Co-pyrolysis of sewage sludge with lignocellulosic and algal biomass for sustainable liquid and gaseous fuel production: A life cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis

被引:25
作者
Mohamed, Badr A. [1 ,2 ]
O'Boyle, Marnie [1 ]
Li, Loretta Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Dept Civil Engn, 6250 Appl Sci Lane, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
[2] Cairo Univ, Dept Agr Engn, El Gamma St, Giza 12613, Egypt
关键词
Bio-oil; Biochar; Environmental burdens; Life cycle assessment; Techno-economic analysis; Global warming potential; BIOFUEL PRODUCTION; WASTE-WATER; BIOCHAR PRODUCTION; GREENHOUSE-GAS; ENERGY; TECHNOLOGIES; MICROALGAE; CARBON;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121318
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Biowastes are marked sources of global greenhouse gas emissions, however, locally accessible biowaste could be a sustainable source for biofuel production to generate clean energy. This study examined the environmental sustainability and economic feasibility of using co-pyrolysed sewage sludge (SS) with lignocellulosic and algal biomass for liquid and gaseous fuel production from the perspective of life cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis. Wastewater-grown microalgae, sawdust, and wheat straw were selected as co-feed materials, and three mixing ratios (25, 50, and 75 wt%) of each feedstock with SS were examined. Wastewater-grown microalgae and SS were obtained from wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs), which were assumed to be near the pyrolysis plant facility, obviating the need for transportation. An Aspen simulation was used to estimate the amount of energy recovered from the pyrolysis as gaseous fuel for electricity and heat generation via gas turbines. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to identify future considerations for SS co-pyrolysis to make it a more environmentally and economically viable industrial process for producing liquid and gaseous fuels. The co-pyrolysis of SS with biomass reduced the overall environmental burden, with sawdust co-pyrolysis outperforming wheat straw and microalgal co-pyrolysis. All scenarios achieved a high net positive energy balance (from 2,595 to 6,323 kWh/ 1,000 kg bio-oil) and reduced global warming potential (GWP) (from-793 to-1,970 kg CO2 eq/1,000 kg bio-oil). Sawdust co-pyrolysis resulted in the highest GWP reduction (from-1,510 to-1,970 kg CO2 eq/1,000 kg bio-oil) and energy recovery (from 5,551 to 6,323 kWh/1,000 kg bio-oil). Energy recovery from gaseous fuel through gas turbine operation generated a process energy demand of 23 %-224 %. Sawdust co-pyrolysis exhibited the highest net present worth (NPW) of 6.16 million CAD. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the GWP and terrestrial ecotoxicity potential were affected by the transportation of sawdust and wheat straw. Overall, the co-pyrolysis of SS with both lignocellulosic and algal biomass is sustainable and economically feasible for producing liquid and gaseous fuels and treating hazardous waste originating from WWTPs, thereby facilitating environmental sustainability and a circular economy from the sale of pyrolysis products. Broader implication of this study is using effective catalysts to further strengthen the sustainability and increase the profitability of the co-pyrolysis process, which has not been yet investigated.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 86 条
[1]   Surface modification of activated carbon for adsorption of SO2 and NOX: A review of existing and emerging technologies [J].
Abdulrasheed, A. A. ;
Jalil, A. A. ;
Triwahyono, S. ;
Zaini, M. A. A. ;
Gambo, Y. ;
Ibrahim, M. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2018, 94 :1067-1085
[2]   A review on co-pyrolysis of biomass: An optional technique to obtain a high-grade pyrolysis oil [J].
Abnisa, Faisal ;
Daud, Wan Mohd Ashri Wan .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2014, 87 :71-85
[3]   Biochar production by sewage sludge pyrolysis [J].
Agrafioti, Evita ;
Bouras, George ;
Kalderis, Dimitrios ;
Diamadopoulos, Evan .
JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL AND APPLIED PYROLYSIS, 2013, 101 :72-78
[4]   Understanding the environmental impacts of biogas utilization for energy production through life cycle assessment: An action towards reducing emissions [J].
Alengebawy, Ahmed ;
Mohamed, Badr A. ;
Ghimire, Nirmal ;
Jin, Keda ;
Liu, Tingting ;
Samer, Mohamed ;
Ai, Ping .
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2022, 213
[5]   Fast co-pyrolysis of sewage sludge and lignocellulosic biomass in a conical spouted bed reactor [J].
Alvarez, Jon ;
Amutio, Maider ;
Lopez, Gartzen ;
Bilbao, Javier ;
Olazar, Martin .
FUEL, 2015, 159 :810-818
[6]   Comparison of UV, UV/H2O2 and ozonation processes for the treatment of membrane distillation concentrate from surface water treatment: PhACs removal and environmental and human health risk assessment [J].
Alvim, Clara Bretas ;
Moreira, Victor Rezende ;
Rocha Lebron, Yuri Abner ;
Santos, Amanda Vitoria ;
Lange, Lisete Celina ;
Moreira, Regina P. M. ;
de Souza Santos, Lucilaine Valeria ;
Santos Amaral, Miriam Cristina .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2020, 397
[7]   Anaerobic membrane bioreactor for the production of bioH2: Electron flow, fouling modeling and kinetic study [J].
Amin, Mohammad Mehdi ;
Taheri, Ensiyeh ;
Fatehizadeh, Ali ;
Rezakazemi, Mashallah ;
Aminabhavi, Tejraj M. .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2021, 426
[8]   Impact of pyrolysis and hydrothermal biochar on gas-emitting activity of soil microorganisms and bacterial and archaeal community composition [J].
Andert, Janet ;
Mumme, Jan .
APPLIED SOIL ECOLOGY, 2015, 96 :225-239
[9]  
Baldi M, 2018, SLUDGE THICKENING DE
[10]   Pyrolysis of switchgrass in an auger reactor for biochar production: A greenhouse gas and energy impacts assessment [J].
Brassard, Patrick ;
Godbout, Stephane ;
Pelletier, Frederic ;
Raghavan, Vijaya ;
Palacios, Joahnn H. .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2018, 116 :99-105