Quantifying the scientific revolution

被引:0
|
作者
de Courson, Benoit [1 ,2 ]
Thouzeau, Valentin [2 ]
Baumard, Nicolas [2 ]
机构
[1] Max Planck Inst Study Crime Secur & Law, Gunterstalstr 73, D-79100 Freiburg, Germany
[2] Ecole Normale Super, Dept Etud Cognit, Paris, France
来源
EVOLUTIONARY HUMAN SCIENCES | 2023年 / 5卷
关键词
Cultural evolution; history of science; digital humanities; economic development; MIDDLE-EAST; TECHNOLOGICAL-CHANGE; GOOGLE-SCHOLAR; SCIENCE; EUROPE; RISE; WEB; SCOPUS; WAGES; DIVERGENCE;
D O I
10.1017/ehs.2023.6
中图分类号
Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
030303 ;
摘要
The Scientific Revolution represents a turning point in the history of humanity. Yet it remains ill -understood, partly because of a lack of quantification. Here, we leverage large datasets of individual biographies (N = 22,943) and present the first estimates of scientific production during the late medieval and early modern period (1300-1850). Our data reveal striking differences across countries, with England and the United Provinces being much more creative than other countries, suggesting that economic development has been key in generating the Scientific Revolution. In line with recent results in behavioural sciences, we show that scientific creativity and economic development are associated with other kinds of creative activities in philosophy, literature, music and the arts, as well as with inclusive institutions and ascetic religiosity, suggesting a common underlying mindset associated with long-term orientation and exploration. Finally, we investigate the interplay between economic development and cultural transmission (the so-called Republic of Letters') using partially observed Markov models imported from population biology. Surprisingly, the role of horizontal transmission (from one country to another) seems to have been marginal. Beyond the case of science, our results suggest that economic development is an important factor in the evolution of aspects of human culture.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Simple Journal Adviser for Scientific Articles
    Balakin, M.
    Belov, S.
    Zrelov, P.
    PHYSICS OF PARTICLES AND NUCLEI, 2024, 55 (03) : 572 - 575
  • [22] Petrograd's Scientific Societies and the Revolution of 1917
    Sinelnikova, E. F.
    NOVEISHAYA ISTORIYA ROSSII-MODERN HISTORY OF RUSSIA, 2020, 10 (01): : 20 - 38
  • [23] Issues of countering the shadow economy in the scientific literature
    Burov, V. Yu
    Tumunbayarova, Z. B.
    Khanchuk, N. N.
    Masalov, P., V
    VESTNIK SANKT-PETERBURGSKOGO UNIVERSITETA-EKONOMIKA-ST PETERSBURG UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2022, 38 (03): : 462 - 494
  • [24] Bibliometric Study of Scientific Research on Overnight Orthokeratology
    Villa-Collar, Cesar
    Alvarez-Peregrina, Cristina
    Santa Cruz, Fernando Hidalgo
    Javier Povedano-Montero, Francisco
    EYE & CONTACT LENS-SCIENCE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2018, 44 (05): : 344 - 349
  • [25] Is open access the solution to increase the impact of scientific journals?
    Pisoschi, Aurelia Magdalena
    Pisoschi, Claudia Gabriela
    SCIENTOMETRICS, 2016, 109 (02) : 1075 - 1095
  • [26] SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATION AND SCIENTIFIC SEARCH ENGINES: SCOPING REVIEW
    Pastor-Ramon, Elena
    Rovira, Cristofol
    INDEX COMUNICACION, 2023, 13 (01): : 79 - 103
  • [27] Are scientific memes inherited differently from gendered authorship?
    Araujo, Tanya
    Fontainha, Elsa
    SCIENTOMETRICS, 2018, 117 (02) : 953 - 972
  • [28] Geographic trends of scientific output and citation practices in psychiatry
    Igoumenou, Artemis
    Ebmeier, Klaus
    Roberts, Nia
    Fazel, Seena
    BMC PSYCHIATRY, 2014, 14
  • [29] Quantifying the use and potential benefits of artificial intelligence in scientific research
    Gao, Jian
    Wang, Dashun
    NATURE HUMAN BEHAVIOUR, 2024,
  • [30] Quantifying the impact of strong ties in international scientific research collaboration
    Liu, Junwan
    Guo, Xiaofei
    Xu, Shuo
    Zhang, Yueyan
    PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (01):