longer PFS and OS than those treated with first-line BRAF/MEKi; however, first-line BRAF/MEKi treatment had a significantly higher ORR than first-line immunotherapy.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 34 条
[31]   Long-Term Outcomes in BRAF-Mutated Melanoma Treated with Combined Targeted Therapy or Immune Checkpoint Blockade: Are We Approaching a True Cure? [J].
Schummer, Patrick ;
Schilling, Bastian ;
Gesierich, Anja .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DERMATOLOGY, 2020, 21 (04) :493-504
[32]   Prognostic Clinical and Radiographic Biomarkers for BRAF-Targeted Therapy in Advanced Melanoma [J].
Shah, Kaustav P. ;
Song, Haocan ;
Ye, Fei ;
Johnson, Douglas B. .
ONCOLOGIST, 2021, 26 (02) :E333-E335
[33]   Anti-PD-1/L1 lead-in before MAPK inhibitor combination maximizes antitumor immunity and efficacy [J].
Wang, Yujue ;
Liu, Sixue ;
Yang, Zhentao ;
Algazi, Alain ;
Lomeli, Shirley ;
Wang, Yan ;
Othus, Megan ;
Hong, Aayoung ;
Wang, Xiaoyan ;
Randolph, Chris ;
Jones, Alexis ;
Bosenberg, Marcus ;
Byrum, Stephanie ;
Tackett, Alan ;
Lopez, Henry ;
Yates, Clayton ;
Solit, David ;
Ribas, Antoni ;
Piva, Marco ;
Moriceau, Gatien ;
Lo, Roger .
CANCER CELL, 2021, 39 (10) :1375-+
[34]   BRAF and MEK inhibitors differentially affect nivolumab-induced T cell activation by modulating the TCR and AKT signaling pathways [J].
Yue, Peng ;
Harper, Taylor ;
Bacot, Silvia M. ;
Chowdhury, Monica ;
Lee, Shiowjen ;
Akue, Adovi ;
Kukuruga, Mark A. ;
Wang, Tao ;
Feldman, Gerald M. .
ONCOIMMUNOLOGY, 2019, 8 (01)