The highest percentage of Gleason Pattern 4 is a predictor in intermediate-risk prostate cancer

被引:3
作者
Sato, Shun [1 ,3 ]
Kimura, Takahiro [2 ]
Onuma, Hajime [2 ]
Egawa, Shin [2 ]
Shimoda, Masayuki [1 ]
Takahashi, Hiroyuki [1 ]
机构
[1] Jikei Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Tokyo, Japan
[2] Jikei Univ, Sch Med, Dept Urol, Tokyo, Japan
[3] Jikei Univ, Dept Pathol, Sch Med, 3-25-8 Nishishimbashi,Minato Ku, Tokyo 1058461, Japan
关键词
cribriform pattern; Gleason score; pathological marker; percentage of Gleason Pattern 4; prognostic factor; prostate cancer; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; CRIBRIFORM MORPHOLOGY; INVASIVE CRIBRIFORM; PROGNOSTIC VALUE; NEEDLE-BIOPSY; CARCINOMA; PATHOLOGY; UTILITY; MEN;
D O I
10.1002/bco2.195
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
ObjectivesThis study aims to clarify the clinicopathological significance of several novel pathological markers, including the percentage of Gleason pattern 4 and small/non-small cribriform pattern, in intermediate-risk Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer.Subjects and MethodsTwo-hundred and twenty-eight patients with Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 intermediate-risk prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy between 2009 and 2019 at our institute were selected. Preoperative clinicopathological characteristics, including serum prostate-specific antigen level, clinical T stage, percentage of cancer-positive cores at biopsy, small/non-small cribriform pattern, the highest percentage of Gleason pattern 4, the total length of Gleason pattern 4 and percentage of Gleason score 7 cores were examined in univariate/multivariate logistic regression analysis to determine their predictive value for postoperative adverse pathological findings, defined as an upgrade to Gleason score 4 + 3 = 7 or higher, pN1 or pT3b disease.ResultsFifty-four cases (23.7%) showed adverse pathological findings. Although a non-small cribriform pattern, highest Gleason pattern 4 percentage and total length of Gleason pattern 4 were predictive of adverse pathological findings in univariate analysis, only the highest Gleason pattern 4 percentage was an independent predictive factor in multivariate analysis (odds ratio: 1.610; 95% confidence interval: 1.260-2.070; P = 0.0002).ConclusionThe highest Gleason pattern 4 percentage was a potent predictive parameter for Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 intermediate-risk prostate cancer and should be considered in the risk classification scheme for prostate cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:234 / 240
页数:7
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2022, NCCN GUIDELINE PROST
[2]   Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: ASCO Clinical Practice Guideline Endorsement of an American Urological Association/American Society for Radiation Oncology/Society of Urologic Oncology Guideline [J].
Bekelman, Justin E. ;
Rumble, R. Bryan ;
Chen, Ronald C. ;
Pisansky, Thomas M. ;
Finelli, Antonio ;
Feifer, Andrew ;
Nguyen, Paul L. ;
Loblaw, D. Andrew ;
Tagawa, Scott T. ;
Gillessen, Silke ;
Morgan, Todd M. ;
Liu, Glenn ;
Vapiwala, Neha ;
Haluschak, John J. ;
Stephenson, Andrew ;
Touijer, Karim ;
Kungel, Terry ;
Freedland, Stephen J. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 36 (32) :3251-+
[3]   Prognostic value of cribriform size, percentage, and intraductal carcinoma in Gleason score 7 prostate cancer with cribriform Gleason pattern 4 [J].
Chen, Zhengshan ;
Pham, Huy ;
Abreu, Andre ;
Amin, Mahul B. ;
Sherrod, Andy E. ;
Xiao, Guang-Qian ;
Aron, Manju .
HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 2021, 118 :18-29
[4]   Prognostic Value of Percent Gleason Grade 4 at Prostate Biopsy in Predicting Prostatectomy Pathology and Recurrence [J].
Cole, Adam I. ;
Morgan, Todd M. ;
Spratt, Daniel E. ;
Palapattu, Ganesh S. ;
He, Chang ;
Tomlins, Scott A. ;
Weizer, Alon Z. ;
Feng, Felix Y. ;
Wu, Angela ;
Siddiqui, Javed ;
Chinnaiyan, Arul M. ;
Montgomery, Jeffrey S. ;
Kunju, Lakshmi P. ;
Miller, David C. ;
Hollenbeck, Brent K. ;
Wei, John T. ;
Mehra, Rohit .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 196 (02) :405-411
[5]   Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer [J].
D'Amico, AV ;
Whittington, R ;
Malkowicz, SB ;
Schultz, D ;
Blank, K ;
Broderick, GA ;
Tomaszewski, JE ;
Renshaw, AA ;
Kaplan, I ;
Beard, CJ ;
Wein, A .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (11) :969-974
[6]   Clinical Usefulness of Total Length of Gleason Pattern 4 on Biopsy in Men with Grade Group 2 Prostate Cancer [J].
Dean, Lucas W. ;
Assel, Melissa ;
Sjoberg, Daniel D. ;
Vickers, Andrew J. ;
Al-Ahmadie, Hikmat A. ;
Chen, Ying-Bei ;
Gopalan, Anuradha ;
Sirintrapun, S. Joseph ;
Tickoo, Satish K. ;
Eastham, James A. ;
Scardino, Peter T. ;
Reuter, Victor E. ;
Ehdaie, Behfar ;
Fine, Samson W. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 201 (01) :77-82
[7]   Predicting 15-Year Prostate Cancer Specific Mortality After Radical Prostatectomy [J].
Eggener, Scott E. ;
Scardino, Peter T. ;
Walsh, Patrick C. ;
Han, Misop ;
Partin, Alan W. ;
Trock, Bruce J. ;
Feng, Zhaoyong ;
Wood, David P. ;
Eastham, James A. ;
Yossepowitch, Ofer ;
Rabah, Danny M. ;
Kattan, Michael W. ;
Yu, Changhong ;
Klein, Eric A. ;
Stephenson, Andrew J. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 185 (03) :869-875
[8]   The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System [J].
Epstein, Jonathan I. ;
Egevad, Lars ;
Amin, Mahul B. ;
Delahunt, Brett ;
Srigley, John R. ;
Humphrey, Peter A. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2016, 40 (02) :244-252
[9]  
European Association of Urology Guideline, 2022, Prostate cancer
[10]   Utility of Gleason pattern 4 morphologies detected on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsies for prediction of upgrading or upstaging in Gleason score 3+4=7 prostate cancer [J].
Flood, Trevor A. ;
Schieda, Nicola ;
Keefe, Daniel T. ;
Breau, Rodney H. ;
Morash, Chris ;
Hogan, Kevin ;
Belanger, Eric C. ;
Mai, Kien T. ;
Robertson, Susan J. .
VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2016, 469 (03) :313-319