What does it mean to be "prepared for work"? Perceptions of new engineers

被引:2
作者
Deters, Jessica R. [1 ]
Paretti, Marie C. [2 ,4 ]
Perry, Logan A. [3 ]
Ott, Robin [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nebraska Lincoln, Mech & Mat Engn, Lincoln, NE USA
[2] Virginia Tech, Engn Educ, Blacksburg, VA USA
[3] Univ Nebraska Lincoln, Civil & Environm Engn, Lincoln, NE USA
[4] Virginia Tech, Engn Educ, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
capstone design; employment; preparation; qualitative; workplace;
D O I
10.1002/jee.20572
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
BackgroundEngineering education seeks to prepare students for engineering practice, but the concept of preparedness is often ill-defined. Moreover, findings from studies of different populations or in different contexts vary regarding how well new graduates are prepared. These variations, coupled with the lack of clarity, suggest the need to better understand what it means to be prepared for engineering work.PurposeThis study contributes to research on workplace preparation by exploring how new graduates describe being prepared for engineering work.MethodApplying secondary analysis to data from the multi-institution Capstone To Work (C2W) project, we used thematic analysis to explore new engineers' descriptions of preparedness. We analyzed written responses to structured questions about the school-to-work transition collected weekly during participants' first 12 weeks of work; 105 graduates drawn from four universities provided 956 responses, with a mean of 9 (out of 12 possible) responses per participant.ResultsParticipants' descriptions of preparedness included applying concrete skills, recognizing familiar situations, and having strategies for approaching challenging tasks even when they lacked relevant knowledge or skill.ConclusionOur findings suggest that although many discussions about workplace preparation implicitly focus narrowly on mastery of skills and knowledge, that focus may not fully capture new graduates' experiences, and may limit discussions about the ways in which school can (and cannot) prepare students for work. A more expansive understanding may better support both student learning and workplace onboarding, though more research is needed across stakeholders to establish shared understanding.
引用
收藏
页码:103 / 123
页数:21
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]  
American Society for Engineering Education, 2020, IND 40 WORKFORCE SUM
[2]  
American Society for Engineering Education, 2018, Transforming undergraduate education in engineering phase IV: Views of faculty and professional societies
[3]  
American Society for Engineering Education, 2020, ASEE Corporate Member Council Survey for Skills Gaps in Recent Engineering
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2017, Transforming undergraduate education in engineering phase II: Insights from tomorrow's engineers Transforming undergraduate education in engineering, Issue
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Transforming undergraduate education in engineering: Phase I: Synthesizing and integrating industry perspectives-workshop report
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1930, Report of the Investigation of Engineering Education, 1923-1929
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1994, The Green Report: Engineering education for a changing world
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2004, ENG 2020, DOI DOI 10.17226/10999
[9]  
Bobbett D., 2023, ASEE ANN C EXPOSITIO
[10]   Rethinking transfer: A simple proposal with multiple implications [J].
Bransford, JD ;
Schwartz, DL .
REVIEW OF RESEARCH IN EDUCATION, 24 1999, 1999, 24 :61-100