Single versus Double Preserflo MicroShunt Implantation in Glaucoma Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study

被引:2
|
作者
Dervos, Thomas [1 ]
Gugleta, Konstantin [1 ]
Scholl, Hendrik P. N. [1 ,2 ]
Gatzioufas, Zisis [1 ]
Enz, Tim J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Basel, Dept Ophthalmol, Mittlere Str 91, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland
[2] Inst Mol & Clin Ophthalmol Basel IOB, Basel, Switzerland
基金
英国惠康基金; 瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
Glaucoma; intraocular pressure; micro-invasive glaucoma surgery; Preserflo MicroShunt; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; FILTERING BLEBS; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1159/000535276
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Introduction The aim of this study is to describe and evaluate double Preserflo MicroShunt implantation as a modified micro-invasive glaucoma surgery technique and to retrospectively compare the outcomes in a cohort of glaucoma patients with single or double implantation.Materials and Methods A retrospective data analysis of 57 glaucoma patients who consecutively underwent Preserflo implantation was performed. Medical records were examined for patients' demographics, glaucoma type, intraocular pressure (IOP), medication, complications and re-interventions. Two groups with single (n=29) or double (n=28) implantation were formed and the outcomes were compared. In cases of two-stage double implantation (n=17), the course of the initial and the second implantation were compared.ResultsMean preoperative IOP was significantly higher in the double compared to the single implantation group (29.4 +/- 10.0mmHg; 21.7 +/- 8.2mmHg; P=0.003). Postoperatively, IOP was significantly lower in the double implantation group at various time-points (day 1, week 1, months 3 and 6; all P<0.021). In the subgroup with two-stage procedures, mean preoperative IOP was 24.5 +/- 8.5mmHg and 29.8 +/- 10.1mmHg, respectively; P=0.128). While immediately postoperatively, mean IOP-lowering was clinically significant and similar following both procedures, thelonger sustainable effect was observed after the second procedure (month 12: 25.5 +/- 7.5mmHg; 12.4 +/- 4.8mmHg; P=0.001). No serious complications were observedDiscussion/Conclusion Double Preserflo implantation appears safe and efficient for lowering IOP in glaucoma patients. Our preliminary findings suggest that double is superior to single implantation in terms of IOP-lowering and the need for additional topical medication. Patients with insufficient IOP-lowering following single implantation may benefit from a second implantation. Further research is warranted to evaluate double implantation as a first-line, one-stage procedure.
引用
收藏
页码:1362 / 1375
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Preliminary results of Preserflo Microshunt versus Preserflo Microshunt and Ologen implantation
    Vastardis, Iraklis
    Fili, Sofia
    Perdikakis, Georgios
    Kontopoulou, Kalliopi
    Balidis, Miltos
    Gatzioufas, Zisis
    Kohlhaas, Markus
    EYE AND VISION, 2021, 8 (01)
  • [2] Preserflo™ MicroShunt implantation combined with Ologen™ in primary and secondary glaucoma patients in a clinical setting
    Rojo-Arnao, Maria
    Martinez-de-la-Casa, Jose Maria
    Albis-Donado, Oscar
    Yanez-Castro, Giovanni
    Maroto-Cejudo, Raquel
    Tellez, Jesus
    Menoyo-Calatayud, Ricardo
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2024, 72 (03) : 417 - 426
  • [3] Preliminary results of Preserflo Microshunt versus Preserflo Microshunt and Ologen implantation
    Iraklis Vastardis
    Sofia Fili
    Georgios Perdikakis
    Kalliopi Kontopoulou
    Miltos Balidis
    Zisis Gatzioufas
    Markus Kohlhaas
    Eye and Vision, 8
  • [4] PreserFlo™ MicroShunt Combined with Phacoemulsification versus PreserFlo™ MicroShunt as a Standalone Procedure in Patients with Medically Resistant Open-Angle Glaucoma
    Fili, Sofia
    Kontopoulou, Kalliopi
    Vastardis, Iraklis
    Perdikakis, Georgios
    Bechrakis, Nikolaos
    Kohlhaas, Markus
    JOURNAL OF CURRENT OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2022, 34 (02): : 180 - 186
  • [5] PRESERFLO MicroShunt implantation versus trabeculectomy for primary open-angle glaucoma: a two-year follow-up study
    Gubser, Pascal Aurel
    Pfeiffer, Valentin
    Hug, Simon
    Shang, Xiao
    Lincke, Joel-Benjamin
    Haener, Nathanael Urs
    Zinkernagel, Martin S.
    Unterlauft, Jan Darius
    EYE AND VISION, 2023, 10 (01)
  • [6] PRESERFLO MicroShunt implantation versus trabeculectomy for primary open-angle glaucoma: a two-year follow-up study
    Pascal Aurel Gubser
    Valentin Pfeiffer
    Simon Hug
    Xiao Shang
    Joel-Benjamin Lincke
    Nathanael Urs Häner
    Martin S. Zinkernagel
    Jan Darius Unterlauft
    Eye and Vision, 10
  • [7] One-Year Outcomes of Preserflo™ MicroShunt Implantation versus Trabeculectomy for Pseudoexfoliation Glaucoma
    Nobl, Matthias
    Gruen, Clara
    Kassumeh, Stefan
    Priglinger, Siegfried
    Mackert, Marc J.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (08)
  • [8] Long-Term Outcomes of the PRESERFLO MicroShunt Implant in a Heterogeneous Glaucoma Cohort
    Storp, Jens Julian
    Vietmeier, Friederike Elisabeth
    Merte, Ralph-Laurent
    Koch, Raphael
    Zimmermann, Julian Alexander
    Eter, Nicole
    Bruecher, Viktoria Constanze
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (13)
  • [9] Xen 63 versus Preserflo MicroShunt implant in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma
    Martinez-de-la-Casa, Jose Maria
    Pascual-Santiago, Antonio
    Morales-Fernandez, Laura
    Saez-Frances, Federico
    Garcia-Saenz, Sofia
    Guemes-Villahoz, Noemi
    Sanchez-Jean, Ruben
    Mendez, Carmen
    Garcia-Feijoo, Julian
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2025, 15 (01):
  • [10] Early Results of Preserflo MicroShunt for Primary Open Angle Glaucoma in White Patients
    Pillunat, Karin R.
    Herber, Robert
    Jamke, Melanie
    Jasper, Carolin S.
    Haase, Maike A.
    Manseck, Anna S.
    Pillunat, Lutz E.
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2025, 34 (02) : 103 - 113