Widening participation - recruitment methods in mental health randomised controlled trials: a qualitative study

被引:5
作者
Iflaifel, Mais [1 ]
Hall, Charlotte L. [2 ,3 ]
Green, Heidi R. [4 ,5 ]
Willis, Andrew [6 ]
Rennick-Egglestone, Stefan [7 ]
Juszczak, Edmund [1 ]
Townsend, Mark [8 ]
Martin, Jennifer [2 ,3 ]
Sprange, Kirsty [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Nottingham Clin Trials Unit, Nottingham, England
[2] Univ Nottingham, Inst Mental Hlth, Sch Med, NIHR MindTech MedTech Cooperat, Innovat Pk,Triumph Rd, Nottingham, England
[3] Univ Nottingham, Inst Mental Hlth, NIHR Nottingham Biomed Res Ctr, Innovat Pk,Triumph Rd, Nottingham, England
[4] Univ Aberdeen, Previously Hlth Serv Res Unit, Aberdeen, Scotland
[5] COUCH Hlth, Manchester, England
[6] Univ Leicester, Ctr Ethn Hlth Res, Leicester Diabet Res Ctr, Leicester, England
[7] Univ Nottingham, Inst Mental Hlth, Sch Hlth Sci, Nottingham, England
[8] NIHR Evaluat Trials & Studies Coordinating Ctr NE, Southampton, England
关键词
Mental health; Recruitment; Randomised controlled trials; Thematic analysis; Stigma; Digital divide; Diversity; Inclusivity; INDIVIDUAL INTERVIEWS; DATA SATURATION; FOCUS GROUPS; BARRIERS; INTERNET; PEOPLE;
D O I
10.1186/s12874-023-02032-1
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundBarriers to mental health research participation are well documented including distrust of services and research; and stigma surrounding mental health. They can contribute to a lack of diversity amongst participants in mental health research, which threatens the generalisability of knowledge. Given the recent widespread use of the internet in medical research, this study aimed to explore the perspectives of key partners on the use of online (e.g. social media) and offline (e.g. in-person) recruitment as an approach to improving diversity in mental health randomised controlled trials (RCTs).MethodsFace-to-face and online interviews/focus groups with researchers working in mental health and Patient and Public Involvement partners in the United Kingdom. Recordings were transcribed and analysed using a combination of inductive and deductive thematic analysis.ResultsThree focus groups and three interviews were conducted with a total N = 23 participants. Four overarching themes were identified: (1) recruitment reach; (2) Demographic factors that affect selection of recruitment method; (3) safety of technology, and; (4) practical challenges. Five main factors were identified that affect the choice of recruitment method: age, complexity of mental health problem and stigma, cultural and ethnicity differences and digital divide. The use of online methods was considered more accessible to people who may feel stigmatised by their mental health condition and with a benefit of reaching a wider population. However, a common view amongst participants was that online methods require closer data monitoring for quality of responders, are not fully secure and less trustworthy compared to offline methods that enable participants to build relationships with health providers. Funding, staff time and experience, organisational support, and technical issues such as spam or phishing emails were highlighted as practical challenges facing online recruitment. All participants agreed that using a hybrid approach tailored to the population under study is paramount.ConclusionsThis study highlighted the importance of offering a flexible and multifaceted recruitment approach by integrating online with offline methods to support inclusivity and widening participation in mental health research. The findings will be used to develop considerations for researchers designing RCTs to improve recruitment in mental health research.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Using online methods to recruit participants into mental health clinical trials: considerations and recommendations from the RE-MIND study
    Iflaifel, Mais
    Hall, Charlotte L.
    Green, Heidi R.
    Willis, Andrew
    Rennick-Egglestone, Stefan
    Juszczak, Edmund
    Townsend, Mark
    Martin, Jennifer
    Sprange, Kirsty
    [J]. TRIALS, 2024, 25 (01)
  • [12] A review of patient recruitment in randomised controlled trials of preoperative exercise
    Steffens, Daniel
    Solomon, Michael
    Young, Jane
    Beckenkamp, Paula R.
    Bartyn, Jenna
    Koh, Cherry
    Hancock, Mark
    [J]. CLINICAL TRIALS, 2024, 21 (03) : 371 - 380
  • [13] Embedding qualitative research in randomised controlled trials to improve recruitment: findings from two recruitment optimisation studies of orthopaedic surgical trials
    Arabella Scantlebury
    Catriona McDaid
    Stephen Brealey
    Elizabeth Cook
    Hemant Sharma
    Arun Ranganathan
    Joy Adamson
    [J]. Trials, 22
  • [14] Embedding qualitative research in randomised controlled trials to improve recruitment: findings from two recruitment optimisation studies of orthopaedic surgical trials
    Scantlebury, Arabella
    McDaid, Catriona
    Brealey, Stephen
    Cook, Elizabeth
    Sharma, Hemant
    Ranganathan, Arun
    Adamson, Joy
    [J]. TRIALS, 2021, 22 (01)
  • [15] The trialists’ perspectives on the participant retention in mental health randomised controlled trials
    Paulina Szymczynska
    Stefan Priebe
    [J]. Trials, 16
  • [16] The trialists' perspectives on the participant retention in mental health randomised controlled trials
    Szymczynska, Paulina
    Priebe, Stefan
    [J]. TRIALS, 2015, 16
  • [17] Mental Health Services for Serious Mental Illness: Scoping Review of Randomised Controlled Trials
    Rodriguez, Pablo Roson
    Chen, Xiao
    Arancibia, Marcelo
    Madrid, Eva
    Shokraneh, Farhad
    Adams, Clive E.
    Franco, Juan Victor Ariel
    [J]. NURSING OPEN, 2025, 12 (01):
  • [18] The process of health behaviour change following participation in a randomised controlled trial targeting prediabetes: A qualitative study
    Schmidt, Kirstine
    Faerch, Kristine
    Zoffmann, Vibeke
    Amadid, Hanan
    Varming, Annemarie R.
    [J]. DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2022, 39 (04)
  • [19] Maximising recruitment into randomised controlled trials: The role of multidisciplinary cancer teams
    McNair, A. G. K.
    Choh, C. T. P.
    Metcalfe, C.
    Littlejohns, D.
    Barham, C. P.
    hollowood, A.
    Falk, S. J.
    Blazeby, J. M.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2008, 44 (17) : 2623 - 2626
  • [20] A systematic review of the efficiency of recruitment to stroke rehabilitation randomised controlled trials
    Kris McGill
    Catherine M. Sackley
    Jon Godwin
    Jodie McGarry
    Marian C. Brady
    [J]. Trials, 21