Widening participation - recruitment methods in mental health randomised controlled trials: a qualitative study

被引:5
|
作者
Iflaifel, Mais [1 ]
Hall, Charlotte L. [2 ,3 ]
Green, Heidi R. [4 ,5 ]
Willis, Andrew [6 ]
Rennick-Egglestone, Stefan [7 ]
Juszczak, Edmund [1 ]
Townsend, Mark [8 ]
Martin, Jennifer [2 ,3 ]
Sprange, Kirsty [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Nottingham Clin Trials Unit, Nottingham, England
[2] Univ Nottingham, Inst Mental Hlth, Sch Med, NIHR MindTech MedTech Cooperat, Innovat Pk,Triumph Rd, Nottingham, England
[3] Univ Nottingham, Inst Mental Hlth, NIHR Nottingham Biomed Res Ctr, Innovat Pk,Triumph Rd, Nottingham, England
[4] Univ Aberdeen, Previously Hlth Serv Res Unit, Aberdeen, Scotland
[5] COUCH Hlth, Manchester, England
[6] Univ Leicester, Ctr Ethn Hlth Res, Leicester Diabet Res Ctr, Leicester, England
[7] Univ Nottingham, Inst Mental Hlth, Sch Hlth Sci, Nottingham, England
[8] NIHR Evaluat Trials & Studies Coordinating Ctr NE, Southampton, England
关键词
Mental health; Recruitment; Randomised controlled trials; Thematic analysis; Stigma; Digital divide; Diversity; Inclusivity; INDIVIDUAL INTERVIEWS; DATA SATURATION; FOCUS GROUPS; BARRIERS; INTERNET; PEOPLE;
D O I
10.1186/s12874-023-02032-1
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundBarriers to mental health research participation are well documented including distrust of services and research; and stigma surrounding mental health. They can contribute to a lack of diversity amongst participants in mental health research, which threatens the generalisability of knowledge. Given the recent widespread use of the internet in medical research, this study aimed to explore the perspectives of key partners on the use of online (e.g. social media) and offline (e.g. in-person) recruitment as an approach to improving diversity in mental health randomised controlled trials (RCTs).MethodsFace-to-face and online interviews/focus groups with researchers working in mental health and Patient and Public Involvement partners in the United Kingdom. Recordings were transcribed and analysed using a combination of inductive and deductive thematic analysis.ResultsThree focus groups and three interviews were conducted with a total N = 23 participants. Four overarching themes were identified: (1) recruitment reach; (2) Demographic factors that affect selection of recruitment method; (3) safety of technology, and; (4) practical challenges. Five main factors were identified that affect the choice of recruitment method: age, complexity of mental health problem and stigma, cultural and ethnicity differences and digital divide. The use of online methods was considered more accessible to people who may feel stigmatised by their mental health condition and with a benefit of reaching a wider population. However, a common view amongst participants was that online methods require closer data monitoring for quality of responders, are not fully secure and less trustworthy compared to offline methods that enable participants to build relationships with health providers. Funding, staff time and experience, organisational support, and technical issues such as spam or phishing emails were highlighted as practical challenges facing online recruitment. All participants agreed that using a hybrid approach tailored to the population under study is paramount.ConclusionsThis study highlighted the importance of offering a flexible and multifaceted recruitment approach by integrating online with offline methods to support inclusivity and widening participation in mental health research. The findings will be used to develop considerations for researchers designing RCTs to improve recruitment in mental health research.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Widening participation – recruitment methods in mental health randomised controlled trials: a qualitative study
    Mais Iflaifel
    Charlotte L Hall
    Heidi R Green
    Andrew Willis
    Stefan Rennick-Egglestone
    Edmund Juszczak
    Mark Townsend
    Jennifer Martin
    Kirsty Sprange
    BMC Medical Research Methodology, 23
  • [2] Understanding and Improving Recruitment to Randomised Controlled Trials: Qualitative Research Approaches
    Elliott, Daisy
    Husbands, Samantha
    Hamdy, Freddie C.
    Holmberg, Lars
    Donovan, Jenny L.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2017, 72 (05) : 789 - 798
  • [3] Influences on recruitment to randomised controlled trials in mental health settings in England: a national cross-sectional survey of researchers working for the Mental Health Research Network
    Rohan Borschmann
    Sue Patterson
    Dilkushi Poovendran
    Danielle Wilson
    Tim Weaver
    BMC Medical Research Methodology, 14
  • [4] Strategies to improve recruitment in mental health clinical trials: a scoping review (RE-MIND study)
    Iflaifel, Mais
    Hall, Charlotte L.
    Green, Heidi R.
    Willis, Andrew
    Rennick-Egglestone, Stefan
    Juszczak, Edmund
    Townsend, Mark
    Martin, Jennifer
    Sprange, Kirsty
    TRIALS, 2024, 25 (01)
  • [5] Influences on recruitment to randomised controlled trials in mental health settings in England: a national cross-sectional survey of researchers working for the Mental Health Research Network
    Borschmann, Rohan
    Patterson, Sue
    Poovendran, Dilkushi
    Wilson, Danielle
    Weaver, Tim
    BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2014, 14
  • [6] Barriers and facilitators to participant recruitment to randomised controlled trials: A qualitative perspective
    Team, Victoria
    Bugeja, Lyndal
    Weller, Carolina D.
    INTERNATIONAL WOUND JOURNAL, 2018, 15 (06) : 929 - 942
  • [7] Maximising recruitment to a randomised controlled trial for chronic rhinosinusitis using qualitative research methods: the MACRO conversation study
    Clare McDermott
    Jane Vennik
    Carl Philpott
    Steffi le Conte
    Mike Thomas
    Caroline Eyles
    Paul Little
    Helen Blackshaw
    Anne Schilder
    Claire Hopkins
    Trials, 22
  • [8] Maximising recruitment to a randomised controlled trial for chronic rhinosinusitis using qualitative research methods: the MACRO conversation study
    McDermott, Clare
    Vennik, Jane
    Philpott, Carl
    le Conte, Steffi
    Thomas, Mike
    Eyles, Caroline
    Little, Paul
    Blackshaw, Helen
    Schilder, Anne
    Hopkins, Claire
    TRIALS, 2021, 22 (01)
  • [9] A systematic review of the efficiency of recruitment to stroke rehabilitation randomised controlled trials
    McGill, Kris
    Sackley, Catherine M.
    Godwin, Jon
    McGarry, Jodie
    Brady, Marian C.
    TRIALS, 2020, 21 (01)
  • [10] Factors that impact on recruitment to randomised trials in health care: a qualitative evidence synthesis
    Houghton, Catherine
    Dowling, Maura
    Meskell, Pauline
    Hunter, Andrew
    Gardner, Heidi
    Conway, Aislinn
    Treweek, Shaun
    Sutcli, Katy
    Noyes, Jane
    Devane, Declan
    Nicholas, Jane R.
    Biesty, Linda M.
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2020, (10):